Skip to comments.
Newsom proposes constitutional amendment to restrict gun rights
foxnews.com ^
| June 8, 2023
| Chris Pandolfo
Posted on 06/08/2023 6:46:47 AM PDT by PROCON
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
1
posted on
06/08/2023 6:46:47 AM PDT
by
PROCON
To: mylife; Joe Brower; MaxMax; Randy Larsen; waterhill; Envisioning; AZ .44 MAG; umgud; ...
RKBA Ping List
This Ping List is for all news pertaining to infringes upon or victories for the 2nd Amendment.
FReepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from this Ping List.
More 2nd Amendment related articles on FR's Bang List.
2
posted on
06/08/2023 6:47:14 AM PDT
by
PROCON
(Sic Semper Tyrannis)
To: PROCON
Channeling his inner Trudeau.
3
posted on
06/08/2023 6:47:55 AM PDT
by
IllumiNaughtyByNature
(The kernel of our firm's job is to go with lots. - tnlibertarian job offer letter)
To: PROCON
The 2nd Amendment does not “...establish(es) a right to bear firearms for personal self-defense. “
It recognizes the natural right to self defense. A right that predates the concept of government itself.
4
posted on
06/08/2023 6:49:43 AM PDT
by
wny
To: PROCON
DOA...........................
5
posted on
06/08/2023 6:51:28 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
To: IllumiNaughtyByNature
Channeling his inner Adolf.......................
6
posted on
06/08/2023 6:51:51 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
To: PROCON
it would raise the federal minimum age to purchase a firearm from 18 to 21; mandate universal background checks to purchase firearms; institute a waiting period for all gun purchases; and ban "assault weapons.
Raising the age -- Federal courts have ruled against that.
Background checks -- that system has been in law for decades and has failed many times. It doesn't work.
These are band-aids that do not address the REAL issues: mental health and criminals/gangs.
7
posted on
06/08/2023 6:52:42 AM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: PROCON
Makes sense this would come from California, for several reasons.
Doesn't a Constitutional Amendment require a two-thirds vote of the States to become law?
I wonder if the Left will try the same sorts of stunts they tried to get the ERA into the Constitution this time. I expect they'll try them, and a lot more, including federal prosecutions against — and removal of — governors that don't go along.
8
posted on
06/08/2023 6:53:44 AM PDT
by
Steely Tom
([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
To: PROCON
Oh, and bringing new States into the Union in order to tip the vote their way.
9
posted on
06/08/2023 6:54:53 AM PDT
by
Steely Tom
([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
To: PROCON
10
posted on
06/08/2023 6:55:30 AM PDT
by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
To: PROCON
He has as much chance of getting 38 states to ratify this as I do of building my own rocket ship in the backyard out of balsa wood and blasting off to Mars.
11
posted on
06/08/2023 6:55:43 AM PDT
by
Deo volente
("When we see the image of a baby in the womb, we glimpse the majesty of God's creation." Pres. Trump)
To: Steely Tom
An amendment must be ratified by 3/4 of the states.
To: Steely Tom
“ Doesn’t a Constitutional Amendment require a two-thirds vote of the States to become law?”
No.
3/4. 38 states must ratify.
13
posted on
06/08/2023 6:56:49 AM PDT
by
Jim Noble
(Make the GOP illegal - everything else will follow)
To: PROCON
14
posted on
06/08/2023 6:57:38 AM PDT
by
Rurudyne
(Standup Philosopher)
To: Steely Tom
Requires 3/4ths of the states to ratify. That’s 38 states. Forget it.
15
posted on
06/08/2023 6:58:56 AM PDT
by
Deo volente
("When we see the image of a baby in the womb, we glimpse the majesty of God's creation." Pres. Trump)
To: PROCON
Hey, Newsome- MOLON LAVE…
16
posted on
06/08/2023 7:00:08 AM PDT
by
telescope115
(I NEED MY SPACE!!! 🔭)
To: wny
Newsom and his ilk are precisely why our Founding Fathers wrote the Second Amendment as they did.
Molon Labe.
17
posted on
06/08/2023 7:00:09 AM PDT
by
Howie66
(Let's Go Brandon!!)
To: PROCON
The proposed amendment is DOA, but it is constructive that Newsom is proposing using the correct process, and not bloviating about packing the Supreme Court.
18
posted on
06/08/2023 7:01:02 AM PDT
by
devere
To: Deo volente; Jim Noble; Dilbert San Diego
Thanks for the correction.
19
posted on
06/08/2023 7:01:11 AM PDT
by
Steely Tom
([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
To: PROCON
Tell Gavin Nobrain we already have a Constitutional Amendment about gun rights.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson