Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Peter Arnett ( Takes credit for American Opposition to the War ) A MUST READ
3-30-2003

Posted on 03/30/2003 3:16:09 PM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs

JOHN GIBSON: "Peter Arnett, who is now employed as a correspondant by National Georgraphic Television, was interviewed by one of Iraq's Information Ministers on Iraq State TV.

He began interviewing Arnett about what is going on in Iraq and what is going on in America about the war.

What Peter Arnett said is that it is clear that is going on in the US is clear that there is a growing challange of Bush's conduct of the war and then Arnett seemed to take credit for that, by saying that HIS reports from Iraq are helping opposition grow. "

ARNETT:" It is clear that within the United States that there is growing challenge to President Bush and he conduct about the war. And it is clear that our reports here about the Iraqi civilian casualties in the war, and the resistance of the Iraqi forces, are going back to the United States, and it helps those who oppose the war and challenge the policies to develop their arguments. "

So Arnett did not acknowldege what is a Pentagon claim, that the Iraqi casualties could be from Iraqi missiles which are errant missiles which are falling back down on their own Iraqi population. But Arnett went on to claim credit for growing opposition in the United States, but claimed that the Pentagon's War is a failure.

ARNETT: "Now America is reappraising the battlefield plan and delaying the war, for maybe a week. The first war plan has failed because of Iraqi resistance. Now they are trying to write another war plan. "

Of course Peter Arnett is now working for the National Georgraphic program, he has a deal with NBC and appears on another cable network. He has been allowed to do whatever he wants. This while other news agencies have been kicked out of Iraq, including Fox News Channel and CNN. And in addition the Newsday Newspapers has two reporters missing and assumed to be held by authorities in Iraq, yet Peter Arnett is allowed to stay. I guess that we can come to our own conclusions, it appears that Peter Arnett is now operating in Iraq and doing Iraq great favors by his own estimation, in organizing opposition to the war, here in this country, in the United States by his reports, and by giving the Iraqis a growing sense of nationalism, because by his accounts, the initial war plan has failed, and the Iraqi opposition has sent the war planners back to the drawing board.

So there you have it, Peter Arnett in Iraq.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: enemywithin; ignorantdupe; iraqifreedom; jackass; nationalgeorgraphic; stoogefortheenemy; traitor; warcorrespondent; warlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 541-555 next last
To: The Real Eddie01

441 posted on 03/30/2003 5:44:40 PM PST by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: jaycee
CNN has decided to drop Peter Arnett, two newspapers reported.

That piece was written before they fired him, of course.

442 posted on 03/30/2003 5:44:42 PM PST by merrin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: ChadGore
How do I get Outlook Express to send this email? It says the addressees are not in my address book. I have the email prepared and read to go--help.
443 posted on 03/30/2003 5:44:58 PM PST by Pushi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
Arnett's treasonous tongue is mightier and bloodier than any sword.

Would one of Sen. Lindsey Graham's constituents please drop a letter to the good senator? Let him take the lead in Wash DC on this treason.

444 posted on 03/30/2003 5:45:04 PM PST by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 434 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
The AMs have yanked every Arnett thread from Breaking News....why?....I have no idea.
445 posted on 03/30/2003 5:45:20 PM PST by wardaddy (G-d speed our fighters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies]

To: Big Horn
May have to sell my GE stock. Not a good time for it.
446 posted on 03/30/2003 5:46:54 PM PST by Pushi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: SandyInSeattle
Yes, you abso*#~^%lutely!
447 posted on 03/30/2003 5:47:50 PM PST by gcruse (If they truly are God's laws, he can enforce them himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Thank you very much for this ugly picture of the ugliest man around with the ugliest personality possible. Is there any way you can send him this picture? Ohhhhh" it almost makes me sick.
448 posted on 03/30/2003 5:49:06 PM PST by jaycee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies]

To: ijcr
>>Many folks posting here do not realise that Peter is a CIA
operative tasked with infiltrating Saddam's inner circle.

Thankfully, this is a private website and we should keep this hush hush. If the Iraqi authorities even get a hint of his alter ego then his life would not be worth a plugged nickel.

By gaining access to Saddam, Peter's role in ending the war
will be invaluable. Please do not reveal his true intentions as walls have ears. <<

Had an Aunt Bertha who thought that she was Mata Hari...t'would dance around the livin' room nekkid....

Lets hope Pete doesn't do the same..... ;)
449 posted on 03/30/2003 5:51:28 PM PST by najida (Ignorance is temporary, but stupidity is forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
Here, here, sweetliberty! I'm with you! Also the musclebound, blondish guy covering CentCom for Fox (I forget his name, but he usually wears a light blue shirt, no jacket).

Cheers!
450 posted on 03/30/2003 5:52:13 PM PST by left-handed_right-minded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Iraqi TV interviews Arnett

32 minutes ago

By Andrew Grossman

NEW YORK (The Hollywood Reporter) --- NBC News is standing by correspondent Peter Arnett after he gave an interview to Iraqi TV in which he said the Bush administration had misjudged "the determination of the Iraqi armed forces and the government's willingness to fight for their country."

Arnett, who is reporting for NBC and MSNBC through his role as a correspondent for National Geographic (news - web sites) Explorer, also seemed to have nice things to say about Iraqi's Ministry of Information, saying it had "allowed me and many other reporters to cover 12 whole years since the Gulf War (news - web sites) with a degree which we appreciate and this is continuing today," according to reports on Sunday.

He said U.S. military officials are preparing a "new war plan."

Iraqi TV aired the interview Sunday, but it is uncertain when it took place.

Arnett is one of the few American broadcast reporters remaining in Baghdad. The government expelled two CNN reporters on March 20 for unexplained reasons as well as a Fox News Channel correspondent in February.

Other American television reporters left of their own volition when the war began.

NBC said in a statement that "Peter Arnett and his crew have risked their lives to bring the American people up-to-date, straightforward information on what is happening in and around Baghdad. His impromptu interview with Iraqi TV was done as a professional courtesy and was similar to other interviews he has done with media outlets from around the world. His remarks were analytical in nature and were not intended to be anything more."

NBC said Arnett would continue to report for the company.

Fallout from Arnett's remarks are likely to focus as much on the venue -- that he gave an interview to an enemy media outlet -- as his remarks, much of which were similar to what he has told other media outlets in the U.S. and abroad.

Arnett is a Pulitzer Prize-winner who was the only television reporter on the scene -- for CNN -- in 1991 when bombs fell on Baghdad.

In an article in Sunday's New York Times, Arnett is quoted as saying that the Iraqi deputy prime minister had warned him in an interview two weeks ago -- in a report that NBC News did not air -- that his people would resist American and British forces, saying "We're ready to be martyrs."

"It's deja vu all over again, the idea that this would be a walkover, the idea that the people of Basra would throw flowers at the Marines," Arnett told the Times's Frank Rich.

He told Iraqi television "Whenever I gave a report (in 1991) of civilian casualties or civilian installations destroyed and casualties created, the Pentagon (news - web sites) and Bush administration got very angry and called me a traitor."

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

451 posted on 03/30/2003 5:54:26 PM PST by Timesink (If you use the word "embedded" in a conversation, you'd better be carrying an x-ray to show me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 427 | View Replies]

To: Reborn
Isn't Arnett "embedded" with our troops? Sheesh, I vote that he be sent back home, without any escort from our troops! Give him a donkey and let him find the way back home.

No, he isn't. Arnett is working for National Geographic, and on a contract basis for MSNBC.

This shouldn't really surprise anybody. In addition to his aiding and abetting during the last war, you may recall he was actually fired from CNN for peddling a story [that had no foundation] claiming the US military had used nerve gas.

If memory serves, his producer and several related lackeys were fired immediately by CNN after they failed to produce any evidence corroborating the story. Arnett claimed he was just a news reader and had nothing to do with it, but he was eventually dropped as well. So, the little rat didn't even have the stones to stand by his own reporting.

452 posted on 03/30/2003 5:54:39 PM PST by FredZarguna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: dep
<> I heard that! She also called him pathetic. I can't remember hearing a reporter being ripped apart to the extent he has been by his collegues in the last couple of hours. T'was fun to watch and hear.
453 posted on 03/30/2003 5:56:51 PM PST by najida (Ignorance is temporary, but stupidity is forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
I love how they cover up the worst parts.

That doesn't work any more.

454 posted on 03/30/2003 5:56:58 PM PST by merrin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies]

To: Endeavor
There still is plausibilty in the story, timing is everything.

'Sides - weren't my story.

455 posted on 03/30/2003 5:57:21 PM PST by Happy2BMe (HOLLYWOOD:Ask not what U can do for your country, ask what U can do for Iraq!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 421 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo

Eddie01 "We observe Peter ordering eggs Benedict"

456 posted on 03/30/2003 5:57:36 PM PST by The Real Eddie01 (Liberals lie about everything all the time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 441 | View Replies]

To: merrin
Thanks for speedy reply........
457 posted on 03/30/2003 5:58:46 PM PST by jaycee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 442 | View Replies]

To: AHerald
Thanks for link Five Years Later, the Gulf War Story Is Still Being Told.
How arrogant he was then (and now):
The New York Times May 12, 1996: Arnett states: "If we'd had the immediacy in Vietnam that we had in the gulf war, it would have changed history," said Mr. Arnett, 61, who was the only Western correspondent in Baghdad for most of the war. "The Vietnam War could not have lasted as long as it did."

Perhaps finally in this case his current outrageous statements will change his own history.

458 posted on 03/30/2003 5:59:07 PM PST by bwteim (bwteim=Begin With The End In Mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: wardaddy
The AMs have yanked every Arnett thread from Breaking News....why?....I have no idea.

The AMs should contact Rita Cosby and John Gibson and let them know that this is a non-story.

459 posted on 03/30/2003 5:59:25 PM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs (May all of Saddam's virgins look like Helen Thomas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies]

To: jaycee
Is there any way you can send him this picture? Ohhhhh" it almost makes me sick.

Sorry 'bout that. If I had his e-mail address, I WOULD . . .

460 posted on 03/30/2003 6:00:09 PM PST by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Saddam! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 448 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 541-555 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson