Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Asked to Resolve $12B Dispute
Sun Herald (TCA) ^ | Sarah Bennett

Posted on 09/06/2025 11:47:40 PM PDT by where's_the_Outrage?

The Department of Justice (DOJ) is asking the Supreme Court to lift a district court injunction that currently blocks the administration from withholding $12 billion in foreign aid funds appropriated by Congress. The move has sparked criticism from foreign-aid organizations and Democratic lawmakers, who argued that it threatens to undermine Congress’s constitutional authority over federal spending. Solicitor General D. John Sauer warned the government could be forced to obligate expiring funds without relief.

Sauer said, “will effectively force the government to rapidly obligate some $12 billion in foreign-aid funds that would expire September 30 and to continue obligating tens of billions of dollars more — overriding the Executive Branch’s foreign-policy judgments regarding whether to pursue rescissions and thwarting interbranch dialogue.”

U.S. District Judge Amir Ali ordered the administration to resume billions in Congress-approved grant payments. The administration appealed the injunction to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and then to the Supreme Court.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit vacated the injunction in a 2-1 decision but has not issued a mandate. Judge Karen L. Henderson wrote for the majority that the plaintiffs lacked a proper cause of action.

Plaintiffs argued the executive branch can’t unilaterally withhold appropriated funds. The D.C. Circuit ruled only the Government Accountability Office can sue under the Impoundment Control Act.

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: foreignassistance; foreignpolicy; judgewatch; lawfare; scotus; usassistance
A new administration should not be forced to continue the previous administration's policies.
1 posted on 09/06/2025 11:47:40 PM PDT by where's_the_Outrage?
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Cut the baby in half?


2 posted on 09/07/2025 12:11:42 AM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
The move has sparked criticism from foreign-aid organizations and Democratic lawmakers...

The group was called The Drifters, not The Grifters. /humor

3 posted on 09/07/2025 12:16:36 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
There goes my baby
4 posted on 09/07/2025 12:19:14 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

“...funds appropriated by Congress...”

That’s not continuing the previous administration’s policy.

Unless the funds were left to the discretion of the previous admin’s discretion to distribute as they saw fit. If they were specifically designated spending, seems to me the proper thing would be for Congress to rescind the spending.
I don’t know on this one...


5 posted on 09/07/2025 3:07:44 AM PDT by Adder (End fascism...defeat all Democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

“asking the Supreme Court to lift a district court injunction that currently blocks the administration from withholding $12 billion in foreign aid funds appropriated by Congress.”

With the regal, low level judges running the country now, why do we need Congre$$ or the $upreme Clown$ of the US?


6 posted on 09/08/2025 6:23:31 AM PDT by antidemoncrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Adder

I would be surprised if there aren’t cases where the incoming administration stopping appropriated funds from congress based on different policies.


7 posted on 09/08/2025 6:35:40 AM PDT by where's_the_Outrage? (Drain the Swamp. Build the Wall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

The democrats need their kickback money


8 posted on 09/08/2025 6:38:09 AM PDT by butlerweave (Fateh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

What insane places was this money going ?


9 posted on 09/08/2025 6:40:54 AM PDT by butlerweave (Fateh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Who, what when, where and why?

Let’s start with WHO the plaintiffs are?

Former USAID employees? Standing is always the first issue.

Absent standing you have no case. Sheesh.


10 posted on 09/08/2025 7:01:29 AM PDT by Tunehead54 (Nothing funny here ;-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Where are the recission packages? Should send one per day to congress. Otherwise you will loose in court. Congress allocates the funds.


11 posted on 09/08/2025 8:10:42 AM PDT by kvanbrunt2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Adder

proper thing would be for Congress to rescind the spending.>>> I agree and i think it is poor discipline for the Trump admin to declare emergencies and not send recission packages to congress.


12 posted on 09/08/2025 8:12:16 AM PDT by kvanbrunt2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

All of them.


13 posted on 09/08/2025 10:50:37 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
Congress authorizes and appropriates for expenditures for the executive branch. Congress does not do the actual spending. The money should only be used for what its been authorized for, and you cant spend more, but there is nothing to say that the authorized dollars must be spent. Any unused funds should immediately be returned to the treasury.


14 posted on 09/08/2025 11:04:59 AM PDT by Magnum44 (...against all enemies, foreign and domestic... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

The MSM mentioned this hold on the money.
Everyone thinks that Biden & crew parked that money in a Private Bank to keep President Trump from taking ‘their’ money away.

Here’s what they didn’t say.

They had no clue that President Trump would be able to go after the money. They didn’t park it in a private bank to lock President Trump out.

They just had developed the habit of parking government funds in private banks because...... it allows for a greater set of options.

The banks love it and keep it on the down low.
The politicians can skim money off the top because the money is under control of the bank and the banks aren’t responsible for approving or accounting for any ‘expenses’ the money undergoes during the distribution phase. The fundees get the money they are expecting and everyone is happy. Especially the politicians. They get to ladle off the cream and ensure No one asks why $12 billion was authorized but only $10 billion reached it’s target.


15 posted on 09/08/2025 11:14:06 AM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson