Posted on 02/27/2026 9:25:01 AM PST by Kazan
Last June when the United States targeted Iran’s nuclear facilities in a series of coordinated airstrikes with Israel, President Trump boasted that “Iran’s key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated.” He said that on the day of the operation, which hit the enrichment facility at Fordow, buried under a mountain, as well as sites at Natanz and Isfahan.
In the ensuing days and months, Trump repeated this claim, saying that Iran’s nuclear facilities and capabilities had been “obliterated.” In August he said, “We obliterated … the future nuclear capability of Iran.” In October he said, “Well, they don’t have a nuclear program. It was obliterated.” In December he said, “We obliterated their nuclear capability.” He said the same in January, multiple times, even claiming we had obliterated Iran’s “enrichment capability.” As recently as this month Trump repeated the claim — “totally obliterated” was the phrase he used.
So if that’s true, if we “totally obliterated” Iran’s nuclear capabilities just eight months ago, then why are we about to go to war with Iran? After all, the justification for U.S. strikes on Iran has always been that we cannot allow the regime in Tehran to obtain a nuclear weapon. Most Americans agree with that, and it’s easy to understand why. But we were assured, over and over for months, that Iran’s nuclear program had been totally destroyed.
Now the administration is suddenly saying something different. During his State of the Union speech on Tuesday, President Trump accused Iran of restarting its nuclear program and working to build missiles that would “soon” be able to reach the United States. Really? How is that possible if we utterly destroyed their nuclear program in June of last year?
And if we didn’t actually destroy Iran’s nuclear program, then when is the president going to come out and admit that? The American people aren’t idiots, we can handle the truth. Just tell us that the strikes last June weren’t as effective as we first thought and that’s why we’re now giving the Iranians ultimatums now about how they need to destroy their nuclear facilities and abandon their enrichment programs.
If it was true, if we really did obliterate Iran’s nuclear facilities as thoroughly as Trump says we did, then when is the president or someone from the administration going to come out and explain the justification for going to war with Tehran now, after neutralizing their nuclear threat? Don’t tell us it’s about the nuclear facilities we destroyed. What is the real reason we’re about to go to war?
These questions are important because launching a war of choice against Iran is a big deal that we shouldn’t undertake lightly — and certainly not for murky or shifting reasons. A decent respect for the opinion of the American people should compel any White House to at least give a plausible reason for launching regime change strikes on the other side of the world.
But what we’re getting from Trump is inconsistent. Last month when Iran was killing protesters, Trump threatened military action against Tehran, suggesting that targeting protesters was a red line. But today the issue seems to be Iran’s supposedly obliterated nuclear program, which is inexplicably once again a major threat to American interests. Last week, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt was asked why the U.S. would need to strike Iran if its nuclear program had already been destroyed. She said, “Well, there’s many reasons and arguments that one could make for a strike against Iran.”
That might be so, but it’s incumbent on the administration to pick a reason and make an argument to the American people. You can’t tell us one week that we have to strike Iran because the regime is killing protesters, and the next week tell us that we have to strike Iran because the regime is enriching uranium at sites that are supposed to be destroyed. At a certain point, it begins to look like the Trump administration is fishing for a reason to strike Iran.
Sorry, but that’s not good enough. It’s also not good enough to take Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s word at face value on the question of Iran’s nuclear capabilities. Netanyahu has been warning that Iran is on the brink of a nuclear weapon since 1996. There are videos circulating on social media mashing up 30 years of Netanyahu claiming Iran is about to have a nuclear weapon. Forgive me for being skeptical at this point — especially after Trump made a huge deal of obliterating Tehran’s nuclear infrastructure eight months ago.
Meanwhile, Politico is reporting that some U.S. officials think Israel should attack Iran first and let Iran retaliate against the U.S., saying “the politics are a lot better” that way, and it would “give us more reason to take action,” according to an anonymous administration official.
The whole thing feels like spitballing. And for those of us who are old enough to remember President George W. Bush’s “slam dunk” on WMDs in Iraq, it also feels oddly familiar. Polls might show that Republicans support regime change in Iran (although unwilling to risk any U.S. casualties to achieve it), but what they will not tolerate is being lied to or misled about why we’re going to war.
Given our past experiences being hoodwinked into disastrous Middle East wars, being honest about what’s really behind this push for regime change in Iran is likely the only way for the Trump administration not to turn the American people hard against it.
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
“Trump Said We ‘Obliterated’ Iran’s Nuclear Program Last June. So Why Are We About To Go War?”
Because Iran is rebuilding it.
Because they’re rebuilding? Just spitballin’.
“Because Iran is rebuilding it.”
With the help of certain communist countries.
It is an excellent question. BTW, US Embassy is telling Americans to leave ASAP if they can.
Gott protect putin’s friends in Tehran at all costs ...
The article is making too much out of a generic statement.
First Ballistic Missiles were not a main target, nothing was said nor indicated about destroying those as I recall.
Second such programs are about knowledge also and we did not assassinate all their scientists.
Third we could easily have destroyed the program but not all the resources and given the knowledge they could cobble some kind of nuclear weapon together in short order.
There is no cause to act like somehow Trump is lying about any of this.
I remember being told it would be years before they could rebuild - not 8 months. Almost like we are being pressured into attacking Iran by someone...Or they lied about how much damage was done.
Personally, if I wanted this endless war sh!t I would have voted for Lindsey Graham or Jeb Bush.
What we got here with this IRGC bunch is a failure to communicate. They need “motivation.”
Yeah, the author is an ass. These are two separate claims:
President Trump accused Iran of:
1: restarting its nuclear program
2: working to build missiles that would “soon” be able to reach the United States.
“Really? How is that possible if we utterly destroyed their nuclear program in June of last year?”
OK, #1 is possible because you restart by restarting, regardless of whether the damage was 100%, 99%, 80%,or 50%
#2 Building missiles is totally different program. We bombed their uranium enrichment. Uranium enrichment is not a missile.
Stupid dishonest article. Thanks Tucker.
“Netanyahu has been warning that Iran is on the brink of a nuclear weapon since 1996. There are videos circulating on social media mashing up 30 years of Netanyahu claiming Iran is about to have a nuclear weapon.”
It would take about 25 H-bombs to knock out metro DC because it sprawls for about 50 miles out.
Vaporizing what’s inside the Beltway wouldn’t knock out Quantico, Fort Belvoir, Andrews, or Burke (where many Pentagon military reside).
Israel probably has about 350 bombs. Why so many? Because there are lots of targets.
Ballistic missiles?
Cozying uupp with russia & the PRCs?
Mr. President I bet you know where this is.
The major cities of Iran are primarily concentrated in the north and west, led by the capital, Tehran (~9.7M residents), followed by major cultural and religious hubs Mashhad (~3.5M), Isfahan (~2.3M), Karaj (~1.6M), and Shiraz (~1.76M). These cities serve as key administrative, economic, and historical centers, with others like Tabriz, Qom, and Ahvaz also playing vital roles.
https://nypost.com/2026/02/27/us-news/mike-huckabee-tells-israel-embassy-staff-to-leave-today-if-they-want-to-as-iran-talks-stall/
“I remember being told it would be years before they could rebuild - not 8 months.”
Iran has about 80 milion people, roughly.
The US in 1945 had about 130 million.
The US built two bombs in three years starting from scratch.
Iran has the know-how.
I haven't seen anybody in the administration claim that they have rebuilt the nuclear program to the point it was at before the attack.
If you are going to claim that the administration is lying, you should really supply full quotes and in full context.
The real problem is Iran gaining the ability to make a dirty bomb. You don’t need a nuclear reaction to contaminate an area and render it off limits to habitation.
China Urges Citizens To Leave Iran ‘As Soon As Possible’ Amid Fears Of US Strike On Tehran
Chinese Embassy in Israel advises Chinese nationals to monitor security, avoid unnecessary outings
https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202602/1355860.shtml
UK withdraws Tehran embassy staff as concern grows over threat of US strikes
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c309vz0z893o
U.S. tells embassy staff in Israel to leave now if they want amid Trump threats to attack Iran
France urges citizens to avoid travel to Israel, Jerusalem, West Bank
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.