The media reporting is “the state had 3 recounts. 2 by hand. “
See how they do that? Listen critically. Read the same. Think about what they left out.
3 recounts sounds so thorough. But nothing about verifying anything.
They may have had recounts but what did they count? Whose ballot? Signatures?
Yes, good point.
I have no doubt that they might have “recounted” three times all the ballots including the ones that should have been thrown out.
But recounting the same group of tainted ballots doesn’t address the issue.
Yep. That was the ruling here in AZ when Lake brought her case. The judge said, in effect, “the law says they had to follow a process, not that the process needs to be reasonable or likely to accomplish anything”.
Exactly- if you re-count the same illegal ballots 3 times it does not make the results legal.