Posted on 11/13/2002 2:02:19 PM PST by Rodney King
By SAM HAYES
MELOS, Greece The missing arms of the Venus de Milo were discovered last week in a cellar in Southern Croatia and it turns out shes got hideous man-hands!
We rushed the arms to the Louvre in Paris and matched them up to the statue. They were a perfect fit, says art historian Ovidio Bartoli.
Then we did some carbon-dating and we confirmed that these are the real deal.
Word of the discovery has created an uproar in the art world.
Its hard to believe someone so talented in anatomy would have such trouble keeping the fingers in proportion, notes Campbell Hauser, the archaeologist who discovered the statues freakish limbs. Instead of looking like the hands of a goddess, they look like those of a plumber!
Art critics and historians are up in arms over this shocking find. Debate rages over whether or not the missing limbs should be restored. Leading the argument against restoration is art historian Ovidio Bartoli of the Ludvian Museum of National Art.
The misshapen appendages are an abomination, declares Bartoli. Im certain the artist removed the arms himself after he saw how they came out. He knew he would have a beautiful sculpture, if not for those awful ham- hands.
On the other side of the debate is art critic Guisseppi Vesper, who says, These arms are a historical find, one that should be fully restored.
Bartoli disagrees. Restoring this work of art to its original form would be a travesty. It would be like filling in the crack in the Liberty Bell.
No one knows who sculpted the Venus de Milo, or exactly when it was carved. It was found by a peasant on an Aegean island in a basement.
Over the years, art advisors have proposed adding arms holding apples, lamps and clothes and even arms that pointed in different directions.
But Frances King Louis VIII decided that the Venus de Milo was perfect just the way she was.
An executive board at the Louvre will decide their fate next week.
Vesper calls it an insult to the memory of the artist to not reattach the arms to the statue. I am confident this is what he wouldve wanted, the art critic says.
He adds, When it comes time to fight this battle in court, I will have a team of lawyers by my side. I will not face this challenge un-armed . . . and neither should the Venus de Milo.
Arms smugglers.
Yet again further evidence if our efforts to keep our school well stocked with brilliance, (assuming it's passed down)..
Pookie & ME ('86)
Now. Get your scuba gear over to Samothrace and find the rest of the Victory.
When I saw the line about "HAM HANDS" I wondered if Janet "The Wookie" Reno was the model, but I'm not sure she's that old. Close, maybe.
Me too! One of my favorite stories was about the two headed man. One head got married and then discovered that his brother, the other head, was having an affair with his wife.
This story should be in Breaking Broken News!
Lowenfeld (1957) argues that recognition and encouragement of stylistic diversity can sustain a continuum of art activity. His theory was that by about age 12 the art expression of children falls into two categories - the haptic and the visual. The 'visual' student is an observer for whom careful and ordered representation of the details of what is observed is the criterion of artistic performance. For the 'haptic' student the world is experienced in muscular, sensory and kinaesthetic terms. Art is concerned with feeling and sensation rather than outward appearance.
Since the teaching of art is usually in visual terms with accurate observation of form a prime criterion of success, Lowenfeld claimed that the haptic student is penalised. He advocated the provision of a range of stimulation which might motivate all within the haptic-visual continuum and exposure of students to a range of art works, from the emotional and expressionist (the haptic mode) to the more customary representational and realistic. Thus, Lowenfeld and his followers maintain that if inherent stylistic tendencies in students are acknowledged and attended to, art education can continue uninterrupted.
Lowenfeld's blind haptic sculptors nearly always made the hands over-sized.
Art critics and historians are up in arms over this shocking find.
Very clever!
Nah, just turns out she looked married.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.