Posted on 12/04/2024 8:17:40 PM PST by SeekAndFind
The first and most famous was pretty much her introduction to the entire country as the soon-to-be Supreme Court Justice who could not define what a woman was because?
BECAUSE?
Not a biologist™.
Remember that time Kentaji Brown Jackson, now a Supreme Court Justice could not give a definition for "woman"
Good times 🤦♀️ pic.twitter.com/L1sh4a41rF— Kat™ The Hammer ⚒️ (@KatTheHammer1) March 19, 2024
Ho, boy.
There have been some memorable stumbles since, but today?
Today, she has come close to eclipsing that moment in the sun.
The case being heard is a challenge to a Tennessee law that bars 'risky gender transition interventions for minors.' That's the key to the whole brouhaha right there - for minors.
On December 4, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in one of the most significant cases of this term, United States v. Skrmetti. The question before the Court is whether Tennessee Senate Bill 1 (SB1), which bars risky gender-transition interventions for minors, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Two years after Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Court is being asked to make up a constitutional rule to take another area of contentious policy away from the people and their elected representatives. The Court of the past sometimes could not resist taking that bait, but the current Court has a much better sense when it comes to legally baseless power grabs.
By its terms, SB1 prohibits all medical treatments intended to allow “a minor to identify with, or live as, a purported identity inconsistent with the minor’s sex” or to treat “purported discomfort or distress from a discordance between the minor’s sex and asserted identity.” Three minors, their parents, and a doctor challenged the law on substantive due process and equal protection theories. The district court held the law facially unconstitutional and preliminarily enjoined all but the surgical prohibition. A 2–1 panel of the Sixth Circuit reversed. In his panel opinion, Chief Judge Jeffrey Sutton rejected both the equal protection and substantive due process claims. He noted that SB1 was based not on sex, but “on presumptively valid age and medical conditions,” and it “treat[ed] similarly situated individuals evenhandedly.” Under those circumstances, the law did not trigger heightened scrutiny.
Again, the Sixth Circuit ruled in its reversal that the law was based on valid age requirements and medical conditions, which treated all individuals equally.
We're talking about allowing children to be mutilated for life without being of an age where informed consent is possible, for a "condition" that is not life-threatening and, in many quarters, is considered to be a mental disease that these same children grow out of as raging hormones subside and brains mature.
John had a great rundown of some of the highlights of all the justices' comments today, but KBJ's, oooh.
I have to admit it caught my attention because it was so out to lunch on a comparative scale that I had to play it again.
Brown-Jackson somehow managed to conflate? Confuse? The permanent mutilation of a minor child's body to interracial marriage.
I am completely lost.
Yes, because banning a white person from marrying a black person is the same thing as cutting off a 10-year-old's gen*tals.— Collin Rugg (@CollinRugg) December 4, 2024
Admittedly, it was almost as if Sotomayor was playing warm-up for her.
I can't find "May surgically remove your genitals" on the aspirin warning label. 😳— KennyB (@kenoba_d) December 4, 2024
Yes, two Bayer's are just like puberty blockers forever stunting your sexual development, or losing both breasts or your tiny, undeveloped testicles forever.
Same-same.
VURT IN THE ACTUAL FURK?
When you put the two together...I mean, your head hurts.
Sonia Sotomayor: "Using 'gender-affirming care on children is like taking aspirin!"
Ketanji Brown Jackson: "If you want to ban 'gender-affirming care' for kids, then you're like people who wanted to ban interracial marriage."
It's only funny until you remember that these nutjobs have lifetime appointments on the highest court in the land.pic.twitter.com/ilbJuSZHjz— Jeff Charles, Doni's St. Bernard🏴 (@jeffcharlesjr) December 4, 2024
...Ketanji Brown Jackson: "If you want to ban 'gender-affirming care' for kids, then you're like people who wanted to ban interracial marriage."
It's only funny until you remember that these nutjobs have lifetime appointments on the highest court in the land.
Media is already moaning that SCOTUS appears to be leaning towards upholding the TN ban, and thank God, for the children's sake.
No such thing as a trans kid, just parents with mental problems— Braeden (@BraedenSorbo) December 4, 2024
Let them make their own decisions about what to lop off when they're adult enough to know what it is they're going to lose.
What they will irreversibly lose if allowed to do this to themselves before they understand what it means.
Even then, they may not, but at least they will have lived life in the skin they were born in.
'Every day you'll stare in the mirror studying every shadow, every hint of your former face, convinced it is shining through. You'll try to hide it with makeup, long hair and more makeup.
But you'll always see him.
Your clothes won't fit right. You're too tall, too lanky.'— Chad Felix Greene 🇮🇱 (@chadfelixg) December 4, 2024
In the meantime, marvel at what sits on the court and know it's only by the grace of God that they are not in the majority.
Man.
I need a handful of ibuprofen.
p
There must be some infraction or other that can pry them out of SCOTUS.
I would love to know what Justice Thomas was thinking, listening to these idiots.
“There are time you can’t even” WHAT ?
KJB isn’t capable of a coherent thought but please offer a coherent headline!
She won’t be there for life. I guarantee it.
Seriously time for impeachments on the Supreme Court. we have become such a laughing stock for the world that still lives within the realm of sanity.
Millennial Diagnosed With Tragic Inability To Even
https://babylonbee.com/news/millennial-diagnosed-tragic-inability-even
See post 8.
Jumanji...
Justice Thomas enduring the stupid justices....
Although the information on it has been suppressed since I first encountered it in the 1990s, associating with lower IQ people reduces your own intelligence slightly.
Also, statistics that supported the fact that the peak of intelligence was for the Baby Boomers and average IQ has declined decade by decade since then, have been removed by search engines. All they permit now are articles saying “IQs declined again; lowest in decades.” Average is now down to 98.
Here’s something you can’t find with searches today.
When I was in junior high (not “middle school”)in the 1960s one of my teachers led a political battle against HUD and its threats of civil rights measures to force changes in schools in Michigan. Not Little Rock.
I saw him on TV giving a speech: “They say if black kids sit near white kids they will improve their brains by White Magic. I don’t believe in White Magic. Let HUD take its HUD money and pack its HUD bags and get out of town.” (cheers)
Exhilarating but inexcusable.
Her presence on The Court mocks the country and The Court.
Yeah, kadeesha Jackson brown is a certified brain trust.
After her aspirin analogy, I might have said, “It sounds like you’ve been taking some Biology classes in order to improve your understanding of gender.
The sum of the IQ’s of Ketanji and Kimrade: Over or under 150?
She was anointed because she is a drone who will do exactly what the democrats want without getting orders. She is a programmed robot from years of brainwashing in AA course work. She is a very dumb woman but a foot soldier of the revolution. Being black was her suit of armor.
A not very wise Latina and a black person who doesn’t know what a woman is. Two picks by democrat presidents. A person should at least have an IQ above room temperature to serve on the supreme court. These two women fail to meet that standard. They were nominated by a foreign usurper and a corrupt vegetable.
the left's goal is to destroy our republic.
so it infiltrates all three branches and sabotages each from within.
it seeks to destroy its purpose, its role, its structures , its processes, its ability to carry out its proper functions,
by making a mockery of each branch in any way possible.
like removing the spokes in a bicycle wheel.
rational judgments is her first target to eliminate.
shes doing a bang up job .
After reading through the questions the justices were asking in those sessions, I determined that the average U.S. Supreme Court justice is less intelligent and competent than my typical high school classmate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.