Skip to comments.
Cal Thomas on Fox just nailed a PETA Doctor!
FOX News
| 12/26/02
| me
Posted on 12/26/2002 5:56:36 PM PST by therut
Did anyone else see Cal Thomas(filling in for O'Reiley) slam the physician about the school luch programs. This was the same physician that was on the Washington Journal this a.m. talking about suing the fast food industries and wanting to take meat,milk and cheese out of the school lunch programs. He sounded real good this morning. Well Cal brought out that his spouse who he filed his tax returns with was the president of PETA. He denied he had a spouse but not that he filed tax return with "someone" as a spouse or that they are the president of PETA. He got kinda shook up. Cal also brought out that his group had received over a million dollars from PETA in donations. Wonder who his so called un-married spouse is??? The animal rights groups are atacking at the school level now. Kinda like the anti-gun and anti- everything left is getting more control of our society very slyly.
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: peta; schoollunches; suingfastfood
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
1
posted on
12/26/2002 5:56:36 PM PST
by
therut
To: therut
vegans sux0r
2
posted on
12/26/2002 6:00:06 PM PST
by
Maedhros
To: therut
I must have just missed it
To: therut
I saw that, too. I was busy fixing dinner for Free State One and Two so I wasn't hanging on every word, but he was very, very evasive and it was a very Clintonian moment. There was obvious obfuscation.
To: therut
Wonder who his so called un-married spouse is???Ingrid Newkirk.
He's Neal Barnard.
They're quite a couple. They are involved in numerous animal rights/anti-animal research/vegetarian organizations.
To: therut
There's supposed to be some statistical basis to the statement that vegetarians don't live quite as long as those of us who follow our evolutionary pattern of eating meat and drinking milk.
This is proper, IMHO.
6
posted on
12/26/2002 6:15:28 PM PST
by
Marauder
To: sistergoldenhair
I saw both shows. This is a good illustration of C-SPAN and it idiotic selection of guests. Washington Journal is no more than a liberal, BORING, joke. Of the many I knew years ago who were C-SPAN junkies, including me, noone remains a viewer. It's sad how they've taken a good idea and ruined it with politically correct phone lines and producers.
I'm still a fan but only of some BOOKNOTES. Other than that, both their channels are dead in my house.
To: Marauder
If God didn't intend for us to eat animals, why did He make them out of meat?
8
posted on
12/26/2002 6:22:32 PM PST
by
the_doc
To: SouthCarolinaKit
I saw both shows.
Other than that, both their channels are dead in my house.I only saw the Fox program as CSPAN is dead at my house, too.
To: therut
And here is the rub. They lie about what their goal is when they sue the fast food companies. They say it is about health but it isn't. You look, and you see the rabid animal-rights groups behind them.
But then you apply that same logic, and you wonder if the radical animal rights groups are telling the truth about what their goal is. They say it is out of compassion for animals, but then they lie about why they file suits so what is not to say they are lying about what their real agenda is?
Because if you look deep enough, you will find the same old socialist/collectivist agenda.
To: the_doc
LMBO...that's twice today you've cracked me up.
11
posted on
12/26/2002 6:41:45 PM PST
by
Dallas
To: the_doc
Where did I recently read about someone asking a 'vegan'----- why if they love vegetables so much, that they eat them?
12
posted on
12/26/2002 6:47:31 PM PST
by
Exit148
To: therut
Didn't see it but will watch the rerun.
To: therut
He denied he had a spouse but not that he filed tax return with "someone" as a spouse or that they are the president of PETA.If I was unmarried and was filing joint tax returns with someone as married, I doubt that I would admit it on national TV. Someone from the IRS might just be watching.
14
posted on
12/26/2002 7:00:35 PM PST
by
templar
To: Free State Four
Guess I'll catch the rerun later. Haven't watched any tv tonight.
15
posted on
12/26/2002 7:12:03 PM PST
by
barker
To: Maedhros
Cal also nailed him on the denial that he was charged with unethical behavior by the AMA. Claimed it was 6 years ago so it didn't matter. Cal asked him if he was more ethical now and then proceeded to nail him in lie after lie. Liberals believe the truth isn't important if it furthers their communistic causes. Cal made mincemeat out of this vegan!
Pray for GW and our Troops
16
posted on
12/26/2002 7:18:01 PM PST
by
bray
To: templar
That was so odd I had to read it twice . Good point .
17
posted on
12/26/2002 7:20:13 PM PST
by
Ben Bolt
To: sistergoldenhair
Mine too!
18
posted on
12/26/2002 7:25:55 PM PST
by
VOYAGER
To: therut
I didn't see it, but it is great to see all of those liberal guests on FNC and the look of shock on their faces when they realize that someone is actually questioning them on their ranting. They are so used to being given a pass on what they say.
To: bray
I was very impressed with Cal Thomas, he doesn't let up or let them get away with anything! They had a brief shot of the 'vegan' doctor still trying to say something when he was cut off!
20
posted on
12/26/2002 7:33:22 PM PST
by
potlatch
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-86 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson