Skip to comments.
Reuters Furious Over Doctored Jackson Pic (Not Ours)
The Guardian ^
| Saturday November 23, 2002
| Matt Wells
Posted on 11/23/2002 8:03:54 AM PST by ConservativeMan55
Reuters, the news and pictures agency, yesterday demanded an explanation from the Daily Mail as to why it doctored pictures of Michael Jackson. The Mail merged two Reuters pictures of Jackson taking his children for a walk in a Berlin zoo with veils over their faces. The paper also airbrushed out Jackson's security personnel, making the singer appear a more lonely figure. It superimposed the headline "Is he fit to be a dad?".
(Excerpt) Read more at guardian.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Editorial; Extended News; Free Republic; Government; Israel; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: dangling; daschle; doctored; fake; jackson; micheal; pic; picture; rush; tom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
I apologize if this has already been posted, but I couldn't find it when I did a search.
To: ConservativeMan55
The only image I found on the Daily Mail website:
To: Cultural Jihad
There is no hope for these children.
3
posted on
11/23/2002 8:15:48 AM PST
by
Bahbah
To: Cultural Jihad
Words fail me...
To: null and void
Someone said that he put those burkas over his sons so that they wouldn't have to breathe the dirty air?
To: null and void
I every day I feel more guilty for buying that "Thriller" LP back in the '80s.
To: Cultural Jihad
Creepy.... So very, very creepy.
To: ConservativeMan55
Jackson redefines the word, "Freak."
8
posted on
11/23/2002 8:31:16 AM PST
by
TSgt
To: ConservativeMan55
Two thoughts:
1. To borrow from Rick James---"She's a super freak, a super freak, she's super freaky---"
2. And I thought Keith Richards and Mick Jagger were the two worst looking white guys around.
Comment #10 Removed by Moderator
To: Flatch
These kids are going to be, scratch that, ALREADY ARE, MESSED UP!!!!!
To: Cultural Jihad
Why is he so weird? I just don't get it.
12
posted on
11/23/2002 8:38:30 AM PST
by
krb
To: ConservativeMan55
I read that Germany won't take any action about the balcony incident. I wonder what constitutes child abuse in Germany?
13
posted on
11/23/2002 8:40:02 AM PST
by
Dante3
To: Cultural Jihad
that isn't the photo they ran on the front page.
It was only the three Jacksons, everyone else was edited out.
To: Mid-MI Student
That's what I suspected, as the image I found does show others in it.
To: ConservativeMan55
What is the deal with the surgical masks and the kiddie burquas? I've not kept up with the stories on this sicko.
16
posted on
11/23/2002 8:45:50 AM PST
by
gitmo
To: Flatch
I wonder if he's having surgery done on them to make them look him? (His own little mini-me's)
It wouldn't surprise me. He named all three of his sons Prince Michael.
To: gitmo
He claims it's to protect them from kidnappers. I think being kidnapped would probably be the best thing for those kids.
To: ConservativeMan55
The news service that puts "terrorism" in quotes when referring to mass murderers is worried about papers distorting the truth?
To: Welsh Rabbit
He named all three of his sons Prince Michael.He has three sons?
I thought he only had the one until he brought out the nine month old and dangled him over the balcony.
20
posted on
11/23/2002 8:56:26 AM PST
by
Spunky
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson