Is the pentagon run by a cult?
This is crazy.
We have to support our NATO ally…
Oh, Ukraine isn’t in NATO… **** em.
“The Pentagon has given its tacit endorsement of Ukrainian attacks inside Russian territory and no longer fears such operations could lead to a “dramatic” Russian escalation, The Times reported on Friday, citing unnamed US defense officials. The US position appears to only be based on the fact that up to this point, Russia hasn’t responded to attacks on its territory with nuclear weapons or by attacking NATO countries.”
Sounds like something you would read about in a history book about WWIII
The US position appears to only be based on the fact that up to this point, Russia hasn’t responded to attacks on its territory with nuclear weapons or by attacking NATO countries.
—
But they’re hoping if they keep kicking the hornet’s nest enough times they can trigger WW3 and get rid of the surplus population as part of the Great Reset.
Were the situation reversed, and Russian weapons would be allowed on US targets from, say, Mexico, how would we respond militarily?
-—Russia hasn’t responded to attacks on its territory——
..... because it lacks the means to do so.
Except it will be US troops conducting the strikes.
“The Pentagon has given its tacit endorsement of Ukrainian attacks inside Russian territory and no longer fears such operations could lead to a “dramatic” Russian escalation, The Times reported on Friday, citing unnamed US defense officials.”
When you deliberately leak your endorsement for media promulgation, “tacit” it ain’t. I guess the Puppet Group’s calculation is that Russia will nuke Ukraine rather than the US proper. Biden wants to go down in history in the worst way.
“tacit” - in others words, made up.
If this is true, it’s really stupid to be talking about it
... unless, of course, you are looking to provoke WW3
Sometimes a proxy war comes back to haunt you.
In the dis-United States, a proxy war usually comes back to haunt your successor. Politically as well as militarily, especially if you are a Democrat.
USA should only send to Ukraine:
- electrical generating equipment
- medical supplies
- temporary shelter supplies
Immediate Cease Fire
Ukraine keeps the land that it presently holds.
Russia keeps the Crimea.
In addition:
a) Russia maintains Kherson territory east of the Dnieper River that consists of a “shortest route possible land bridge” strip thru Kherson, connecting the Crimea directly to Russia
b) the remaining, presently contested Ukrainian terrority along the border with Russia, that Ukraine has not able to hold, becomes a DE-MILITARIZED ZONE where the Ukraine citizenry can return to, for agricultural activity and support
c) administration and governance of the UKRAINE DE-MILITARIZED ZONE becomes the work of both Ukraine and Russia as neighbors, helping each other to learn how to get along
d) Ukraine does not join NATO
e) Russia surrenders its grip on the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant
f) Russia withdraws from Georgia and from all land that Russia seized from Georgia, since the Russian invasion of 2008.
So when Afghanistan gave Al Qaeda the green light to attack the US, we were wrong in responding?
May Not attack Russia with NATO SUPPLIED WEAPONS, only with Ukrainian built rockets, missiles and drones.
.
It’s not out place to give permission for another country to do anything in a war they are in with another.
It’s not our business and we need to stay out of it.
Israel has a policy that is a third party nation is responsible for an NBC attack on Israel, that nation becomes a legimite target as well as the proxy.
The US is providing weapons under the guise of NATO, however it is the US that is giving the green light to attack Russisa, or possibly Moscow/other cities.
It is my humble opinion, that Putin will not blame NATO but rather the US, and should place the US on notice that proxy nation attacks ok’d by the Biden Admin can be reciprocated.
All the talk of WWIII was on the assumption that Washington expanded the war as such. Now we are seeing that Washington is MAD to the extent that we could see limited Multually Assured Destruction.... Freep’ers will flame me that war with Russia is not likely, or that Russia would be crazy to attack the US.
The US had executed a losing adventure in Eteira against a Russian aligned regime.
The US is pushing hot buttons in Kosovo as we speak... another area that will not be resolved with Russian acceptance.
Biden is attacking Russian Interests in Syria as well.
Washington is pursuing a four front war on Russia.
Putin blaming NATO would simply be expanding the war to Europe. Putin can gain friends and allies at US expense by putting the US on notice rather than blaming/expanding the war into European countries - simply because Washington wants to attack Russia proper.
The US position appears to only be based on the fact that up to this point, Russia hasn’t responded to attacks on its territory with nuclear weapons or by attacking NATO countries.
“Darn it. Now we got to try something else.” is what this says to me.
No, no, NO! Especially not at a time when Putin is talking about changing his nuclear policy. Biden should not have escalated the situation earlier by sending the 101st Airbourne and a squadron of fighters. Now this.