Skip to comments.
Tax-cut ad citing JFK irks Kennedys
Boston Globe ^
| 5/9/2003
Posted on 05/09/2003 11:39:11 AM PDT by nickcarraway
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:09:45 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
WASHINGTON -- The family of President Kennedy objected yesterday to the use of his name or image in ads touting President Bush's tax cut package. The late president's brother, Senator Edward M. Kennedy, and daughter, Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg, said the ads were ''politically irresponsible and grossly inaccurate,'' and called on the Club for Growth, a tax-cut advocacy group, to take them off the air.
(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...
TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: bushtaxcuts; economy; jfk; kennedy; saintkennedy; taxcuts; taxes; tedkennedy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
To: nickcarraway
They said Bush's tax plan is skewed to benefit the rich, whereas President Kennedy's went primarily to lower and middle income families. As I recall, Kennedy's plan cut the top rate drastically. I don't think lower and middle income families paid the top rate.
2
posted on
05/09/2003 11:41:59 AM PDT
by
Inyokern
To: nickcarraway
JFK was the LAST conservative democrat. His party and brother have completely embraced the socialist left and have absolutely nothing in common with the way JFK saw the world. We should be encouraging common sense, mainstream democrats to wake up and realize what their party has become..and we should welcome them to our side.
To: nickcarraway
ROTFLMAO! The DEMONCRATS are free to use Kennedy as much as they want, they don't OWN his words, what fools they are.
4
posted on
05/09/2003 11:43:02 AM PDT
by
Mister Baredog
((They wanted to kill 50,000 of us on 9/11, we will never forget!))
To: nickcarraway
Should have put an ",again" at the end. Did the same trick last time and it worked. Reminds people that Republicans aren't the only ones that cut taxes, and allows the Dem zealots to embarass themselves.
5
posted on
05/09/2003 11:44:06 AM PDT
by
discostu
(A cow don't make ham)
To: nickcarraway
Cry me a river for the Kennedys.
To: nickcarraway
Tax-cut ad citing JFK irks KennedysGood! In that case we should run it again and again!
7
posted on
05/09/2003 11:44:58 AM PDT
by
Bigun
(IRSsucks@getridof it.com)
To: nickcarraway
To bad Teddy can't drown this cute but vexing historically accurate Kennedy legacy.
8
posted on
05/09/2003 11:45:41 AM PDT
by
kimoajax
To: Bigun
How about the ad "If Mary Jo Kopeckne were alive today, she would have wanted a tax cut".
To: Inyokern
"a. Herbert Stein observed that the tax cut plan gave
considerable deference to the interests of corporations and wealthy individuals as taxpayers.[5]
"b. Despite the fact that the largest marginal reductions were targeted towards upper-income Americans, revenues grew significantly from this group.
"In the three years prior to the tax cut, revenues from those earning more than $50,000 grew by 6.1 percent annually. In the three years after the tax cut, this growth rate more than doubled to 14.1 percent annually."
Kennedy Tax Cut Plan
To: Inyokern
I believe that Kennedy's tax cut was the greatest tax cut the rich ever recieved. (and probably will ever recieve) I think the top tax rate was 90% before that. 90 %. 90%.
To: nickcarraway
The Dimrats hate it when it is made obvious that the best thing their favorite son did was act like a republican.
To: nickcarraway
basically, all ronald reagan did, was restore america to the democrat party of 1960, in effect, opposing the leftism that gradually took hold increasingly from the fdr-lbj-1970's university socialism. the latter was cuban communism.
13
posted on
05/09/2003 11:48:41 AM PDT
by
liberalnot
(what democrats fear the most is real democracy.)
To: nickcarraway
To make the Kennedys go even more ballistic, how about some ads reminding everyone that JFK stood up to foreign powers that demanded we convert to socialism or they would "bury us".
14
posted on
05/09/2003 11:50:10 AM PDT
by
snarkpup
To: Lance Romance
LOL! Yes indeed!
15
posted on
05/09/2003 11:50:14 AM PDT
by
Bigun
(IRSsucks@getridof it.com)
To: nickcarraway
Caroline Kennedy-Schlossberg was complaining two years ago about this very subject. Why is it news now?
John Edwards crossed over to read what's left...? Nevermind.
Tough cookies. It was a speech by someone in "public service" as the Kennedys like to remind everybody ad nauseum.
Not only that, it was the right thing to do then, and its the right thing to do now.
To: Inyokern
a. Cut individual income tax rates across the board, including reducing the top marginal rate from 91 to 70 percent. The lowest rate went from 20 percent to 14 percent.
b. Reduced the rate of corporate taxation from 52 percent to 47 percent.
c. Liberalized rules for the depreciation of capital.
To: nickcarraway
-- The family of President Kennedy objected yesterday to the use of his name or image in ads touting President Bush's tax cut package. The late president's brother, Senator Edward M. Kennedy, and daughter, Caroline Kennedy Schlossberg, said the ads were ''politically irresponsible and grossly inaccurate,'' and called on the Club for Growth, a tax-cut advocacy group, to take them off the air.To this bunch of greedy slobbering plunder and squander Democrats, anything that reduces their ill gotten tax loot is evil. The ads must be effective if they're complaining.
18
posted on
05/09/2003 11:51:14 AM PDT
by
from occupied ga
(Your government is your enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
Senator Ted Kennedys record on the (John) Kennedy-Johnson Tax Cut:[9]
a. Voted yes on final passage in the Senate, February 7, 1964[10]
b. Voted yes on the final Conference Report, February 26, 1964.[11]
To: nickcarraway
Pointing out what John Kennedy stood for causes the Kennedys to come to terms with how much they have prostituted themselves to the left in the name of power.
The truth about what the left was when juxtaposed with what it now will always elicit a visceral response because it illuminates their depravity so clearly.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson