Dems refuse to learn the lesson of political reality....What goes around., comes around..You won’t always be in charge.....
tried to read article ... started to all sound like blah, blah, blah ... lots and lots and lots of words but actually utter twaddle ...
Author is David Brooks. As in ‘crease in the pants’ David Brooks?
Geez. The 1st 2 sentences are so egregiously wrong why read any further? A propaganda piece that Goebbels would give two enthusiastic thumbs up.
>> The Trumpers are reactionary bigots and authoritarians. <<
FU
FROM THE ARTICLE: But if you are a person of color, a woman who values gender equality or an L.G.B.T. person, would you want to go back to 1963? “
FRON ANOTHER RECENT ARTICLE: Healthcare provider drops cancer patient for purely political reasons.
If we support a guy that the swamp accepts, I don’t want the guy. Its simple. That is why its Trump or no one for me. And its why the elect-ability issue is a non starter. Trump would win a fair election. But they will cheat. SO people suggest that they won’t cheat for someone else. Thats crap. I won’t play that game. And frankly if they don’t cheat its proof that I don’t want that guy in office. Trump has great polls right now. He would win right now. I am not compromising with the cheaters.
“I partly agree with this story; but it’s also a monument to elite self-satisfaction.”
Interesting sentence.
“Why is this guy still politically viable, after all he’s done”
I think they meant to say,Why is this guy still politically viable, AFTER ALL WE’VE DONE TO HIM???
We omitted key words from his statements. We’ve even made crap up. We’ve back up all the bogus impeachments,investigations and indictments. All the while ignoring the traitorous biden crime family.
Now we are playing dumb because some of the charges against Hunter might stick.
PS we still don’t care. We still hate Trump, America and the USC.
Nice try but I’m not signing up to just read the rest of the article.
You work for the Times?
Nope, we see it changing in the wrong direction, that will have dire consequences for the human race. We are committed to stop it from going any further, & reversing it back to a normality that is now missing. Because the stupid amongst, which is rapidly expanding, have no clue what they are inviting in, unrestrained evil.
They will not like what they are now seeking. They will have nothing as is being promised, but they will not be happy.
That's guaranteed.
*** “Republicans see a world changing around them uncomfortably fast, and they want it to slow down, maybe even take a step backward. But if you are a person of color, a woman who values gender equality or an L.G.B.T. person, would you want to go back to 1963? I doubt it.”***
Not one person I know wants to go back to 1963. Not one.
We were making great strides in race relations by the 80’s, 90’s, and so forth. Somehow electing a black man to the presidency is where it all started going astray.
Obama was the one to begin to fundamentally transform our country, and it wasn’t from his half black African side, it was from his white Marxist mother’s side. Marxism is the problem here, and that’s what conservatives are upset about.
Donald Trump showed what a lie we all had in our government and the deep state. It was very Marxist.
We would like to get Marxism out of our government, and Mitch McConnell has been only too happy to let it grow.
Donald Trump was getting things moving. We have too many regulations that constrain productivity.
The anti-Trumpers are the problem. I don’t hate them, but I’d like for them to give Trump a chance. They never gave him a fair shake while he was in the presidency, and all because they think Hillary was supposed to win in 2016.
MAGA people must become ungovernable. The left taught us how.
Nah, the Stalinists and Maoists and Hitlerists and Polpotists and Castroists and Kimists and Chavezists are clearly the good guys.
/s
From the article: University of North Carolina political scientist Marc Hetherington gave to my colleague Thomas B. Edsall recently: “Republicans see a world changing around them uncomfortably fast, and they want it to slow down, maybe even take a step backward. But if you are a person of color, a woman who values gender equality or an L.G.B.T. person, would you want to go back to 1963? I doubt it.”
University of North Carolina - Not a distinguished source of thought and reason. The ivory tower is a leftists rabble.
political scientist - A title for a mere propagandist.
Marc Hetherington - a mere paid shill
Republicans see - such divisive language. It's not Republicans who see, it's everyone who sees what these leftists have been doing
world changing around them uncomfortably fast - No, this drive by the globalists toward Communism has been going on for more than a century.
want it to slow down, maybe even take a step backward - No, it's not going forward. The propagandists on the left project their Communist ideals as progressive when they are actually very regressive.
if you are a person of color - The left has been using race to sow division in order for the left to gain more power. A "person of color" with any brain would grasp that the left is using them as pawns in their quest for power.
who values gender equality - The left pushes their lies about gender equality as part of their agenda for more laws that give them power. What rights does a man have that a woman doesn't?
A male “person of color” in 1963 often had a good-paying union job in Chicago, Detroit or Cleveland and could afford to buy a nice house.
When I arrived in Baltimore in 1975, Howard Street was thronged with mainly black women doing their shopping.
We have a sitting POTUS with very clear evidence of taking bribes, of corruption being business as usual. We have a former POTUS, a political rivalry threatened with impeachment the same day he took office, and nonstop corrupt actions taken against him ever since.
The NY Times doesn’t see or feel the seething anger at the Leftists.. I wouldn’t be surprised if some vote for President Trump just to send a loud and clear FU to everything the Left is doing.
“Why is this guy [Trump] still politically viable, after all he’s done?”
Words fail me.
