Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Re-taking the Senate: Hugh Hewitt has a plan for Republican victory in 2002
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Tuesday, January 1, 2002 | Hugh Hewitt

Posted on 01/01/2002 4:23:19 AM PST by JohnHuang2

Happy New Year!

This may not be the first column you read in 2002, but it is almost certainly the first chain letter you will read. That's right: This is a chain letter dressed up like a column. And very bad things will happen to you if you do not immediately forward it to 10 of your friends. In fact, very bad things will happen to the country if you do not immediately forward it to 10 of your friends.

You see, this is a column/chain letter devoted to helping put the U.S. Senate back into the control of the responsible, grown-up party – the Republicans. A strange combination of unusual factors including outright corruption in St. Louis, the shocking bad faith of the television networks on election afternoon and evening, and the unparalleled bad faith of Jumpin' Jim Jeffords delivered the Senate into the control of Tom Daschle and a carnival-like collection of oddballs – including Excitable Pat Leahy of Vermont, Slow Joe Biden of Delaware, Barbara Boxer, Hillary Clinton, Paul Wellstone, etc. This crowd of marginal extremists makes Ted Kennedy look mainstream, yet they are running the upper chamber of Congress during a time of war. This must change in November of 2002, and that is going to take campaign contributions to those individuals best positioned to knock off incumbent Senate Democrats.

That's why you need to forward this column/chain letter to 10 of your friends and they to 10 of their friends. The GOP's candidates do not have organized labor dunning every union member for coerced contributions on payday. The GOP's candidates need checks of $10, $25 and $50 from individuals genuinely concerned with the chaos in the Senate. Leahy has shut down the judicial-confirmation process. Biden is on the warpath to end missile-defense development. Tom Daschle killed economic-stimulus legislation in its cradle in the hopes of prolonging a recession for the political gains he thinks such a slowdown will bring. The list goes on and on. The extreme partisanship displayed by Daschle's gang would be repellent in any year, but it is alarming during wartime.

So forward this column and then get out your checkbooks and make and fulfill a New Year's resolution to get the Congress back in responsible hands. Here's where you send your checks. Make sure you give what you can.

Send a check to John Thune for Senate. Thune is the congressman from South Dakota, and he's running at the specific request of the president. He is South Dakota's only congressman, so it is a very even race even though the incumbent, liberal Democrat Tim Johnson is a close friend of Tom Daschle, and Daschle is raising bucks for Johnson on a daily basis. The address is John Thune for Senate, P.O. Box 516, Sioux Falls, SD 57101.

Send a check to Congress' Greg Ganske who represents Des Moines, Iowa. He's running against a warhorse of the left, Tom Harkin. Ganske's a surgeon and a moderate Republican who can win in a statewide race. Make the check out to Ganske for Senate and send it to 1200 Grand Avenue, West Des Moines, IA 50265, or contribute online.

Next send a check to Coleman for Senate. Norm Coleman recently retired as Mayor of St. Paul, and he's running against hyper-lefty Paul Wellstone. Wellstone promised twice to only seek two terms in the Senate. He lied. Coleman has a great shot at knocking off the senator with the most liberal voting record. Mail the check to 1410 Energy Park Drive #11, Energy Park Plaza, Saint Paul, MN 55108 or contribute online.

Then contribute to Talent for Senate. Former Congressman James Talent should have been governor of Missouri, but the election-night games in St. Louis cost him the governor's chair even as they cost John Ashcroft his Senate seat. Now Talent is running against Jean Carnahan, who is by all accounts an extraordinarily weak candidate. The check should be made out to Talent for Senate and sent to 1031 Executive Parkway, Suite 100, St. Louis, MO 63141.

In Georgia, Congressman Saxby Chambliss is running against incumbent Max Cleland. Cleland is far to the left of the average Georgia voter and Chambliss could win if he gets enough support. That check should be made out to Chambliss for Senate and sent to P.O. Box 4084, Macon, GA 31208.

The incumbent from Louisiana, Mary Landrieu, is another very liberal Democrat from a state that voted heavily for Bush. Congressman John Cooksey should be able to win this race. Send a check made out to Cooksey for Senate to P.O. Box 15020 Monroe, LA 71207.

There is no consensus opponent yet in Montana or New Jersey where Max Baucus and Robert Toricelli round out the field of vulnerable liberals who are running scared. Help the eventual nominees with an online contribution to the National Republican Senatorial Committee, the organization with the single aim of reclaiming the U.S. Senate for the responsible party.

I hate to be the one to send you a chain letter, but this chain letter is in the national interest. The president deserves the support of a Senate that can rise above petty politics and do the nation's business. Tom Daschle failed in his chance to do just that, preferring partisan posturing to bipartisan progress. He doesn't deserve a second chance.

Politics is an expensive business, especially for candidates trying to knock off incumbents. So do your part by writing some checks and by forwarding this on to your friends.

You don't have to stop at 10, by the way. The more people that read and respond, the greater the chances of getting the Senate back on course in November of 2002.


Related offers:

In 'The Embarrassed Believer', Hugh Hewitt is reviving Christian witness in an age of unbelief and is available in WND's online store.



TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: braad; hughhewitt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 321-322 next last
To: Freedom'sWorthIt
Re your post #57...

Amen!---and very well said!!

61 posted on 01/01/2002 9:39:29 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
ANY better than the Democrats? GATT, NAFTA, USA PATRIOTS Act were all passed with the assistance of Republicans

And opposed by the left.

62 posted on 01/01/2002 9:40:23 AM PST by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
My check from Ct is in the mail. I'm adopting Thune.

Praise the Lord, and pass the ammunition!!

;-)

63 posted on 01/01/2002 9:40:55 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt
This is probably the most important thread going - and should be bumped and freeped from now til the Senate has been retaken from the anti-American Demoncreeps!

I totally agree.

64 posted on 01/01/2002 9:42:35 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Valin
My reading is a pro choice position not an attempt to slowly roll back cureent policy. The disparate factions of the LP have a hard time reconciling their positions. Some are adamantly pro life while others place liberty above life and just as adamantly believe it is the womans right. So Harry and friends sat on the fence and got hemmorhoids from the pickets.

But full disclosure compels me to admit I am not an admirer of Harry and his faction.

65 posted on 01/01/2002 9:45:14 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt
In any event, though I have very little stomach for the fight right now - how can I or any of us back away from the battle? The other side won't stop until they have destroyed us. All I can do is stand, fight with financial gifts - what they can be - with prayer - and with action right here on a local level and nationally allied with others of like mind. Then leave the rest to God.

That's all I can do. But that is what I will do - by God's grace and strength, so help me God!

Wow, my friend, that is sooooo well put...it's music to my ears!

66 posted on 01/01/2002 9:45:49 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
This is what I have always liked about Hugh: he talks in specifics, not generalities. Getting on the radio every day and yelling that the Democrats stink is one thing. Giving us directions for how we can affect change is another.

Landrieu has got to go. Does anyone know how Cooksey is doing in his campaign? Are people up or down on him for the "If you have a diaper on your head, and a fanbelt tied around the diaper, you're going to get profiled," comment?

67 posted on 01/01/2002 9:47:03 AM PST by Cinnamon Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skybird
Agree. Forbes should run.

Maybe he's just another Alan Keyes... only wanting to be President and nothing else. Even Hillary knew she had to be something first.

68 posted on 01/01/2002 9:48:22 AM PST by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
That's fine but having primaries to the point where any successful Republican candidate is injured is pointless.
69 posted on 01/01/2002 9:49:42 AM PST by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
That is the only path to restoring our free republic open to us, whether you or I like it or not.

I have seen how Bob Barr and Ron Paul are ignored by the current Republicans. I have not determined which third party is the best but I do know that the Republicans and the Democrats have too many similar traits regarding the removal of individual freedoms and the acceptance of our membership in the UN for me to continue support for the Republican Party.

70 posted on 01/01/2002 9:50:15 AM PST by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
The Club for Growth is the ONLY REPUBLICAN group to support....here's their mission: I see them as the only true Republicans - you can find them at www.clubforgrowth.org

The Club for Growth Mission Statement

The mission of the Club for Growth is to help support political candidates who are advocates of the Reagan vision of limited government and lower taxes. The Club is primarily dedicated to helping elect pro-growth, pro-freedom candidates through political contributions and issue advocacy campaigns. Among the major economic growth issues the Club will emphasize are fundamental income tax reduction and simplification; school choice for all families; and personal investment of Social Security.

The Club for Growth is a membership organization of thousands of likeminded political contributors from across the country who are frustrated with the ideological drift of both parties today. All Club members have a shared goal of helping elect more Reaganite, economic growth-oriented office seekers. During each election cycle, the Club will provide members with a list of candidates for Congress (10 to 20 at first) who both deserve and need financial support. We will rely on two criteria in selecting candidates for the list: 1) They are committed to the right set of free market-based policy ideas; and 2) They are running races that are closely contested and thus winnable. In many cases, we will support primary challengers taking on entrenched incumbents.

The goal of the Club for Growth is to help our members identify races where their campaign contributions, leveraged with those of thousands of other Club members, can truly make the difference in impacting elections, and thus influencing public policy.

71 posted on 01/01/2002 9:51:04 AM PST by goodnesswins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: marajade
I have no interest in turning this into a discussion of Keyes...but your comment is unfair. Alan ran for the Senate twice in the very liberal State of Maryland.

I agree with you that it is in the best interests of the country for Forbes to step up to the plate...he has the resources to win.

72 posted on 01/01/2002 9:51:39 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
EV works for Alan Keyes.
73 posted on 01/01/2002 9:52:05 AM PST by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
we just have to learn to match the RINOs dollar for dollar; and then use our grassroots strength to roll them over

Bump!

74 posted on 01/01/2002 9:54:00 AM PST by SusanUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
Well, I guess you had your mind made up before you asked the question then.

It's a free country...do what you want. But I will do everything in my power to increase Conservative strength where I think it can actually accomplish some positive good...in the GOP.

75 posted on 01/01/2002 9:54:15 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
I would like my questions in #31 answered.
76 posted on 01/01/2002 9:55:13 AM PST by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Just because he ran doesn't mean a thing. Hillary was elected as a Senator before she'll run for President, big big difference.

Forbes can run and win.

77 posted on 01/01/2002 9:55:27 AM PST by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
I like Forbes. I don't think he has the charisma to win an election, but like Alan Keyes, here we have a guy who WON'T RUN FOR ANY OFFICE HE HAS A CHANCE OF WINNING!

I get a little fed up with these people who think that only the presidency is "worthy" of their efforts. If Forbes couldn't win a Senate seat, they go for a House seat---this is called "riding the bench" while you learn the game. If Keyes had spent 10 years getting a House seat, then having a legitimate shot at the Senate, he might have done something. C'mon, Steve, find a race you can be competitive in and make a difference.

78 posted on 01/01/2002 9:55:51 AM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: marajade
EV works for Alan Keyes.

Liar.

Why are you disrupting this thread??

79 posted on 01/01/2002 9:56:30 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Excuse me... Worked.
80 posted on 01/01/2002 9:58:10 AM PST by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 321-322 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson