Posted on 01/01/2002 4:23:19 AM PST by JohnHuang2
The Dems are capable of just about anything, as any sentient human being had vividly demonstrated to them in 2000.
Our side having eyeballs where the votes are counted is expecially critical in the urban areas. As I have pointed out a hundred times here, it is NOT a coincidence that the RATS won wherever they had complete control over the electoral process.
90%+ turnout in the black community, my *ss!! Hah!!
Just a few interjections here... blanket generalizations like this are usually rather inaccurate.
However, if you are referring to the general leanings of the party platforms and leadership, you're getting closer... but libertarians are NOT pro-choice. Libertarianism is mostly about getting the FedGov monster back in its cage and out of those area of our lives that they have no Constitutional authority to legislate. I believe the party position leans towards taking the abortion issue out of the Federal Courts, and returning it to the states, in accordance with the Constitution. Then the will of the voters of each state will decide the issue. If THIS is what you mean by 'pro-choice', then I'll stand corrected... but that's not the usual usage of the term.
Finally, a total focus on abortion is a really poor way to choose a party, candidate, or referendum. Clinton's 3 vetoes of partial-birth procedures shows just how easy it is for the Lefties to make all those efforts come to naught... and then we're stuck with some really crummy (albeit pro-life) RINO's who stand against FReedom on most other issues. It is wiser to find a candidate who leans towards Liberty on MOST issues, not just one.
Are you running for Office?
As to specifically answering your question, I thought I did.
The answer is for Conservatives to continue the fight to control the Republican Party apparatus...and to elect more and more likeminded folks every election cycle.
That is the only path to restoring our free republic open to us, whether you or I like it or not.
No innacuracy at all, a reading of each party's platform will confirm my opinion, not yours.
However, if you are referring to the general leanings of the party platforms and leadership, you're getting closer... but libertarians are NOT pro-choice.
Loolk, the LP platform IS pro choice. They want the choice of whether or not to kill babies left up to the voters of each state. Thats a pro choice position. If the LP truly believed that the right to life was an unalienable right, there platform would not require states to choose whether or not it was a right.
Libertarianism is mostly about getting the FedGov monster back in its cage and out of those area of our lives that they have no Constitutional authority to legislate. I believe the party position leans towards taking the abortion issue out of the Federal Courts, and returning it to the states, in accordance with the Constitution. Then the will of the voters of each state will decide the issue. If THIS is what you mean by 'pro-choice', then I'll stand corrected... but that's not the usual usage of the term.
Thats exactly what I mean by a pro choice position. Either the right to life is an unalienable right or its not. Read the fifth amendment again and then tell me that abortion is not a constitutional or Federal issue.
I understand that there is continuum of views about abortion which is why I seperated the LP and the DP but presently there is only one pro life party of those three I mentioned.
Finally, a total focus on abortion is a really poor way to choose a party, candidate, or referendum. Clinton's 3 vetoes of partial-birth procedures shows just how easy it is for the Lefties to make all those efforts come to naught... and then we're stuck with some really crummy (albeit pro-life) RINO's who stand against FReedom on most other issues. It is wiser to find a candidate who leans towards Liberty on MOST issues, not just one.
Pretty big leap here, eh? I gave one example and IMHO the biggest reason to vote R rather than the other two. You can't enjoy liberty or pursue happiness on this earth without life.
The question I have about Norm is, does he have the fire in the belly for this race? If his campaign fo governor is any indication I'd have to say no. He took a page from Bob Doles campaign and ran an "Hi I'm Norm Coleman and it's my turn, besides I'm a nice guy" campaign. I must admit to a certain negative reaction to "anointed" candidates.
ps hey hey ho ho Paul Wellstone has got to go!
Victories in all these races would be great. For this South Dakotan defeating Tim Johnson in spite of Tom Daschle (pronounced - Tom D'Asch Hole - say it fast) would be a shot across the bow that would really be worth savoring.
So a bump for John Thune especially.
John Thune for Senate
P.O. Box 516
Sioux Falls, SD 57101
Ok...
There is a huge difference between the Dems and the Republicans.
Is the GOP perfect?---far from it. But it is lightyears better than the Party of Hillary.
This is the question you asked, I answered it. Here's another answer. Republicans cut taxes, democrats raise them. Republicans support the RTKBA, democrats oppose. Republicans kill terrorists, democrats pardon them.
Want more?
Yes, individual candidates are the way to go.
The left has the Union money, Hollywood's money, and trial lawyers money. It also has many of the nonprofits and corporate "giants" cornered and bribed. And of course in its corner is the extortion kings NAACP and Jesse Jackson branch of American terrorists.
But, hopefully, Sept 11th has opened some eyes in all these constituencies. And where it hasn't, we must do our part.
I can't give a lot but I can give some. Like the Vietnamese lady who sold her house to thank America - would that she had given some of that money to candidates who can restore America to a nation NOT heading pellmell after the Communist model but going back to its roots in freedom....(don't plan on doing that in 2001 - but who knows what other sacrifices might be made???) - many will need to make sacrificial donations and efforts to overcome the vote fraud that may do us in = again!
This may be the last chance.
If the Demoncreeps increase in the Senate and take the house - I think it will be bye bye to our country.
But, I have been wrong before.
In any event, though I have very little stomach for the fight right now - how can I or any of us back away from the battle? The other side won't stop until they have destroyed us. All I can do is stand, fight with financial gifts - what they can be - with prayer - and with action right here on a local level and nationally allied with others of like mind. Then leave the rest to God.
That's all I can do. But that is what I will do - by God's grace and strength, so help me God!
the hatred of immigrants on fr, expressed daily, doesn't help.
therefore, expect california to stay dem.
Is it? Or is it trying to do the possible V. the perfect?
No flame intended.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.