Judge denies DOJ bid to unseal Ghislaine Maxwell grand jury records

NBC News ^ | August 11, 2025 | Chloe Atkins, Tom Winter and Rebecca Shabad

[pepsi_junkie]

Judge: Upon my review, there's nothing in there that implicates anyone in any crimes. Also, we need to keep this all hidden.

They wonder why we don't trust them after 5 years of this sort of BS.

[Red Badger]

Judge: “Trust me, there’s nothing there. Move along comrade.....”....................

[Red Badger]

Judge: “Trust me, there’s nothing there. Move along comrade.....”....................

[Robert DeLong]

Who made this judge the last word? Oh that's right, he doesn't have the last word. But to delay is to deny. Question is why does he want to deny?

Supreme Court set this clown straight, and overrule his stupidity.

[13Sisters76]

Do these damn “judges” think they were appointed “god”? What don’t they understand about the Constitution and the separation of powers?
KICK THEM OUT and dis-bar them!

[masadaman]

Then why did Prince Andrew pay out $millions in a civil suit and in the process get alienated as a Royal? Asking for a friend.

[Jamestown1630]

I can think of many reasons why someone called to testify before a grand jury would want the records to remain sealed.

[Sacajaweau]

As it should be....Grand Jurys are only guessing. The proof is in the trials.

[Sarah Barracuda]

An Obama judge doesnt want this out..must mean it implicates Dems

[Jamestown1630]

Maybe it has something to do with protecting witnesses and the integrity of the process.

[Red Badger]

Nah, couldn’t be, Obama is as clean as a whistle, right?................

[Sacajaweau]

I believe the Monarchy told Andrew that the Monarchy does not launder publically....and so Prince Andrew contributed to her “cause”...some group she started.

[af_vet_1981]

Prince Andrew is already known.

“Its entire premise — that the Maxwell grand jury materials would bring to light meaningful new information about Epstein’s and Maxwell’s crimes, or the Government’s investigation into them—is demonstrably false,” he wrote.

[Sacajaweau]

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/queen-elizabeth-defended-prince-andrew-083045699.html

[bray]

Can a Justice of the Peace deny Presidential Orders too?

[Red Badger]

Apparently so..............

[Fury]

Maybe it has something to do with protecting witnesses and the integrity of the process.

That's. not going to fly on this thread, as the public's right to know is superior to anything else for several posters.

Of course, that is an ignorant and legally weak argument, but who quibble over those trivial matters?

Hint to those posters - the public has no "right" to view GJ testimony or records. And the President can't order that testimony or records released if a judge decides otherwise.

[Jeff Vader]

Here’s how you know there’s nothing incriminating for T$ in it

[OldHarbor]

” Contrary to the Government’s depiction, the Maxwell grand jury testimony is not a matter of significant historical or public interest. Far from it. It consists of garden-variety summary testimony by two law enforcement agents.”

Paul A. Engelmayer

"You may be an undigested bit of beef, a blot of mustard, a crumb of cheese, a fragment of underdone potato. There's more of gravy than of grave about you, whatever you are!"