Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Abortion Push Starts in Postwar Iraq
National Catholic Register ^ | National Catholic Register | JOSEPH A. D'AGOSTINO

Posted on 04/30/2003 11:39:55 PM PDT by nickcarraway

WASHINGTON - As attention in Iraq begins to shift from war to rebuilding, some Catholic leaders wonder what kind of society the United States and United Nations want to create there.

In the past, institutions such as the U.S. Agency for International Development and the U.N. Population Fund have promoted family planning, including abortion. Such promotion could result in a backlash among the traditional Christians and Muslims of Iraq, some observers say.

"I know that wherever [the U.N. Population Fund] goes, contraception and abortion follow," said Austin Ruse, president of the Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute, an organization that lobbies the United Nations full time regarding pro-life issues.

In fact, Gloria Feldt, president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, has already issued a statement saying, "If we are fighting for freedom in Iraq, then most surely that freedom should extend to women globally and in the United States. The most fundamental freedom is the freedom of reproductive self-determination … Reproductive health care is an essential part of any health care package - to address sexual violence, HIV prevention, maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity, and to provide basic reproductive health services," meaning abortion.

If aid workers do not promote contraception and abortion in Iraq, said Steve Mosher, president of the Population Research Institute, "[I]t will be the exception to the rule. We were in the face of the Iranians in the '70s trying to force family planning on the shah, and that was one of the things that gave support to the ayatollah."

Right now, Mosher said, family planning materials - contraception, abortion devices or sex education - are not being sent into Iraq.

However, "it's early," Mosher said.

USAID official Alfonso Aguilar confirmed that so far, his organization is not promoting family planning in Iraq.

"Right now, we are working to restore basic health services," he said.

But as for the future, he said, "I wouldn't venture to say."

USAID's Request for Programs for Iraq, an application provided to groups that want U.S. funding to aid Iraqis, includes a section for "Family Planning and Population Assistance Activities."

Since the Bush administration came into office, political appointees at USAID have reoriented the agency.

"USAID's HIV/AIDS programs now focus on promoting abstinence and delaying the onset of sexual activity and, when appropriate, the use of condoms," wrote Dr. Anne Peterson, USAID assistant administrator for global health, in the Washington Times on April 6. "In Uganda, where HIV prevalence rates have gone from 15% to 5%, USAID's analysis has shown that abstinence education and the involvement of faith-based organizations have been among the keys to reducing infection levels."

"It's called ABC," Aguilar said. "Abstinence, behavioral change, condoms if and when necessary."

He said USAID is committed to the Mexico City policy reinstituted by Bush, which forbids foreign aid money for abortion, but admitted groups that promote abortion could get American money for their other programs.

The Population Research Institute reported Aug. 14 that Afghan women its associates interviewed told some disturbing stories.

"Many of the women interviewed had just returned to Afghanistan from Pakistan," it said. "They reported abortion campaigns led by United Nations-funded aid organizations operating inside refugee camps. … A high percentage of the women returning from Pakistan - 25% - reported that they had been subjected to abortion or sterilization procedures while in refugee camps there. … Not one woman stated that abortion or contraception services were wanted or needed, indicating a strong likelihood that abortions performed in Pakistan refugee camps were done without adequate informed consent."

Mosher said the U.N. Population Fund has "mobile obstetrics units in Iraq."

Ruse noted the organization's refugee kits contain the "morning-after pill," which can cause abortions, as well as an abortion device, the manual vacuum aspirator. U.N. Population Fund officials have long claimed the aspirators are used to complete botched abortions only.

Geraldine Hemmings, director of communications for Aid to the Church in Need, said her organization is helping Iraqis regardless of religion.

"We think it's very important to support and uphold organizations that conform to the Church's teachings," she said.

She said promotion of activities "destructive of society itself" such as family planning would anger both Christians and Muslims in the country.

"People on all sides are going to be very upset," she said. Aid groups active in Bosnia promoted family planning there, she said, "a year or two after the conflict."

Walten Mirza, president of the Assyrian Church of St. George in Chicago who left Iraq 25 years ago, said many Christians and Muslims in Iraq would accept contraception but not abortion. But "Muslims in rural areas might be very angry over contraception," he said.

Bishop Ibrahim N. Ibrahim of the Chaldean Diocese of St. Thomas the Apostle in Southfield, Mich., said the Iraqi people would not accept abortion. "Christians are against these things and the Muslims are against them, too," he said.

Beyond family planning and abortion, some Catholics worry other negative attitudes now so prominent in the West with the decline of Christianity could be foisted on Iraq. Pope John Paul II in his World Day of Peace Message on Jan. 1, 2001, said Western models "detached from their Christian origins" and are "often inspired by an approach to life marked by secularism and practical atheism and by patterns of radical individualism."

Though the State Department had been handling a "Future of Iraq" project, on Jan. 20, Bush issued an executive order establishing an Office of Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance headed by retired Lt. Gen. Jay Garner at the Pentagon. This office could set policies on large cultural issues.

"We would like to see the Pentagon handle the reconstruction and not the State Department," Ruse said approvingly.

The Pentagon did not respond to the Register's request to learn about the office's Iraq plans.

Marc Grossman, undersecretary of state for political affairs, on Feb. 11 outlined the administration's priorities in reconstructing Iraq before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

"First, we will demonstrate to the Iraqi people and to the world that the United States wants to liberate Iraq, not to occupy," he said. "Second, we must eliminate Iraq's chemical and biological weapons [and] its nuclear program. … Third, we must also eliminate Iraq's terrorist infrastructure and its ties to terrorism. Fourth, [we must] support and safeguard the territorial integrity of Iraq. … [The] United States does not support Iraq's disintegration. And fifth, to begin the process of economic and political reconstruction, working to put Iraq on a path to become prosperous and free."

Joseph A. D'Agostino writes from Washington, D.C.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: abortion; afghanistan; catholic; christian; familyplanning; iraq; mosher; muslim; pakistan; pentagon; poporg; population; populationcontrol; populationinstitute; populationresearch; postwariraq; pri; prolife; sin; stevermosher; terrorism; unitednations; war
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 04/30/2003 11:39:55 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
United Nations' Abortion Agenda in Iraq Condemned

Family Planners Eye Abortion Jihad in Iraq

2 posted on 04/30/2003 11:42:17 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: firebrand; Coleus; RaceBannon
ping
3 posted on 04/30/2003 11:45:55 PM PDT by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah; Desdemona; Lady In Blue; NYer; Salvation; cpforlife.org; toenail; ...
ping
4 posted on 04/30/2003 11:46:26 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
< a href="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/884062/posts">Planned Parenthood Providing Abortions in Iraq???</a>
5 posted on 04/30/2003 11:47:27 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Planned Parenthood Providing Abortions in Iraq???
6 posted on 04/30/2003 11:48:09 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Hey, President Bush! Wake up!!!

U.S. TAXPAYER FUNDED U.N. "FAMILY PLANNING" = BABY KILLING

7 posted on 05/01/2003 12:26:48 AM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Wow! This issue puts the pro-abortionists on the hot seat big time! To think that abortions in Iraq could endanger our soldiers' lives, amazing! An abortion moratorium should be invoked until the Iraqis have a vote on this touchy issue. It should be entirely up to them to include in their Constitution if/when mothers have the right to choose to kill their unborn child. Of course, we all know how the Iraqis will vote. But they should be allowed to vote. They can handle this issue easilly enough before getting into other issues. The life of an unborn child is, of course, infinitely precious. Who would argue with that?
8 posted on 05/01/2003 3:06:29 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (LIBERTY or DEATH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madfly; SJackson; MeeknMing; backhoe; doug from upland
I thought you might be interested in this. Bush should call the shots here. His soldiers are the ones who would pay the ultimate price for makiing the wrong choice on this issue. The Iraqis need to have a chance to vote on this and cement it in their Constitution. Top of the list priority. Puts UN and pro-abortionists on the defensive.
9 posted on 05/01/2003 3:11:25 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March (LIBERTY or DEATH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
The ghouls can't wait to come out of the woodwork, can they?

Arthur, I agree... and as I recall, this garbage of "providing abortion services" was a big part of out Bosnian misadventure, too. It's absolutely disgusting.

10 posted on 05/01/2003 3:50:52 AM PDT by backhoe (Just an old keyboard cowboy, ridin' the trackball into the sunset...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Once again, liberals are out of touch with the various "cultures" of the world they claim to value so much. Islam, and by extention, Islamic society, tends to oppose abortion. Providing "abortion services" might be viewed by many in the region as an attempt at genocide on our part.

Dangerous stuff...
11 posted on 05/01/2003 3:58:33 AM PDT by MWS (Errare humanum est, in errore perservare stultum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MWS
Providing "abortion services" might be viewed by many in the region as an attempt at genocide on our part.

This is a very important point, and I hope we can keep the "women's health services" (euphemism for abortion and sterilization) people out of this.

A couple of months ago, three Protestant missionaries who worked in a health clinic were killed by a Muslim fanatic. He said he killed them because, in addition to preaching Christianity, they were sterilizing women. I don't know if they were or not. I hope it was just a smear and that they weren't considering routine sterilization to be an okay part of "health services." But whether it was true or not, it reveals the feelings that such activities could stir up.

12 posted on 05/01/2003 5:13:19 AM PDT by livius (Let slip the cats of conjecture.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Bishop Ibrahim N. Ibrahim of the Chaldean Diocese of St. Thomas the Apostle in Southfield, Mich., said the Iraqi people would not accept abortion. "Christians are against these things and the Muslims are against them, too," he said.

So they will be forced to attend diversity celebrations and sensitivity training to get truly liberated.

13 posted on 05/01/2003 5:16:16 AM PDT by A. Pole
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MWS
Not just dangerous - it's rather imperialist of libs to attempt to export our abortion culture to Iraq, eh?
14 posted on 05/01/2003 5:29:09 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Well, that didn't take long. Sooner or later the people who provide the services of the pro-death camp in places like Iraq and Afghanistan are going to feel the wrath of those people and they are going to wonder why.

The UN needs to be abolished. At this point, it's not serving any purpose other than allowing delegates to live in the US with diplomatic immunity. It's impeding us in more ways than helping.
15 posted on 05/01/2003 6:04:40 AM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
Imagine moving the UN to another country like Switzerland. Hundreds of spies would be put out of work.
16 posted on 05/01/2003 6:35:34 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult ("Read Hillary's hips. I never had sex with that woman.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Hillarys Gate Cult
Imagine moving the UN to another country like Switzerland. Hundreds of spies would be put out of work.

In Switzerland? Have things in the spy world changed that much?
17 posted on 05/01/2003 6:37:43 AM PDT by Desdemona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
The spies inbedded in the UN in NYC would become excess elsewhere. I didn't say all spies would lose their jobs, just that there would be no need for them as their purpose is to freely roam the US. These other countries will still have their intel people working out of their embassies here, just less of them.
18 posted on 05/01/2003 6:46:00 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult ("Read Hillary's hips. I never had sex with that woman.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Ahban
ping
19 posted on 05/01/2003 6:56:08 AM PDT by thelastonestanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
The most fundamental freedom is the freedom of reproductive self-determination

Funny that none of our founding fathers, nor any of the ancient political philosophers/statesmen that preceeded them, ever mentioned this “most fundamental freedom.”

I guess it was so obvious to everyone that baby killing was the basis for western concepts of personal liberty, they never felt the need to state it aloud.

20 posted on 05/01/2003 7:20:52 AM PDT by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson