Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Raskin: Clarence Thomas Should Recuse Himself from Trump-14th Amendment Decision
Breitbart ^ | 12/31/2023 | Pam Key

Posted on 12/31/2023 10:57:35 AM PST by ChicagoConservative27

Representative Jamie Raskin (D-MD) said Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union” that he believed Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas “absolutely should recuse himself” from decisions on President Donald Trump’s ballot access case, adding, “the question is, what do we do if he doesn’t?”

Dana Bash asked, “Three of the sitting justices were appointed by Donald Trump and in addition to that, Justice Clarence Thomas’ wife, Ginny, texted Mark Meadows about the 2020 election, the lead up to January 6th, as you well know. Should any of the justices recuse themselves if they take this up?”

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: amendment; fabricatedreality; raskin; thomas; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last
To: ChicagoConservative27

If all justices with even a hint of conflict recuse themselves, who would be left to judge the case?


21 posted on 12/31/2023 11:27:07 AM PST by Reno89519 (It's war. No one murders and takes Americans hostage. Time to act. Declare war on Islamic Hamas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right
Sounds like the Democrats are setting up an argument to ignore a Supreme Court ruling. Can they get away with that?

Depends on whose side the Army takes.

This is not your father's USA.

22 posted on 12/31/2023 11:27:43 AM PST by Jim Noble (The future belongs to those who show up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

<< Sounds like the Democrats are setting up an argument to ignore a Supreme Court ruling. Can they get away with that? No>>

I think that has been done before by Biden…..forgiving student debt.
They can do what ever they want, who is going to do anything about it ?


23 posted on 12/31/2023 11:28:45 AM PST by megaMAGA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

NONE of these hacks EVER called for RBG to recuse herself from abortion rulings or rulings where she had given speeches proclaiming support of various leftist causes.


24 posted on 12/31/2023 11:29:57 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

He “should”? Only the Justice involved knows if he “should”, so the Justice gets to decide.


25 posted on 12/31/2023 11:31:08 AM PST by SaxxonWoods (Are you ready for Black Lives MAGA? It's coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Democrats never recuse.


26 posted on 12/31/2023 11:31:34 AM PST by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

How does that work with SCOTUS? Can a judge be excluded from considering a case by a vote of his/her fellow judges? Or is the only way for him/her to say “sorry,I’m out”?


27 posted on 12/31/2023 11:39:02 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Proudly Clinging To My Guns And My Religion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Oh ok, he will get right on that.


28 posted on 12/31/2023 11:40:40 AM PST by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

I don’t see any violence breaking out over this. More likely there’d be deliberate foot-dragging.

Supreme Court: You cannot remove Trump’s name from the ballot.
Democrat official: I think I can. In fact, I just did.

Supreme Court: Put his name back on the ballot, immediately!
Democrat official: Well, okay. I’ll get around to it.

To paraphrase Stalin, how many divisions has the Supreme Court?


29 posted on 12/31/2023 11:41:24 AM PST by Leaning Right (The steal is real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Supreme Court: We’ll declare your electors null and void until you put him back on the ballot.


30 posted on 12/31/2023 11:44:53 AM PST by Windcatcher (Time to fly the black flag -- one of no quarter for Marxists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Windcatcher

There are no Presidential elections and no “voting for President” in the Constitution.

The President is appointed by the State Legislatures, who choose 535 Electors to make the choice.

This is a plenary power of State Legislatures, the courts have nothing to do with it.


31 posted on 12/31/2023 11:53:03 AM PST by Jim Noble (The future belongs to those who show up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Jaime Ratskin should just shut up.


32 posted on 12/31/2023 11:54:53 AM PST by MIchaelTArchangel (Make the World Safe for Humanity--Kill the Terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Jamie,
After pissing up that rope, recuse yourself from LIFE!

We will be thankful, at last.


33 posted on 12/31/2023 11:55:01 AM PST by BatGuano (2020 = Stolen Election. Believe it! Molon Labe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

This time is different!

Our existence is new and novel.

Kanye West and Jamie Diamond are 500/1-I’m sure a construct can be created that results in that match up. Given the broad imaginative skills on hand.


34 posted on 12/31/2023 11:57:01 AM PST by Freest Republican (This space for rent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MIchaelTArchangel

If Clarence Thomas is pissing off liberals he is HAPPY, no way in hell will he refuse himself!!!


35 posted on 12/31/2023 12:00:58 PM PST by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Raskin should shut the F’ck up. The left never recuses.


36 posted on 12/31/2023 12:17:28 PM PST by pacificus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_Watchman
Raskin: Clarence Thomas Should Recuse Himself from Trump-14th Amendment Decision

Yet, amazingly, despite chief justice roberts claim of no bias in judges,
crickets from the limp noodle chief justice john roberts.

37 posted on 12/31/2023 12:19:30 PM PST by chief lee runamok ( Le Flâneur @Large)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

RatSkin should recuse himself from Congress because he is clearly an enemy of America.


38 posted on 12/31/2023 12:29:04 PM PST by jmaroneps37 (Freedom is never free. It must be won rewon and jealously guarded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump Girl Kit Cat

Just to be safe, Justice Thomas should avoid west Texas dude ranches.


39 posted on 12/31/2023 12:29:06 PM PST by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ChicagoConservative27

Let’s compromise, Ginnie Thomas can refuse herself.


40 posted on 12/31/2023 12:49:43 PM PST by muir_redwoods (Freedom isn't free, liberty isn't liberal and you'll never find anything Right on the Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson