Posted on 12/02/2002 3:59:11 PM PST by Z in Oregon
With the late-January anniversary of Roe vs Wade approaching, the pro-abortion, anti-baby, empathy-free feminists are expected to bring a cake to several University campuses and then hand it out to other pro-abortion, anti-baby, empathy-free feminists.
They do the "abortion is good, now eat this cake" deal every year. It's profoundly macabre. What manner of being celebrates the deliberately-caused abortion deaths of innocent, vulnerable, defenseless little prenatal babies? The annual pro-abortion table gets sponsored by the deeply toxic male-bashing feminist sector of society. Feminism, a movement based upon an insatiable appetite for destruction of innocent life, will be offering stock slogans and soundbites while ghoulishly relishing cake with conscience-free minds.
Their utilitarianism, their willingness to kill innocence, is wrong. Evidence of what abortion death does to the baby being aborted is readily available for everyone who can handle the truth. Check out the "pictures" link at www.abortiontv.com on the Internet. What human could do that to innocent babies?
No prenatal baby ever wants to die.
In nature, there is no right to kill innocent, defenseless, never-hurt-anyone infants. Yet, feminism is a pro-violence, deeply cruel movement based upon the unspeakably brutal, cold hunger of those in NOW, NARAL, etc. to kill the very members of society who should be protected the most:
Innocent, vulnerable, defenseless little prenatal babies. The pro-abortion cake thing has deep ideological roots. It eerily echoes the Nazi practice of giving jam-covered bread to German children as incentive to get on the death camp trains headed to Auschwitz and Treblinka. Not surprisingly, the founder of pro-abortion Planned Parenthood was ideologically in sync with Hitler's Third Reich.
In 1933, with Hitler's power rising, Margaret Sanger's paper printed an article called "Eugenics: an Urgent Need." The author was a close, ideologically-aligned cohort of Sanger's. His name was Ernst Rudin. Ernst Rudin served Adolph Hitler as the director of Hitler's "Medical Experimentation Program".
Adolph Hitler contended that some groups had the right to kill others, telling his followers to "rid the earth of dysgenic peoples by whatever means available."
"Dysgenic" is a word that had been popularized internationally, years earlier, by pro-abortion Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger. Like Hitler's brutally utilitarian Nazi "doctors", Sanger was a eugenicist. She believed in dehumanizing certain groups of people; thus, by virtue of that dehumanization, "justifying" the deaths of persons in those groups.
That is done by her ideological heirs in the pro-abortion movement of 2003 every day. They strive militantly to dehumanize innocent little prenatal babies and thus, by virtue of that dehumanization, "justify" killing them. Sanger once wrote, "The most merciful thing a large family can do to one of its infant members is to kill it."
Over at Princeton, current professor Peter Singer echoes these views. He advocates the decriminalization of infanticide, arguing that a society which permits aborting little prenatal babies should not blanch at killing newborns.
Indeed, Singer advocates killing handicapped newborns. An opponent of his, another current professor at Princeton, acknowledges the undeniable infanticide-abortion link.
Professor Robert George puts it this way:
"Both Singer and I see very clearly that abortion and infanticide are the same thing. They're both the killing of a human being in the early stage of that human being's development. We both see that if abortion is justified, then infanticide is justified. And we both see that if infanticide is unjustified, then abortion is unjustified."
Professor George differs from Singer insofar as the ultimate conclusion drawn from the obvious and undeniable infanticide-abortion link. Professor George recognizes that the killing of innocent human life is wrong, and that society has every right to protect its more defenseless members. Professor George doesn't buy the pro-eugenics, pro-abortion, pro-infanticide argument. No one with a heart could. If there is one thing that is most fundamentally intrinsic to our better human nature, it is to protect our sons and daughters from conception forward. That natural need to protect is sublimated only at fatal cost.
If the nature of humankind is basically good, there must be more people in the pro-life camp than in the pro-abortion camp. For the two camps are well defined: the pro-abortion camp cherishes destruction, and the pro-life camp cherishes creation. In all of history, the major ideological wars have always come down to those two poles. Pick a side.
Here's a primer: Babies are good. Life is good. Babies are utterly innocent, and only want to be protected and cared for. Every single prenatal baby, bar none, is 100% pro-life. Enthusiastically so, clinging to life...
Life begins at conception. In the testimony of Dr. Jerome Lejeune, Nobel Prize winner in genetics, "Each of us has a unique beginning, the moment of conception. The human nature of the human being from conception to old age is not a metaphysical contention. It is plain experimental evidence. Life has a very, very long history, but each individual has a very neat beginning: the moment of conception."
Just look into a little baby's eyes and ask yourself if the baby's life was worth less, prenatally, than your own.
You have a right to life. The baby does too, from the moment they were conceived.
Pro-Life is Pro-Baby. It is the understanding that babies have rights, rights worth protecting.
Every baby has a right to grow old enough to...
...gurgle, and smile, and laugh, and do all the silly, adorable things that babies do...
...take those first, halting steps as toddlers do, more waddling than walking, offering heart-melting toothless grins in celebration of their own efforts...
...see a bird, or a tree, or a cloud for the first time, and in wide-eyed wonder, point chubby fingers at each new wonder of Creation, as they discover them...
...know the joy of being protected from all the dangers of the outside world, by someone who loves them more than anything in the world. Those rights are what the pro-life movement is all about. Protecting those rights is the core of what being human means.
Innocent little prenatal babies will be saved when Roe falls.
Did you ever notice that only people in favor of abortion get abortions?
Did you ever notice that in the last 30 years we have had lots of abortions?
Did you notice that recent surveys show that young people under 30 are more pro life than people over 30? Two surveys show that people under 30 are much more anti Abortion than their parents. So fetuses that would grow to be pro abortion adults are aborted. Fetuses that will grow up to be pro life are born and raised.
If consrvative and liberal females have the same fertility rate then more conservatives are going to be born and raised. Remember only liberal pregnancies get aborted.
The proper response to a command that requires the commission of crimes is NOT to commit the crimes while waiting for the command to be rescinded. Yet that is what every "pro-life" President and Governor in the Union has been doing for 30 years.
Roe is a command, specifically addressed to the State governments, to refuse the equal protection of the laws to preborn people. In other words, Roe commands all officers of the State governments to engage in criminal acts.
Since it is the universally-agreed position of all members of Western Civilization that commands to commit criminal acts MUST be disobeyed (cf. Nuremberg Tribunal), why has no President, and no Governor in any of the 50 states, in 30 years, invoked that universally-accepted principle, and refused to commit the crimes that Roe commands the Executive and the Governors to commit?
The answer is: sheer unimaginative cowardice. The answer cannot be "principle," because the behavior of every post-Roe President and Governor flies in the face of the principles enunciated (and enforced) at Nuremberg. Every single one of them has obeyed the commands contained in Roe.
1) While Sanger favored the murder of the unborn because of inherently racist attitudes (something else shared by Hitler), abortions are performed today solely for profit.
2) The Holocaust claimed 10 million lives. However, since 1973, with an average of 1.5 million unborn children being butchered every year in the name of convenience, we have our own Holocaust that makes Hitler's pale by comparison.
45 million children dead. Murdered in the womb.
To get an idea exactly how many people that is, take a look at these New England states: Pennsylvania. Rhode Island. Delaware. New Jersey. Massachusetts. Connecticut. Maine. New Hampshire.
Picture these people going through their everyday lives -- working, eating, talking, going to school, driving cars, etc.
Now, picture the streets and homes and schools and office buildings and stores empty. Utterly void of anything human. Nothing but silence going through eight states.
Not very pleasant to think about, is it?
Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, that His justice cannot sleep forever." Thomas Jefferson.
The Liberals/Libertarians better wake up soon and realize that God's Justice WILL NOT Sleep forever.
The legacy of Roe vs. Wade.
True, but if the Republicans were to try a direct frontal assault on Roe, they'd be out of office in the next election and anything they accomplished before then would be undone within the next two years.
On the other hand, if Republicans were to play things right, they could significantly advance the pro-life cause, given that a supermajority of the population would favor restrictions on abortions beyond what Roe v. Wade and subsequent decisions would allow.
Because either those those individuals would eventually have to knuckle under to the federal government's demands or else the result would be civil war. Perhaps civil war is inevitable in this country, but if reforms can be accomplished by other means that would be preferable.
Bump...
Did you notice that recent surveys show that young people under 30 are more pro life than people over 30? Two surveys show that people under 30 are much more anti Abortion than their parents. So fetuses that would grow to be pro abortion adults are aborted. Fetuses that will grow up to be pro life are born and raised.
If conservative and liberal females have the same fertility rate then more conservatives are going to be born and raised. Remember only liberal pregnancies get aborted.
Since the election, I have been pointing out the DemonicRats are the party of death to their own voting blocs.
They advocate abortion, push and glorify the gay life style, glamorize drug useage and have allowed the NEA to turn their children into under educated sheeple and fresh meat for the homosexual predators. All of these crown jewels of the Rats are like old Man Darwin thining their herd.
This is why they had to open up the doors to illegal aliens and throw benefits at them to make them voters. This will back fire on them as many illegals become citizens, get good jobs and buy a home. As Poohbah has pointed out that property taxes and crabgrass makes more conservatives that the conservatives do.
We will see the Party of Death turn into the Donner Party #2 as tax $'s become scarce next year in many states.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.