Posted on 09/08/2024 5:18:03 AM PDT by T Ruth
An important anniversary [is today]. This anniversary carries implications for how we receive news, how political campaigns are conducted, and the credibility of almost everything we see or hear from the media.
On September 8, 2004, CBS’s “60 Minutes” used forged government documents as the basis for a story that attacked the military record of then-President George W. Bush. It was bad enough that CBS used forged government documents, but what made it worse was that CBS aired this story during the presidential election and timed the airing to coincide with the rollout of Democrat John Kerry’s “favorite son” campaign theme. CBS thus provided the “news” upon which the Democrat candidate based his attack ads. The CBS story was quickly disproven and eventually forced CBS into personnel changes and investigations. Dan Rather was forced into retirement a few months later. But CBS did not give up before a lengthy battle in which bloggers demonstrated that the font and other features in the forged documents did not exist in 1972 (the date placed on the forgeries).
The battle over the truth became a story in itself. The truth about the font spread like wildfire through the blogosphere and the internet, quickly picking up steam. ...
The result was a victory for the truth and a blow to the establishment media. CBS was proven to have lied to influence a presidential election. ...
Why is a 2004 scandal at CBS still relevant [twenty] years later? Even without Dan Rather, the network has not truly changed. The other networks are just as bad – if not worse. Rathergate serves as one example of what the establishment media do. They lie. They lie regularly, and they lie during election years to help elect Democrats. ...
***
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
... and FR played a prominent role in exposing CBS's lies.
Buckhead!
It was the beginning of the end of Dan Rather on the national big stage.
But he was succeeded by Lyan Williams eventually. So I guess there’s no end to the stuff we have to deal with.
Smells like election interference. When is Dan’s court date?
What was the journalist scandal when it was discovered that 100s of them were sharing/cooperating and sometimes conniving with private email communications?
Journolist
I was here!
I remember. I was a lurker at the time, but I remember how members here showed off their investigative prowess in proving that CBS and Dan Rather lied.
It was very impressive.
They not only lie, they do so in many deceptive forms that the average American fails to see and os influenced by.
Omission of facts
Lack of full disclosure
Failure to give opposing narratives equal unedited air time
Use of got you phrases to lable things, (the accused),
The much abused paralipsis, deferring us to the mind set of what they want whether it is what they say the accepted is our an expert groups plurality comes up with.
And the drum beat of perpetual FAKE news.
I personally don’t watch (subject myself to it) fake news, but if I did I would watch OAN.
OAN was dropped by delect TV then I summarily drop kicked them and all satellite tv out of my house.
The red pill is out there, talk is really being stifled.
Good Sunday to you all.
Fake but accurate.
Here’s a thread from that night. Buckhead comment at #47.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1210662/posts
To: Howlin
Howlin, every single one of these memos to file is in a proportionally spaced font, probably Palatino or Times New Roman.
In 1972 people used typewriters for this sort of thing, and typewriters used monospaced fonts.
The use of proportionally spaced fonts did not come into common use for office memos until the introduction of laser printers, word processing software, and personal computers. They were not widespread until the mid to late 90’s. Before then, you needed typesetting equipment, and that wasn’t used for personal memos to file. Even the Wang systems that were dominant in the mid 80’s used monospaced fonts.
I am saying these documents are forgeries, run through a copier for 15 generations to make them look old.
This should be pursued aggressively.
47 posted on 9/9/2004, 6:59:43 AM by Buckhead
That scandal never got the coverage and the permanent place in media history that it deserves, just like Rathergate and its place in history of the media and presidential politics.
I remember that.
Those of us with military experience recognized some of the irregular writing of those docs
“””I remember. I was a lurker at the time”””
That night was when I realized that I wasn’t a member, I had used that typewriter and wanted to make a post on the thread and realized that for so long I had only been reading and had never signed up, as it was, the moment passed and I still didn’t sign up.
It was a Freeper who first noticed that the numeral designation of George Bush’s unit didn’t look right.
The the “137th” or which ever number it was had a “superscript ‘th’” ... meaning the the was half way up the 137 and not “on-line.”
Superscripts came with MicroSoft Word in the mid-’90s?
HOORAY Buckhead!
Such as it is, the press has become the greatest power within the Western World, more powerful than the legislature, the executive and judiciary. One would like to ask, by whom has it been elected and to whom is it responsible?
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Citizen journalist BUMP!
I remember reading that Buckhead post and thinking ‘This has the Ring Of Truth’.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.