Posted on 08/17/2023 10:32:37 AM PDT by deks
Unlawfully, Fulton County courts blocked the case from ever being heard.
"Trump filed a detailed election contest in Georgia, verified under oath with documented sworn testimony, showing over 100,000 illegal votes were included in the 2020 election certification" - lawyer Robert Barnes.
The irregularities cited included, but were not limited to, 8,718 individuals recorded as having died prior to the date the State accepted their vote, at least 305,701 individuals voted who, according to State records, applied for an absentee ballot more than 180 days prior to the Contested Election.
The Petition also cited the fact that Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger had intentionally abandoned Georgia’s statutory and constitutional process for sending, receiving and signature matching absentee ballots and that statistical analysis showed between 38,250 and 45,626 ballots that should have been rejected in the Contested Election were in fact counted.
Furthermore, deliberate misinformation was used to instruct Republican poll watchers and members of the press to leave the Fulton County counting center whereby Republican poll watchers and members of the press left the State Farm Arena (where they had been observing the ballots being processed). Without public transparency, Fulton County Elections Officials continued to process, handle, and transfer many thousands of ballots contrary to the Georgia statutory requirement that the counting be done in public before representatives of the candidates and parties.
And finally, Secretary of State Raffensberger refused on five separate occasions to comply with requests to produce the signatures used to request absentee ballots and to confirm the identities of those individuals requesting such ballots in the contested election is a violation of O.G.C.A. § 21 2 586(a). Failure to comply with any such request by the Secretary of State or an employee of his or her office shall [constitute] a misdemeanor.” O.G.C.A. § 21-2-586(a), but of course neither Raffensberger, nor any employee were ever tried, let alone convicted.
The Petition filed by the Trump campaign and the other Petitioners asserted that election procedures, both on Election Day and during the subsequent recounts were clearly violated and, citing specific on the record incidents, alleged the laws of the State of Georgia governing the conduct of the Contested Election were disregarded, abandoned, ignored, altered, and otherwise violated by Respondents (including Secretary of State Brad Raffensberger and various county election officials), jointly and severally, allowing a sufficient number of illegal votes to be included in the vote tabulations, such that the results of the Contested Election are invalid, and the declaration of the presidential election in favor of Mr. Biden must be enjoined, vacated, and nullified.
Short version: Constitutionally unqualified voters cast Constitutionally unqualified ballots that were Constitutionally unqualified canvassed and counted in far excess of the margin of victory -- indeed, more than 10 times the margin of victory.
It seems criminal charges are warranted.
What are the implications of this for the current charges against Trump?
Yep. Dems and many repubs alike did nothing about it.
Trump’s petition to contest the Georgia election
Full verified .pdf file (from Fox5 News Atlanta)
I’ll bet dollars to doughnuts that the judge in Fulton won’t allow any of that evidence to be introduced in this trial either, even though it’s key evidence against a great many claims in the indictment.
“Defendant will refrain from attempting to mount a defense based on debunked conspiracy theories...” or some ruling like that, I expect.
Interesting. Thanks for posting.
The media reporting is “the state had 3 recounts. 2 by hand. “
See how they do that? Listen critically. Read the same. Think about what they left out.
3 recounts sounds so thorough. But nothing about verifying anything.
They may have had recounts but what did they count? Whose ballot? Signatures?
Yes, good point.
Had the USSC done its job and heard the cases brought before it over the election, none of this dumpster fire would be going on today.
Who was behind the “broken water pipe” fraud that sent Republican poll workers home while the Democrats continued to “count” votes?
Those cheating dems in GA need to face RICO charges.
The SOS was just dancing to the tune of his honey pot deputy.
And if it were the Democrat affected the courts media and party would have jumped right on it.
BTW didn’t Biden have a team of 9,000 attorneys on call around the country to contest the election?
And Hillary said don’t concede no matter what happens.
I despise these pigs and what they are doing to our country.
Yes, few actually got to a court room.. The courts clearly didn’t want to touch this... so most just refused to hear it.
The establishment and propaganda media of course just lied and stated that courts had ruled no fraud, and that is just not true at all.
Props to your post.
So whatever Trump has to reveal on Monday, probably has some of this that was noted just a month after the election?
And it’s been shelved until Bananatlanta went and opened
that can up 2+ years later..
I have no doubt that they might have “recounted” three times all the ballots including the ones that should have been thrown out.
But recounting the same group of tainted ballots doesn’t address the issue.
Yep. That was the ruling here in AZ when Lake brought her case. The judge said, in effect, “the law says they had to follow a process, not that the process needs to be reasonable or likely to accomplish anything”.
At the very minimum, a court proceeding was warranted for sure. None of them were allowed to be heard. There’s only one reason for that to happen. There was clear fraud, and they didn’t want the fraud to be exposed, period. That includes the Supreme Court as well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.