Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Can Be ‘Racist’?
The Harvard Crimson ^ | August 10, 2018 | Michelle I. Gao

Posted on 08/28/2023 2:53:11 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Michelle I. Gao ’21, a Crimson Editorial editor, lives in Adams House. Her column appears on alternate Thursdays.

It bemuses me that some absolve non-white people of racism. They declare point-blank, “It’s literally impossible to be racist to a white person.” “Racism against white people doesn’t exist.”

I suppose that as an Asian American, I would qualify as a recipient of this exemption. While that could be convenient, I don’t think I — or any other person of color — should deserve such an exemption. I’m sure, for example, that I can be racist (I imagine some might call me that from reading this column), and I’d like to be engaged in conversation if I mess up, perhaps by making a distasteful remark.

The debate about whether all people can be racist stems from different definitions of “racism.” One camp subscribes to the standard dictionary definition: racism is “prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one’s own race is superior.” There are no restrictions on which races can be the instigators and what magnitude of disdain counts as “superiority.”

Another camp thinks primarily of institutional racism and factors in a person’s power to use their racist beliefs against others. As one African-American lead character from the 2014 movie “Dear White People” argues, “Black people can’t be racist. Prejudiced, yes, but not racist. Racism describes a system of disadvantage based on race. Black people can’t be racists since we don’t stand to benefit from such a system.”

What a convoluted way to absolve oneself of possible racist fault. Under this definition, yes, black individuals can’t be racist. The system is rigged in favor of white people, who have traditionally been in power. But the strange implication of this statement is that being called “prejudiced” isn’t as bad as being called a “racist” — although racism can manifest itself as prejudice, and though prejudice surely is not desired either. So Sam’s argument achieves the linguistic triumph of avoiding the label “racist,” but that’s about it.

This argument’s main point — that minorities can’t be racist because they have no power to act on such antagonism — is also reductive. We shouldn’t have to take stock of each other’s race and relative power in society before making a judgment on an act itself. We shouldn’t have to condone prejudice or discrimination against anyone, for any reason.

Racism is individual, not just institutional. As individuals, we all have the power to hurt one another. However, though power dynamics of race in our society shouldn’t absolve some races from the ability to be racist, they should affect how we determine degrees of racism. I’d argue that, on average, a racist comment would cause a white person less harm or fear than it would cause a black person. I’m not sure how exactly one could measure that, but white people have it easier in America, and that shouldn’t be a controversial statement.

Consider the recent controversy involving Sarah Jeong, a writer of Asian descent, whose colorful tweets against white people were dug up after the New York Times’ editorial board hired her. Such tweets included: “oh man it’s kind of sick how much joy I get out of being cruel to old white men”; “fuck white women lol”; “dumbass fucking white people marking up the internet with their opinions like dogs pissing on fire hydrants.” While not condoning her tweets, The Times stood by Jeong, who also issued her own statement.

This seemed like the best resolution. I thought it was important, as the Times did, to deny the right-wing trolls who are orchestrating smear campaigns to get journalists fired and to reserve judgment of their employees for what they actually do at their jobs.

But the tweets were pretty racist. I didn’t see the point of those insisting that Jeong’s tweets weren’t racist at all and that she had nothing to apologize for, because “there was no sense of threat associated” with her jokes. After winning this round, since Jeong wasn’t fired, refusing to budge an inch and admit some wrongdoing is not a good look for the left.

Because there’s no scenario in which racism is not a bad thing. If some extremists won’t engage in good faith, we can’t force them. But at least among the rest of us, we can do better. We shouldn’t need to compare how a possible act of racism would differ if perpetrated against blacks, whites, or Asians just to understand if it’s wrong. We shouldn’t allow some people to indulge in their racism just because they may not have any power to systematically discriminate against other groups. Let’s acknowledge the existence of so-called “reverse racism” and the existence of degrees of racism. Otherwise, discourse around race will become a race to the bottom.

Michelle I. Gao ’21, a Crimson Editorial editor, lives in Adams House. Her column appears on alternate Thursdays.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 08/28/2023 2:53:11 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Can I, can I, please, please, please???


2 posted on 08/28/2023 2:54:38 PM PDT by Jim W N (MAGA by restoring the Gospel of the Grace of Christ (Jude 3) and our Free Constitutional Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

People who talk about race are racists.


3 posted on 08/28/2023 2:55:15 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (They say "Our Democracy" but they mean Cosa Nostra.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
An entire population of brainwashed people who are unable to reason have decided to fixate on “racism” instead of seeing the fractures in society as a tool of those in power.

The true fight is against the multinationals-cum-government-cum billionaires.

So long as they can focus everyone's attention on societal issues that are ridiculous on their face, no attention will be focused on the First Cause of this fight.

4 posted on 08/28/2023 3:03:02 PM PDT by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

‘the standard dictionary definition: racism is “prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one’s own race is superior.” ‘

So...if a person of one race believes that race can’t be racist regarding other races, that person believes his own race is superior because it can’t be racist...which means he’s racist?


5 posted on 08/28/2023 3:03:52 PM PDT by KrisKrinkle (c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Great column Michelle- now expect to be cancelled because of it


6 posted on 08/28/2023 3:05:07 PM PDT by God luvs America (63.5 million pay no income tax and vote for DemoKrats...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Another camp thinks primarily of institutional racism and factors in a person’s power to use their racist beliefs against others. As one African-American lead character from the 2014 movie “Dear White People” argues, “Black people can’t be racist. Prejudiced, yes, but not racist. Racism describes a system of disadvantage based on race. Black people can’t be racists since we don’t stand to benefit from such a system.”

 

The biggest racial problem we have in America is black racism, bigotry, hatred, whatever against other blacks.

And that cultural racism spills over to whites, Asians, hispanics and etc.

Then maybe white racism towards blacks. Based on the many disadvantages blacks have put white people through based on black racism.

BLM being a perfect example of how and why white racism towards blacks may exist.

7 posted on 08/28/2023 3:10:16 PM PDT by Responsibility2nd (A truth that’s told with bad intent, Beats all the lies you can invent ~ Wm. Blake)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Racism SHOULD be a morally neutral term. There are almost as many experiences with race as there are people, and no one has a right to discount that experience.

When a disproportionate number of a particular race engage in uniform anti-social behavior, you are well within your rights to presume that all members of that race will act accordingly, unless they prove otherwise.

That’s not racism. That’s rationality.


8 posted on 08/28/2023 3:15:49 PM PDT by fwdude (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR; nickcarraway
I agree that race has been weaponized by many as a distraction. But people keep lapping it up.

For example, take the “blacks have to clean up their community” sentiment. It gets raised here from time to time. And has many fans. And so we remain divided.

But turn the tables for a moment. Do whites have an equal collective responsibility to “clean up their community”?

If blacks have a collective responsibility to “their” community, then whites have blood on their hands for every destructive thing done by Pelosi, the Klintons, Schumer, Bidet, Merrill Garland, Comey, Dan Rather, Rosie O’Donnel, Ellen Degenerate, Greta Thunberg’s parents, Paul Ryan, and Bruce Springsteen, just to name a few of my white peeps.

That visceral GTFOOH feeling any white guy or gal just had at my comment, is prolly how blacks feel when someone talks about cleaning up “Their” community. Which helps keep us separated, instead of United again the True Threats you outlined.


9 posted on 08/28/2023 3:23:23 PM PDT by DoodleBob (Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s²)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Once again I am going to question if "racism" even exists.

The word was invented just a little over 100 years ago. It is odd that something so wide spread would not have a word to describe it until so recently.

Humans are a verbal group and have come up with any number of words to describe any number of things. Even things that are relatively rare. But somehow, not this.

Just something to think about.

10 posted on 08/28/2023 3:26:05 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Keep America Beautiful by keeping Canadian Trash Out. Deport Jennifer Granholm!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Racism should only be applied to individuals, not “races.”

To accuse an entire “race” of people of racism is nonsense.


11 posted on 08/28/2023 3:52:58 PM PDT by MV=PY (The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
The whole idea of "institutional racism" was invented to absolve black people of any evil they commit, and to smear all white people regardless of how they live their lives.

It is an inherently irrational, emotional, concept.

12 posted on 08/28/2023 4:03:08 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

You can sell this BS to the majority of low, yes lower than average on the Bell Curve, people of the race or group too dumb to understand they are racists in denial. The larger the number by population of low IQ people has been documented but the information is suppressed.


13 posted on 08/28/2023 6:32:06 PM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KrisKrinkle

It means they are making the admission they are inferior therefore incapable of being a racist... see how that works. They are literally too stupid to understand that hating whites when black is racist.


14 posted on 08/28/2023 6:34:58 PM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jumper

So, you side with the Democrats and leftists?


15 posted on 08/28/2023 6:52:16 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

No, “institutional racism” was created to allow leftists to control our society. Stop falling for their B.S.


16 posted on 08/28/2023 6:53:30 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
No, “institutional racism” was created to allow leftists to control our society. Stop falling for their B.S.

True, but: The whole idea of "institutional racism" was invented to absolve black people of any evil they commit, and to smear all white people regardless of how they live their lives.

Is a step toward that goal. The idea is to destroy society first. It is clearly laid out in their books about why they are doing this.

17 posted on 08/28/2023 8:32:21 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Better question: What isn’t racist?


18 posted on 08/28/2023 8:43:41 PM PDT by Robwin ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

bttt


19 posted on 08/28/2023 10:47:39 PM PDT by nopardons ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Racism describes a system of disadvantage based on race. Black people can’t be racists since we don’t stand to benefit from such a system.”

Anti-white racism is endemic throughout corporate America and government bureaucracy. You have people who openly hate white people and will use their power against us.

20 posted on 08/28/2023 10:55:28 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Either you will rule. Or you will be ruled. There is no other choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson