Skip to comments.
Ruins of 4,300-year-old prehistoric city found in China
ABC ^
| Thursday, January 23, 2003. Posted: 21:01:28 (AEDT)
| Editorial Staff
Posted on 01/23/2003 2:54:23 PM PST by vannrox
ABC Online
Ruins of 4,300-year-old prehistoric city found in China. 23/1/2003. ABC News Online
[This is the print version of story http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/s768954.htm]
Thursday, January 23, 2003. Posted: 21:01:28 (AEDT)
Ruins of 4,300-year-old prehistoric city found in China
Chinese archaeologists have discovered the ruins of a prehistoric city dating back an estimated 4,300 years in southwest Sichuan province, state press said.
The find provided evidence that the region along the upper reaches of the Yangtze River, with the Chengdu Plain at the core, played an important role in the origin and development of Chinese civilization, experts said.
The ancient city of Yandian measures 700 metres from north to south and 500 metres from east to west, the Xinhua news agency reported.
It covers an area of more than 300,000 square metres.
Chen Jian, an official with the relics and archaeological team in the Sichuan capital Chengdu City, said the site is next to a river at an elevation of three metres above the river bank.
This indicated that ancient people considered the availability of water and flood prevention when deciding where to build cities, he said.
Archaeologists unearthed a number of pieces of inscribed pottery, polished stone axes, chisels and spears at the site.
They also found chips of human skulls on the city wall but were unable to explain how they got there.
© ABC 2002 | privacy
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ancient; archaeology; china; city; discovery; find; ggg; godsgravesglyphs; history; old; past
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
WOW! Very Exciting!
1
posted on
01/23/2003 2:54:23 PM PST
by
vannrox
To: vannrox
"They also found chips of human skulls on the city wall but were unable to explain how they got there."
The remains of defenders/attackers in the last battle that city saw, or else criminal's heads on pikes.
2
posted on
01/23/2003 2:57:26 PM PST
by
RonF
To: vannrox; blam
This indicated that ancient people considered the availability of water and flood prevention when deciding where to build cities, he said. This bit of ancillary information suggests that this city was probably part of an existing civilization.
3
posted on
01/23/2003 2:58:08 PM PST
by
r9etb
To: vannrox
Very cool!
To: vannrox
It covers an area of more than 300,000 square metres That's not a city ... that's a large Sam's Club
5
posted on
01/23/2003 2:59:44 PM PST
by
Centurion2000
(The meek shall inherit the Earth. The stars belong to the bold.)
To: vannrox
chips of human skulls on the city wall A definite sign of civilization.
To: vannrox
He was found holding on to a dozen menues from Chans Dragon Inn ( It is believed he was distributing these at the time of his death)
7
posted on
01/23/2003 3:04:56 PM PST
by
since1868
To: vannrox
This must harken back to the dynasty that supposedly predates the Shang( also was thought to be a myth).
8
posted on
01/23/2003 3:13:15 PM PST
by
weikel
(Screw the dems im tired of the lesser evil Its the greens socialist and hardcore commies from now on)
To: RonF
Also possible that mud for walls was dug from spots that contained skulls of townspeople or enemies, or previous inhabitants of area where town was built.
9
posted on
01/23/2003 3:24:38 PM PST
by
UCANSEE2
To: UCANSEE2
"Also possible that mud for walls was dug from spots that contained skulls of townspeople or enemies, or previous inhabitants of area where town was built." Good thinking. I like the 'heads-on-spikes' idea best.
10
posted on
01/23/2003 3:38:15 PM PST
by
blam
To: blam
2300 BC is well before the dating of the Shang Dynasty. What is the name of the (legendary?) dynasty that supposedly preceded the Shang?
In any case, I don't think China extended as far as southwest Szechuan province until thousands of years later.
To: aristeides
*Xia Dynasty: 2100-1600BC
*Shang Dynasty: 1600-1066BC
12
posted on
01/23/2003 3:53:08 PM PST
by
blam
To: aristeides
And with revelations that mummified bodies have been found in China with Blonde hair and blue eyes, wouldn't it be interesting if the same were found in this ancient city !?!?!??!?!?
13
posted on
01/23/2003 3:53:16 PM PST
by
UCANSEE2
To: UCANSEE2
"And with revelations that mummified bodies have been found in China with Blonde hair and blue eyes, wouldn't it be interesting if the same were found in this ancient city !?!?!??!?!?" Wouldn't suprise me. Afterall, the Jomon and the Ainu had to come through there at some time in the past.
14
posted on
01/23/2003 3:58:47 PM PST
by
blam
To: UCANSEE2
And buried with what appear to be the remains of plaid cloth.
However, I think those mummies were buried in Sinkiang, the province of northwest China that is largely inhabited by Turkic peoples. Are those mummies dated?
To: aristeides
Many were from the top of a mountain somewhere (gee, might they be the real family from Noah's ark?), and I don't remember the calculated age. Sorry.
16
posted on
01/23/2003 4:05:19 PM PST
by
UCANSEE2
To: UCANSEE2
Cherchen Man
17
posted on
01/23/2003 4:05:41 PM PST
by
blam
To: All
Misinfo. Not top of mountain. I believe they were up near or above the frost line.
18
posted on
01/23/2003 4:06:24 PM PST
by
UCANSEE2
To: aristeides
Caucasian Buddhists
19
posted on
01/23/2003 4:09:56 PM PST
by
blam
To: UCANSEE2
"The American anthropologist C. Loring Brace, University of Michigan, (Science Frontiers #65, Sep-Oct 1989) reported that "pure-blooded Ainu are easy to spot: they have lighter skin, more body hair, and higher-bridged noses than most Japanese." Brace studied the skeletons of about 1100 Japanese, Ainu, and other Asian ethnic groups and has concluded that the revered samurai of Japan are actually descendants of the Ainu, not of the Yayoi (original Mongolian) from whom most modern Japanese are descended. Brace said further that "...this explains why the facial features of the Japanese ruling class are so often unlike those of typical modern Japanese. The Ainu-related samurai achieved such power and prestige in medieval Japan that they intermarried with royalty and nobility, passing on Ainu blood in the upper classes, while other Japanese were primarily descended from the Yayoi." Some have said that the practice of 'white-face' among the Japanese is to emulate their ancient rulers. There are ancient paintings of the samurai that the Japanese keep hidden...they're caucasian.
20
posted on
01/23/2003 4:20:42 PM PST
by
blam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson