Posted on 07/15/2024 11:58:45 AM PDT by bitt
Former Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Weissmann said Monday on MSNBC’s “Ana Cabrera Reports” that Judge Aileen Cannon’s dismissal of former President Donald Trump’s classified documents case in Florida is an “opportunity” for the 11th Circuit to remove Cannon if they think that this was frivolous.
Weissmann said, “I think it’s really important what Barb said, to think about what are the next steps because this is not a decision on the merits it’s about the procedure that was used. While I think that the bulk of the law, the balance of the law is squarely against Judge Cannon, this is something that the 11th Circuit or the Supreme Court can remedy.”
He continued, “It is also an opportunity for the 11th Circuit to remove Judge Cannon if they think that this is a particularly frivolous ground, something that a decision that had been rejected by three D.C. and Eastern District of Virginia courts. It also is the opportunity potentially for Jack Smith to think about a different venue for bringing these charges.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Dream on Buddy. 😉
So says the corrupt anti-constitution Deep State player.
And that’s how you destroy “democracy.”
Given that a Justice of the Supreme Court dedicated about three pages of an opinion to what Judge Cannon just ruled, they’re not going to decide it’s frivolous.
Justice Thomas effectively told Cannon to do exactly what she just did.
How about they remove that hack Weissman from the planet.
Looks like the same person, but one has a wig on.
Stevens?
Weissman needs to go to prison,
Nah, he needs to get run over by a NYC trash truck . ooops.
I was joking, but if you switch the glasses and the wig, I couldn’t tell them apart.
Prison b*tch is more fitting for Weissman, he might be top of my list for prison
Hmm maybe
“This crazy talk comes from the lead prosecutor used to go after Trump last time - in a case so weak even they had to give it up.
Federal judges do NOT get removed for making decisions.”
Federal judges regularly get recused for conflicts or bias, but most of them recuse themselves. Smith will attempt to show a pattern of legally unsupported decisions and ask he appeals court to reassign the case to a more experienced and unbiased judge. Bet on it.
Decisions are not a basis for proving bias. Doesn’t work that way. Takes much much more.
“...something that a decision that had been rejected by three D.C. and Eastern District of Virginia courts.”
These are the people who should be “corrected.”
I should have said “removed.” I was thinking the article used the word “corrected.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.