Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hollywood anti-war set needs some new lines
Chicago Sun-Times ^ | 4-8-03 | Richard Roeper

Posted on 04/08/2003 3:44:25 AM PDT by Prince Charles

Hollywood anti-war set needs some new lines

April 8, 2003

BY RICHARD ROEPER SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST

TO: Jennifer Aniston, George Clooney, Sheryl Crow, David Duchovny, Janeane Garofalo, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Woody Harrelson, Jessica Lange, Michael Moore, Edward Norton, Sean Penn, Tim Robbins, Susan Sarandon, Martin Sheen, Eddie Vedder, et al.

RE: Operation Iraqi Freedom

Dear Celebrity Anti-War Activist: Over the last several weeks and months, you have used your status as a person of fame to tell the world you're against the war with Iraq, which you believe to be unwarranted, unethical, unconstitutional and un-American. Some of you have said you "hate" President George W. Bush (hello, Jessica Lange!), while others have expressed mere contempt for the president and his policies.

Even though you are among the luckiest and best-rewarded human beings in the history of civilization, you have moaned long and loud about life in the oppressive United States of America. And you have complained that free speech is practically an endangered species--though it's not as if you've been kidnapped, bound and gagged for expressing your views.

You have talked about how ashamed you are to be an American. You have said you believe this is a war for oil conducted by a power-hungry simpleton in the White House.

You have given speeches at awards ceremonies. You've marched in the streets and held forth at anti-war rallies. You've gone on talk shows and you've written op-ed pieces and you've signed letters and you've flashed the peace sign every time you've gone out in public.

Even after the fighting began and U.S. troops started risking their lives to fight for the very freedoms you've been enjoying--including the right to speak out against government policies--you refused to let the drumbeats of war drown out your voices of dissent.

Fine. You've made your point. And if you want to keep on with the the marching and the protesting and the grandstanding and the speech-making, well God bless America, that's your right.

But I'm just wondering: If you're such a crusader for kindness and decency and the rules of fair play, when are you going to say something about the atrocities committed by Iraqis since this war broke out?

Stop right there. I can already hear you launching into your well-practiced diatribe about how none of these things would be happening in the first place if not for that warmonger Bush--but that doesn't answer my question. My question is, why are you not condemning the unconscionable acts of terrorism committed by Iraqis?

Since the fighting began, American troops have conducted themselves with much honor and courage and have engaged in the traditional rules of war. We've seen story after story about U.S. troops coming to the aid of wounded enemy soldiers, image after image of Americans comforting Iraqi children, quote after quote from American troops expressing deep regret after killing soldiers and civilians who would not surrender or kept charging, even after repeated warnings.

On the other side, some Iraqi soldiers have posed as civilians and faked surrender in order to ambush allied forces. Then there are the suicide terrorists, like the noncommissioned Iraqi officer in civilian clothes who pretended to be a taxi driver and waved to U.S. soldiers for help--only to blow himself up and take four American soldiers with him. We've also seen American POWs mistreated on Iraq TV.

The Fedayeen have been known to use civilians, even children, as human shields. They stage military operations from hospitals. In one incident, Iraqi soldiers fired at a U.S. helicopter that was evacuating wounded Iraqis.

Even if you believe we have no business being in Iraq, you can't possibly endorse any of the tactics used by a significant percentage of Iraqis. They are cowards and they are scum and they are war criminals.

So, Ms. Garofalo and Mr. Sheen and Mr. Moore and Mr. Robbins: Why not hold a press conference to condemn these acts? How about taking out ads in USA Today and the New York Times so you can sign your names to a petition expressing your outrage at this behavior? How about donating your talents to a fund-raiser for the families of fallen American soldiers? At the very least you can update your anti-war speeches to include words of praise for the likes of Jessica Lynch, and words of protest against the Iraqi thugs.

I'm not asking you to march in the streets of Baghdad to protest these atrocities. You can make your point from the comfort and safety of your home turf--the same launching point for all your verbal missiles against the American government.

It won't mean you're against the war. It'll just mean you have a sense of perspective and honor, and that your hatred and contempt isn't reserved exclusively for the president of the United States.

War criminals need loathing, too. Don't be afraid to say it.

Sincerely,

Richard Roeper

"Ebert & Roeper" airs at 10:35 p.m. Saturday and 10:30 a.m. Sunday on WLS-Channel 7.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: davidduchovny; eddievedder; edwardnorton; georgeclooney; hollywood; iraq; janeanegarofalo; jenniferaniston; jessicalange; leftist; maggiegyllenhaal; martinsheen; michaelmoore; protester; seanpenn; sherylcrow; susansarandon; timrobbins; traitor; treason; war; woodyharrelson

1 posted on 04/08/2003 3:44:25 AM PDT by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Hear, hear!
2 posted on 04/08/2003 3:47:03 AM PDT by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
Thanks for posting this. Good article.
3 posted on 04/08/2003 3:47:52 AM PDT by paulklenk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
Good article - too bad it will fall on deaf ears.
4 posted on 04/08/2003 3:50:14 AM PDT by Keith in Iowa (* * Common Sense is an Oxymoron * *)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
To the point! I bet Roger Ebert peed his prissy little panties when he read this.
5 posted on 04/08/2003 3:53:28 AM PDT by RushLake (Omaha, Utah, Carentan, Liberation of Paris--naw we've never done anything for the frogs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
Roeper has been a gem ....In his appearance on Jay Leno after the Oscars he said that everyone stood up to applaud Roman Polanski's win because they were "looking for subpoenas under their seats."

On the other hand, Ebert expressed the wish that Roger Moore would win an Oscar because he wanted to hear his anti-war rant.

Ebert will soon retire, and Roeper will become the permier movie critic ....let's hope sooner rather than later.
6 posted on 04/08/2003 4:07:35 AM PDT by PoisedWoman (Fed up with the liberal media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoisedWoman
Roger Ebert is the other BFI.
7 posted on 04/08/2003 4:11:47 AM PDT by Rocko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rocko
Another great quote from Roeper: "I don't want to listen to Hollywood people comment on the war any more than I want to read movie reviews by Trent Lott."

BFI is big fat idiot? Or?
8 posted on 04/08/2003 4:18:12 AM PDT by PoisedWoman (Fed up with the liberal media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
When push comes to shove, though, Roeper will always end up kissing Hollywood ass. Read him for the next week or so and he'll write a column to "make up" for this one.
9 posted on 04/08/2003 4:35:19 AM PDT by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
Sure hope when this war has been won that America doesn't forget what this bunch of line readers did.

Received a call from Hollywood last night asking to participate in a survey. Said yes, first question was "had I been to a local theater in last two month?"

Answer: NO.

Next question was there anyone in household that had.

Answer: Children at college might have gone.

Then told her that I would not be supporting the liberal socialist agenda by paying money to see their trash.

Got a quick "thank-you" good-by.
10 posted on 04/08/2003 4:46:30 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
Maggie Gyllenhaal

Bummer. She's hot!

11 posted on 04/08/2003 12:43:04 PM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoisedWoman
BFI = big fat idiot.
12 posted on 04/08/2003 4:11:09 PM PDT by Rocko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
Here they are;

THE PETITON LETTER TO: President Bush SUBJECT: Artists Say Win Without War

War talk in Washington is alarming and unnecessary. We are patriotic Americans who share the belief that Saddam Hussein cannot be allowed to possess weapons of mass destruction. We support rigorous UN weapons inspections to assure Iraq's effective disarmament. However, a pre-emptive military invasion of Iraq will harm American national interests . Such a war will increase human suffering, arouse animosity toward our country, increase the likelihood of terrorist attacks, damage the economy, and undermine our moral standing in the world. It will make us less, not more, secure. We reject the doctrine--a reversal of long-held American tradition--that our country, alone, has the right to launch first-strike attacks. The valid U.S. and UN objective of disarming Saddam Hussein can be achieved through legal diplomatic means. There is no need for war. Let us instead devote our resources to improving the security and well-being of people here at home and around the world. Signed,

Artists for Winning Without War Mike Farrell, Co-Chair Robert Greenwald, Co-Chair Gillian Anderson Edward Asner Rene Auberjonois David Bale Kim Basinger Ed Begley, Jr. Theo Bikel Barbara Bosson Jackson Browne Peter Buck (REM) Diahann Carroll Eugene J. Carroll, Jr., Rear Adm. U.S. Navy (Ret.) Kathleen Chalfant Don Cheadle Jill Clayburgh David Clennon Jack Coleman Peter Coyote Lindsay Crouse Suzanne Cryer Matt Damon Dana Daurey Ambassador Jonathan Dean (U.S. Rep. to NATO Warsaw Pact) Vincent D’Onofrio David Duchovny Olympia Dukakis Charles S. Dutton Hector Elizondo Cary Elwes Shelley Fabares Mike Farrell Mia Farrow Laurence Fishburne Sean Patrick Flanery Bonnie Franklin John Fugelsang Jeananne Garafalo Larry Gelbart Melissa Gilbert Danny Glover Elliott Gould Samaria Graham Robert Greenwald Robert Guillaume Paul Haggis Robert David Hall Ethan Hawke Ken Howard Helen Hunt Anjelica Huston LaTanya Richardson Jackson Samuel L. Jackson Jane Kaczmarek Melina Kanakaredes Casey Kasem Mimi Kennedy Jessica Lange Tea Leoni Wendie Malick Camryn Manheim Marsha Mason Richard Masur Dave Matthews Kent McCord Robert Duncan McNeill Mike Mills (REM) Janel Moloney Esai Morales Ed O'’Neill Chris Noth Peter Onorati Alexandra Paul Ambassador Edward Peck (former U.S. Ambassador to Iraq) Seth Peterson CCH Pounder David Rabe Alan Rachins Bonnie Raitt Carl Reiner Tim Robbins Steve Robinson, Sgt., U.S. Army (Ret.) Mitch Ryan Susan Sarandon Tony Shalhoub Jack Shanahan, Vice Adm. U.S. Navy (Ret.) William Schallert Martin Sheen Armin Shimerman Gloria Steinem Marcia Strassman Michael Stipe (REM) Susan Sullivan Loretta Swit Studs Terkel Lily Tomlin Blair Underwood Dennis Weaver Bradley Whitford James Whitmore James Whitmore, Jr. Alfre Woodard Noah Wyle Peter Yarrow Howard Zinn

Never forget how these so called "patriotic Americans" would leave the children and innocent of Iraq to be tortured, butcheres and murdered under the tyranny of Saddam Hussein. How sad.

13 posted on 04/09/2003 6:58:08 PM PDT by Magoo (Freedom!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
Uh oh...Roger Ebert is not going to like this.
14 posted on 04/09/2003 7:01:13 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoisedWoman
Please don't insult Roger Moore by mixing him up with that buffoon, Michael Moore.
15 posted on 04/09/2003 7:02:09 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
That moved me. It was wonderful. Thank you for posting it.
16 posted on 05/07/2003 8:30:46 PM PDT by OREALLY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OREALLY
My pleasure. :)
17 posted on 05/07/2003 10:41:58 PM PDT by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
Richard Roeper is the other half of the Hollywood movie review show Ebert&Roeper . He's the conservative to the liberal (Yes, they both write for the same newspaper) Roger Ebert. So if you ever watch the show, remember the guy who wrote this fine op-ed. Since he knows what's he talking about, you can trust his views as which movies are watchable and which go in the trashcan.
18 posted on 05/07/2003 10:46:45 PM PDT by goldstategop ( In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prince Charles
When also will the left who are so concerned about Sept 11th hold Bill Clinton and Al Gore accountable for their appeasment of terrorists in their 8 year administration that certainly contributed to the attack on our country?
19 posted on 05/07/2003 10:49:35 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
Umm, when hell freezes over?

Regards.

20 posted on 05/07/2003 10:51:37 PM PDT by Prince Charles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson