Posted on 08/17/2023 10:32:37 AM PDT by deks
It seems criminal charges are warranted.
What are the implications of this for the current charges against Trump?
Yep. Dems and many repubs alike did nothing about it.
Trump’s petition to contest the Georgia election
Full verified .pdf file (from Fox5 News Atlanta)
I’ll bet dollars to doughnuts that the judge in Fulton won’t allow any of that evidence to be introduced in this trial either, even though it’s key evidence against a great many claims in the indictment.
“Defendant will refrain from attempting to mount a defense based on debunked conspiracy theories...” or some ruling like that, I expect.
Interesting. Thanks for posting.
The media reporting is “the state had 3 recounts. 2 by hand. “
See how they do that? Listen critically. Read the same. Think about what they left out.
3 recounts sounds so thorough. But nothing about verifying anything.
They may have had recounts but what did they count? Whose ballot? Signatures?
Yes, good point.
Had the USSC done its job and heard the cases brought before it over the election, none of this dumpster fire would be going on today.
Who was behind the “broken water pipe” fraud that sent Republican poll workers home while the Democrats continued to “count” votes?
Those cheating dems in GA need to face RICO charges.
The SOS was just dancing to the tune of his honey pot deputy.
And if it were the Democrat affected the courts media and party would have jumped right on it.
BTW didn’t Biden have a team of 9,000 attorneys on call around the country to contest the election?
And Hillary said don’t concede no matter what happens.
I despise these pigs and what they are doing to our country.
Yes, few actually got to a court room.. The courts clearly didn’t want to touch this... so most just refused to hear it.
The establishment and propaganda media of course just lied and stated that courts had ruled no fraud, and that is just not true at all.
Props to your post.
So whatever Trump has to reveal on Monday, probably has some of this that was noted just a month after the election?
And it’s been shelved until Bananatlanta went and opened
that can up 2+ years later..
I have no doubt that they might have “recounted” three times all the ballots including the ones that should have been thrown out.
But recounting the same group of tainted ballots doesn’t address the issue.
Yep. That was the ruling here in AZ when Lake brought her case. The judge said, in effect, “the law says they had to follow a process, not that the process needs to be reasonable or likely to accomplish anything”.
At the very minimum, a court proceeding was warranted for sure. None of them were allowed to be heard. There’s only one reason for that to happen. There was clear fraud, and they didn’t want the fraud to be exposed, period. That includes the Supreme Court as well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.