Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 07/15/2024 11:58:45 AM PDT by bitt
Former Assistant U.S. Attorney Andrew Weissmann said Monday on MSNBC’s “Ana Cabrera Reports” that Judge Aileen Cannon’s dismissal of former President Donald Trump’s classified documents case in Florida is an “opportunity” for the 11th Circuit to remove Cannon if they think that this was frivolous.
Weissmann said, “I think it’s really important what Barb said, to think about what are the next steps because this is not a decision on the merits it’s about the procedure that was used. While I think that the bulk of the law, the balance of the law is squarely against Judge Cannon, this is something that the 11th Circuit or the Supreme Court can remedy.”
He continued, “It is also an opportunity for the 11th Circuit to remove Judge Cannon if they think that this is a particularly frivolous ground, something that a decision that had been rejected by three D.C. and Eastern District of Virginia courts. It also is the opportunity potentially for Jack Smith to think about a different venue for bringing these charges.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
P
Yes, because citing the constitution is ‘frivilous’
These people are so scared! Good.
If liberals don’t like a ruling from a judge, they want to impeach the judge. That’s how they roll. If there are sanctions short of impeachment they will go for that.
MSNBC apparently has only been covering this topic since the news dropped and the attempt on Trump’s life as a news cycle topic is out the door.
He can wish in one hand and crap in the other. See which one fills up first. Her ruling will stand.
Sometimes I wonder if Weissmann even went to law school. Or if he has even read the Constitution.
This crazy talk comes from the lead prosecutor used to go after Trump last time - in a case so weak even they had to give it up.
Federal judges do NOT get removed for making decisions.
I figured they’d simply have her assassinated, since that seems to be their favorite go-to method.
Maybe Dems can try that in Congress, there are rules to impeach a judge. They won’t get far.
Schnorrer tosses boomerang, fails to understand Cannon’s non-removal makes her ruling substantive on firm Constitutional grounds. Boomerang undamaged by return contact with marshmellow.
Lol. You are going to bounce her for ruling the exact way Justice Thomas saw it.
Following that “logic” SCOTUS could remove Merchan...
Weissmann is an evil little prick who should be in jail for withholding evidence and causing a innocent person to serve jail time.
Remove her? Because agreeing with the logic of a SCOTUS justice is a high crime, if it’s Clarence Thomas. Makes sense.
The final scenes in "Goodfellas" haunts their quiet nights trying to get some sleep. It will be their own that consume them in awful ways. Ala, Seth Rich.
Weissmann is scum. He really is.
The same 11th Circuit that is overseen by Justice Thomas?
Yes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.