Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Proposition 50 could disenfranchise Republican California voters. Will it survive a legal challenge?
Los Angeles Times ^ | Nov. 1, 2025 3 AM PT | Jenny Jarvie

Posted on 11/01/2025 2:31:28 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

Six years ago, when the U.S. Supreme Court upheld highly partisan state election maps in North Carolina and Maryland — ruling that federal courts cannot block states from drawing up maps that favor one party over the other — one of the court’s liberal justices issued a warning.

“If left unchecked, gerrymanders like the ones here may irreparably damage our system of government,” Associate Justice Elena Kagan wrote in a dissent.

Kagan argued that Republicans in North Carolina and Democrats in Maryland — the two examples before the court — had rigged elections in a way that “deprived citizens of the most fundamental of their constitutional rights,” “debased and dishonored our democracy” and turned “upside-down the core American idea that all governmental power derives from the people.”

“Ask yourself,” Kagan said as she recounted what had happened in each state: “Is this how American democracy is supposed to work?”

That’s the question Californians are now weighing as they decide how, or whether, to vote on Proposition 50, Gov. Gavin Newsom’s plan to scrap congressional maps drawn by the state’s independent redistricting commission and replace them with maps drawn by legislators to favor Democrats through 2030.

Democrats don’t deny that the measure is a deliberate attempt to dilute GOP voting power.

From the start, they’ve argued that the point of redistricting is to weaken Republicans’ voting power in California — a move they justify on the grounds that it is a temporary fix to offset similar partisan gerrymandering by Texas Republicans. This summer, President Trump upped the ante, pressing Texas to rejigger maps to shore up the GOP’s narrow House majority ahead of the 2026 election.

Experts say opponents of Proposition 50 have no viable federal legal challenge against the new maps on the basis that they disenfranchise a large chunk...

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1partyrule; california; democratcorruption; democratterrorism; eplentyofspam; epluribusrino; highspeedrail; newsomfornia; onepartyrule; sirspamalot; spammingfr

1 posted on 11/01/2025 2:31:28 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

End the filibuster.

Trim back the welfare system.

Cede Ventura, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside (west of Palm Springs) and San Diego Counties of Southern California back to Mexico. Put most Owens Valley and Colorado River water to agricultural use and charge dearly for the rest and use the money to pay on the national debt.

Offer the San Francisco Bay area (except the vineyard region) to the Republic of China. If refused, cede it to Mexico. Charge for Sierra Nevada water to help pay the national debt.

Cede the Democratic southern tip of Texas back to Mexico.


2 posted on 11/01/2025 2:39:04 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Disenfranchised California voters?

They’re flooding Texas. Some cities are doubledeckering entire highway systems

Newsom drove them out

If the democrats get Texas as blue state it’s over.

Well, so if Newsom is focusing on the presidency much more than on his governorship of California, as in taking care of California, then why would he not drive them over to Texas.

He would want to disenfranchise Californians.


3 posted on 11/01/2025 2:45:14 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Little money being spent to kill prop 50, at least on TV. Of course the likes of the Bathhouse Berry and pasty face Tom Steyer are all over the airwaves bashing Trump / Pro Prop 50.

So Trump / Republicans pulled in around 39% of the vote last November in Kalifornia. And to show for it there is zero State wide office Representation in Sacramento. And when this passes there will be probably less than five Republican Reps in DC come next years election. It could be 48 Rats Reps, and 4 Republican. In it’s most simple calculation 39% of Republicans would be 20 State Representatives. in DC That is Democrat / Newscum form of Democracy.


4 posted on 11/01/2025 2:50:20 PM PDT by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It is currently being challenged by Steve Hilton, the judge is laughing it off.


5 posted on 11/01/2025 2:54:58 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; BraveMan; cardinal4; ...

6 posted on 11/01/2025 2:58:19 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (NeverTrumpin' -- it's not just for DNC shills anymore -- oh, wait, yeah it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

““If left unchecked, gerrymanders like the ones here may irreparably damage our system of government,””

Uh, Genius, they already have. For decades.


7 posted on 11/01/2025 3:02:44 PM PDT by Paladin2 (YMMV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

“Cede Ventura, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside (west of Palm Springs) and San Diego Counties of Southern California back to Mexico”

When Hell Freezes over. It was never theirs to begin with.

BTW, should we “return” Florida to the King of Spain?


8 posted on 11/01/2025 3:11:19 PM PDT by Regulator (It's fraud, Jim)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum; All
Thank you for referencing that article E. Pluribus Unum.

Proposition 50 could disenfranchise Republican California voters. Will it survive a legal challenge?


Gerrymandering is a good example of Democrats rigging an election imo, a violation of Section 2 of the 14th Amendment if such is the case imo. That section is a penalty for states where voting integrity has been compromised.

Note the zero tolerance, "hair trigger" wording of that section which federal and state governments, under the boots of the corrupt, constitutionally undefined political parties, are evidently ignoring imo.

Here is third party opinion that both state and federal governments are wrongly ignoring Section 2 imo.

Note Thomas Jefferson's advice against ignoring parts of the Constitution.

"The general rule [is] that an instrument is to be so construed as to reconcile and give meaning and effect to all its parts.

9 posted on 11/01/2025 3:11:47 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian Griffin

We cede nothing. Drive the enemy off our land.


10 posted on 11/01/2025 3:16:43 PM PDT by bankwalker (Feminists, like all Marxists, are ungrateful parasites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
The Wife and I voted NO. However, I won't be surprised if passed. The left put much more pro-50 advertising into it being good policy and anti-Trump.

I find it mind-bobbling that the only thing the Dims/Socialists/Commies have in their purse is just TDS.

11 posted on 11/01/2025 3:25:11 PM PDT by A Navy Vet (USA Birth Certificate - 1789. Death Certificate - 2021? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Regulator
"BTW, should we “return” Florida to the King of Spain?"

And return the Northeast to England? And maybe the LOA purchase to France? The counties in the above article will never CEDE their authority, especially not Orange or Riverside counties.

12 posted on 11/01/2025 3:32:29 PM PDT by A Navy Vet (USA Birth Certificate - 1789. Death Certificate - 2021? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Republican voters have been disenfranchised since 1999 or earlier by the CA DMV allowing non-citizens access to driver's license and "motor voter" registration to vote. There is no way to compete with that. I observed in person the DMV staff coaching a non-English speaker through the license test. That sealed my decision to get out of CA. It took a year to make a decision on a new destination and move. I have retired at that destination in a state where my vote still counts.
13 posted on 11/01/2025 4:19:12 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Yes it should pass the scrutiny of the courts for a number of reasons. It also means red states should be able to do what they want.

CA will be losing 3 to 5 seats, NY will lose 3 seats, RI -1, Illinois -2, OR -1 and those seats will go to TX, FL, ID, TN, NC and GA. Perfect.


14 posted on 11/01/2025 5:31:41 PM PDT by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DAC21
Little money being spent to kill prop 50, at least on TV. Of course the likes of the Bathhouse Berry and pasty face Tom Steyer are all over the airwaves bashing Trump / Pro Prop 50.

The pro Prop 50 ads are mostly about how bad President Trump is...Those ads work...I am not happy about that...But, that is the reality...

About Tom Steyer...I find that guy very annoying...I do not know if he knows that many people find him irritating...

15 posted on 11/01/2025 6:08:43 PM PDT by L.A.Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Democrats don’t believe in representative government.


16 posted on 11/01/2025 7:12:47 PM PDT by aimhigh (1 John 3:23 "And THIS is His commandment . . . . ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson