Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Re-taking the Senate: Hugh Hewitt has a plan for Republican victory in 2002
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Tuesday, January 1, 2002 | Hugh Hewitt

Posted on 01/01/2002 4:23:19 AM PST by JohnHuang2

Happy New Year!

This may not be the first column you read in 2002, but it is almost certainly the first chain letter you will read. That's right: This is a chain letter dressed up like a column. And very bad things will happen to you if you do not immediately forward it to 10 of your friends. In fact, very bad things will happen to the country if you do not immediately forward it to 10 of your friends.

You see, this is a column/chain letter devoted to helping put the U.S. Senate back into the control of the responsible, grown-up party – the Republicans. A strange combination of unusual factors including outright corruption in St. Louis, the shocking bad faith of the television networks on election afternoon and evening, and the unparalleled bad faith of Jumpin' Jim Jeffords delivered the Senate into the control of Tom Daschle and a carnival-like collection of oddballs – including Excitable Pat Leahy of Vermont, Slow Joe Biden of Delaware, Barbara Boxer, Hillary Clinton, Paul Wellstone, etc. This crowd of marginal extremists makes Ted Kennedy look mainstream, yet they are running the upper chamber of Congress during a time of war. This must change in November of 2002, and that is going to take campaign contributions to those individuals best positioned to knock off incumbent Senate Democrats.

That's why you need to forward this column/chain letter to 10 of your friends and they to 10 of their friends. The GOP's candidates do not have organized labor dunning every union member for coerced contributions on payday. The GOP's candidates need checks of $10, $25 and $50 from individuals genuinely concerned with the chaos in the Senate. Leahy has shut down the judicial-confirmation process. Biden is on the warpath to end missile-defense development. Tom Daschle killed economic-stimulus legislation in its cradle in the hopes of prolonging a recession for the political gains he thinks such a slowdown will bring. The list goes on and on. The extreme partisanship displayed by Daschle's gang would be repellent in any year, but it is alarming during wartime.

So forward this column and then get out your checkbooks and make and fulfill a New Year's resolution to get the Congress back in responsible hands. Here's where you send your checks. Make sure you give what you can.

Send a check to John Thune for Senate. Thune is the congressman from South Dakota, and he's running at the specific request of the president. He is South Dakota's only congressman, so it is a very even race even though the incumbent, liberal Democrat Tim Johnson is a close friend of Tom Daschle, and Daschle is raising bucks for Johnson on a daily basis. The address is John Thune for Senate, P.O. Box 516, Sioux Falls, SD 57101.

Send a check to Congress' Greg Ganske who represents Des Moines, Iowa. He's running against a warhorse of the left, Tom Harkin. Ganske's a surgeon and a moderate Republican who can win in a statewide race. Make the check out to Ganske for Senate and send it to 1200 Grand Avenue, West Des Moines, IA 50265, or contribute online.

Next send a check to Coleman for Senate. Norm Coleman recently retired as Mayor of St. Paul, and he's running against hyper-lefty Paul Wellstone. Wellstone promised twice to only seek two terms in the Senate. He lied. Coleman has a great shot at knocking off the senator with the most liberal voting record. Mail the check to 1410 Energy Park Drive #11, Energy Park Plaza, Saint Paul, MN 55108 or contribute online.

Then contribute to Talent for Senate. Former Congressman James Talent should have been governor of Missouri, but the election-night games in St. Louis cost him the governor's chair even as they cost John Ashcroft his Senate seat. Now Talent is running against Jean Carnahan, who is by all accounts an extraordinarily weak candidate. The check should be made out to Talent for Senate and sent to 1031 Executive Parkway, Suite 100, St. Louis, MO 63141.

In Georgia, Congressman Saxby Chambliss is running against incumbent Max Cleland. Cleland is far to the left of the average Georgia voter and Chambliss could win if he gets enough support. That check should be made out to Chambliss for Senate and sent to P.O. Box 4084, Macon, GA 31208.

The incumbent from Louisiana, Mary Landrieu, is another very liberal Democrat from a state that voted heavily for Bush. Congressman John Cooksey should be able to win this race. Send a check made out to Cooksey for Senate to P.O. Box 15020 Monroe, LA 71207.

There is no consensus opponent yet in Montana or New Jersey where Max Baucus and Robert Toricelli round out the field of vulnerable liberals who are running scared. Help the eventual nominees with an online contribution to the National Republican Senatorial Committee, the organization with the single aim of reclaiming the U.S. Senate for the responsible party.

I hate to be the one to send you a chain letter, but this chain letter is in the national interest. The president deserves the support of a Senate that can rise above petty politics and do the nation's business. Tom Daschle failed in his chance to do just that, preferring partisan posturing to bipartisan progress. He doesn't deserve a second chance.

Politics is an expensive business, especially for candidates trying to knock off incumbents. So do your part by writing some checks and by forwarding this on to your friends.

You don't have to stop at 10, by the way. The more people that read and respond, the greater the chances of getting the Senate back on course in November of 2002.


Related offers:

In 'The Embarrassed Believer', Hugh Hewitt is reviving Christian witness in an age of unbelief and is available in WND's online store.



TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: braad; hughhewitt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-322 next last
To: Reagan Man
As an aside, we should mention that it is imperitive for Republicans and conservatives to get in position to be poll watchers.

The Dems are capable of just about anything, as any sentient human being had vividly demonstrated to them in 2000.

Our side having eyeballs where the votes are counted is expecially critical in the urban areas. As I have pointed out a hundred times here, it is NOT a coincidence that the RATS won wherever they had complete control over the electoral process.

90%+ turnout in the black community, my *ss!! Hah!!

41 posted on 01/01/2002 9:06:55 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
You need to see this. Abortion diagram chart
42 posted on 01/01/2002 9:10:07 AM PST by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
The republican party is pro life, the democrats are pro abortion and the libertarians are pro choice.

Just a few interjections here... blanket generalizations like this are usually rather inaccurate.

However, if you are referring to the general leanings of the party platforms and leadership, you're getting closer... but libertarians are NOT pro-choice. Libertarianism is mostly about getting the FedGov monster back in its cage and out of those area of our lives that they have no Constitutional authority to legislate. I believe the party position leans towards taking the abortion issue out of the Federal Courts, and returning it to the states, in accordance with the Constitution. Then the will of the voters of each state will decide the issue. If THIS is what you mean by 'pro-choice', then I'll stand corrected... but that's not the usual usage of the term.

Finally, a total focus on abortion is a really poor way to choose a party, candidate, or referendum. Clinton's 3 vetoes of partial-birth procedures shows just how easy it is for the Lefties to make all those efforts come to naught... and then we're stuck with some really crummy (albeit pro-life) RINO's who stand against FReedom on most other issues. It is wiser to find a candidate who leans towards Liberty on MOST issues, not just one.

43 posted on 01/01/2002 9:14:18 AM PST by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
Thanks for the link. And keep voting republican, it is the best chance to roll this crap back.
44 posted on 01/01/2002 9:15:59 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

bump
45 posted on 01/01/2002 9:16:45 AM PST by IM2Phat4U
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
I requested you to answer my specific questions, not make a political round statement about the past six years. Specific details were asked for.

Are you running for Office?

46 posted on 01/01/2002 9:18:07 AM PST by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Perhaps you would care to answer my specific questions in #31 explaining to me why Republicans are better and not of the same color as Democrats.
47 posted on 01/01/2002 9:21:46 AM PST by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: rface
Is anything being done to ensure a fairer election in MO?
48 posted on 01/01/2002 9:22:46 AM PST by Straight Vermonter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
I agree, I hate it when someone out of state trys to pick the candidate. It's very unrepublican. The republican party makes its decisions from the grassroots up. (It's why we are so conservative.) The democrats like to have their leaders decide for them. (that's why they're liberals.)
49 posted on 01/01/2002 9:26:36 AM PST by Sci Fi Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
In answer to your last question first...NO!!

As to specifically answering your question, I thought I did.

The answer is for Conservatives to continue the fight to control the Republican Party apparatus...and to elect more and more likeminded folks every election cycle.

That is the only path to restoring our free republic open to us, whether you or I like it or not.

50 posted on 01/01/2002 9:30:25 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
Just a few interjections here... blanket generalizations like this are usually rather inaccurate.

No innacuracy at all, a reading of each party's platform will confirm my opinion, not yours.

However, if you are referring to the general leanings of the party platforms and leadership, you're getting closer... but libertarians are NOT pro-choice.

Loolk, the LP platform IS pro choice. They want the choice of whether or not to kill babies left up to the voters of each state. Thats a pro choice position. If the LP truly believed that the right to life was an unalienable right, there platform would not require states to choose whether or not it was a right.

Libertarianism is mostly about getting the FedGov monster back in its cage and out of those area of our lives that they have no Constitutional authority to legislate. I believe the party position leans towards taking the abortion issue out of the Federal Courts, and returning it to the states, in accordance with the Constitution. Then the will of the voters of each state will decide the issue. If THIS is what you mean by 'pro-choice', then I'll stand corrected... but that's not the usual usage of the term.

Thats exactly what I mean by a pro choice position. Either the right to life is an unalienable right or its not. Read the fifth amendment again and then tell me that abortion is not a constitutional or Federal issue.

I understand that there is continuum of views about abortion which is why I seperated the LP and the DP but presently there is only one pro life party of those three I mentioned.

Finally, a total focus on abortion is a really poor way to choose a party, candidate, or referendum. Clinton's 3 vetoes of partial-birth procedures shows just how easy it is for the Lefties to make all those efforts come to naught... and then we're stuck with some really crummy (albeit pro-life) RINO's who stand against FReedom on most other issues. It is wiser to find a candidate who leans towards Liberty on MOST issues, not just one.

Pretty big leap here, eh? I gave one example and IMHO the biggest reason to vote R rather than the other two. You can't enjoy liberty or pursue happiness on this earth without life.

51 posted on 01/01/2002 9:30:32 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Re #38. BTTT
52 posted on 01/01/2002 9:30:57 AM PST by VRWC For Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Coleman for Senate. Norm Coleman recently retired as Mayor of St. Paul, and he's running against hyper-lefty Paul Wellstone.

The question I have about Norm is, does he have the fire in the belly for this race? If his campaign fo governor is any indication I'd have to say no. He took a page from Bob Doles campaign and ran an "Hi I'm Norm Coleman and it's my turn, besides I'm a nice guy" campaign. I must admit to a certain negative reaction to "anointed" candidates.

ps hey hey ho ho Paul Wellstone has got to go!

53 posted on 01/01/2002 9:32:20 AM PST by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Bump up for bux.

Victories in all these races would be great. For this South Dakotan defeating Tim Johnson in spite of Tom Daschle (pronounced - Tom D'Asch Hole - say it fast) would be a shot across the bow that would really be worth savoring.

So a bump for John Thune especially.
John Thune for Senate
P.O. Box 516
Sioux Falls, SD 57101

54 posted on 01/01/2002 9:33:02 AM PST by ImpBill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
Maybe you're looking for me to say, 'there is a huge difference between the Dems and the Republicans'...

Ok...

There is a huge difference between the Dems and the Republicans.

Is the GOP perfect?---far from it. But it is lightyears better than the Party of Hillary.

55 posted on 01/01/2002 9:34:27 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
What make the Republicans, whom I have contributed for decades, ANY better than the Democrats?

This is the question you asked, I answered it. Here's another answer. Republicans cut taxes, democrats raise them. Republicans support the RTKBA, democrats oppose. Republicans kill terrorists, democrats pardon them.

Want more?

56 posted on 01/01/2002 9:34:52 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance; jwalsh07
This is probably the most important thread going - and should be bumped and freeped from now til the Senate has been retaken from the anti-American Demoncreeps!

Yes, individual candidates are the way to go.

The left has the Union money, Hollywood's money, and trial lawyers money. It also has many of the nonprofits and corporate "giants" cornered and bribed. And of course in its corner is the extortion kings NAACP and Jesse Jackson branch of American terrorists.

But, hopefully, Sept 11th has opened some eyes in all these constituencies. And where it hasn't, we must do our part.

I can't give a lot but I can give some. Like the Vietnamese lady who sold her house to thank America - would that she had given some of that money to candidates who can restore America to a nation NOT heading pellmell after the Communist model but going back to its roots in freedom....(don't plan on doing that in 2001 - but who knows what other sacrifices might be made???) - many will need to make sacrificial donations and efforts to overcome the vote fraud that may do us in = again!

This may be the last chance.

If the Demoncreeps increase in the Senate and take the house - I think it will be bye bye to our country.

But, I have been wrong before.

In any event, though I have very little stomach for the fight right now - how can I or any of us back away from the battle? The other side won't stop until they have destroyed us. All I can do is stand, fight with financial gifts - what they can be - with prayer - and with action right here on a local level and nationally allied with others of like mind. Then leave the rest to God.

That's all I can do. But that is what I will do - by God's grace and strength, so help me God!

57 posted on 01/01/2002 9:35:12 AM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ImpBill
My check from Ct is in the mail. I'm adopting Thune.
58 posted on 01/01/2002 9:36:17 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
the pubbies will not be re-taking california higher offices without asians and latinos.

the hatred of immigrants on fr, expressed daily, doesn't help.

therefore, expect california to stay dem.

59 posted on 01/01/2002 9:37:44 AM PST by ken21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
They want the choice of whether or not to kill babies left up to the voters of each state. Thats a pro choice position.

Is it? Or is it trying to do the possible V. the perfect?

No flame intended.

60 posted on 01/01/2002 9:37:50 AM PST by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 321-322 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson