Posted on 10/12/2022 5:57:09 AM PDT by Red Badger
ALEXANDRIA, Virginia — The FBI offered British ex-spy Christopher Steele an “incentive” of up to $1 million if he could prove the allegations in his since-discredited anti-Trump dossier, but the former MI6 agent was unable to back up his claims, according to new court testimony.
The bombshell revelation came during special counsel John Durham’s false statements trial against Steele’s main dossier source, Russian-born lawyer Igor Danchenko, who has been charged with repeatedly lying to the bureau about his sourcing for information he provided for the dossier in 2016. Danchenko has pleaded not guilty.
FBI supervisory intelligence analyst Brian Auten, who interviewed Danchenko in January 2017 as part of the bureau’s Crossfire Hurricane team, was also among the FBI employees who interviewed Steele in early October 2016 in Rome as the FBI sought more details on the dossier. Auten revealed the lucrative reward the bureau had dangled.
DURHAM'S HIGH-STAKES TRIAL OF INFAMOUS ANTI-TRUMP DOSSIER SOURCES GETS UNDERWAY
Durham himself questioned Auten, who was the special counsel team’s first witness in the trial that began with jury selection and opening arguments in a federal courtroom on Tuesday, and he pressed the FBI analyst on whether the FBI offered to provide Steele with any incentives in exchange for information corroborating his dossier’s allegations. Danchenko’s lawyers unsuccessfully objected to the question, overruled by the judge.
“Yes, it did,” Auten said from the witness stand. “Mr. Steele was offered anywhere up to a million dollars” for information “which could help prove the allegations.”
But Auten said, “No,” when asked if Steele ever provided evidence backing up his dossier claims. The FBI analyst also testified Danchenko never provided corroboration for the dossier’s allegations either.
The FBI analyst also testified that other U.S. intelligence agencies looked into the dossier's claims and none could confirm the specific claims in the dossier.
Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz said “both" FBI counterintelligence chief Bill Priestap and now-fired FBI special agent Peter Strzok said an FBI agent who joined Auten in Rome had "provided more information than was necessary to Steele.” Horowitz said his team “determined" that the case agent "did not have prior authorization to make the [classified] disclosure.”
The co-founders of opposition research firm Fusion GPS, which hired Steele to conduct his anti-Trump research, wrote that the October 2016 meeting "yielded an important bit of intelligence for Fusion" about Crossfire Hurricane. Clinton campaign lawyer Marc Elias hired Fusion GPS and met with Steele in 2016. Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook has said Elias passed along to the Clinton campaign Trump-Russia details he learned from Fusion GPS.
Auten circulated a February 2017 intelligence memo to top FBI officials about the Danchenko interview, but Horowitz said it “did not describe the inconsistencies” from the FBI interview in January 2017. The memo was sent to since-fired FBI Director James Comey and since-fired FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe in March 2017.
The FBI soon made Danchenko a paid confidential human source starting in March 2017 through October 2020, Durham's team has stated in court filings.
Auten had also played a role in the bureau’s efforts to obtain flawed surveillance against Trump 2016 campaign associate Carter Page.
Horowitz’s December 2019 report undermined the dossier’s Trump-Russia collusion claims, and the watchdog criticized DOJ and the FBI for at least 17 “significant errors and omissions” related to the FISA warrants against Page and for the bureau's reliance on Steele’s dossier. Horowitz said FBI interviews with Danchenko “raised significant questions about the reliability of the Steele election reporting."
During his questioning of Auten, Durham entered in as evidence an October 2020 LinkedIn message from Danchenko in which the Russian bragged to Anastasia Gnezditskaia, saying, "I collected 80% of the raw intel and half of the analysis for the Chris Steele dossier and went through debriefings with the FBI on the collusion matters."
Auten had been referred by FBI Director Christopher Wray to the Office of Professional Responsibility for potential disciplinary action following the release of Horowitz's 2019 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act abuse report, though Wray said those proceedings were slowed down to cooperate with Durham’s criminal investigation. The disciplinary referral came shortly before Auten’s assessment tied to President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, the next year.
According to Durham, Danchenko anonymously sourced a fabricated claim about Trump 2016 campaign manager Paul Manafort to Charles Dolan, a Clinton ally who spent years, including 2016, doing work for Russian businesses and the Russian government.
Durham's indictment also says Danchenko lied to the FBI about a phone call he claims he received from Sergei Millian, a Belarus-born U.S. citizen and businessman who the Steele source had said told him about a conspiracy of cooperation between former President Donald Trump and the Russians — which the special counsel says is false.
In 2020, Auten separately “opened an assessment which was used by an FBI headquarters team to improperly discredit negative Hunter Biden information as disinformation and caused investigative activity to cease," according to whistleblower allegations made public by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), who claimed one of the allegations shows "verified and verifiable derogatory information on Hunter Biden was falsely labeled as disinformation."
I thought hills paid steel through FGPS to come up with dirt.then hills lawyer told the FBI and then the media ran with it?
That is true.
The FBI offered to pay Steel for ‘proof’.....................
Hillary essentially paid for a kind of “opposition research” which is not unusual.
The FBI was trying to pay for evidence against someone. That seems ... non-standard.
So, the FBiI knew they were paying for fake proof?
Probably happens more often that we care to imagine.................
The FBI was asking the wrong guy. They should’ve been asking Adam Schiff. After all, didn’t he claim he had a mountain of evidence proving Trump’s guilt?
Mitch McConnel was overheard saying incredulously, “only a million?” as if he suggested a higher amount be offered at the time.
Actually they offered him $1 million to fabricate “evidence”.
Steele was a clown. A commie lib clown. Even the so-called FBI fell for his BS.
At least when FBI agents are working on creating “evidence” they aren’t spending time organizing and recruiting to have governors assassinated.< /S>
Birds of a feather........................
How stupid is that...
Do crazy right-wing conspiracy theorists ever get tired of being right?
Pure sophistry......................
“The FBI was trying to pay for evidence against someone. That seems ... non-standard.”
Where does some agent, any agent really, come off with the authority to throw around a $1,000,000.00 to see if a private American citizen paid to have some whore pee on a bed somewhere in Europe?
Who cares! Who cares $1,000,000.000 worth? Are they really this flip with the dollars they’re entrusted with?
The FBI is a disgusting clown show.
We were told over and over by fake news that the allegations against Trump were credible.
I’m still confused. Was the $million offer made in Oct 2016 or in Oct 2021.
If it was made in 2021 then it would appear that the FBI knew of the pending indictments of Sussman and Denchenko were going to be unsealed and wanted to get Steele to verify his dossier before that happened in order to derail Durham’s case/s.
If it was made in 2016 then the FISA application was not only false, but intentionally false in order to get a warrent that was illegal.
The news reports are not clear. One says 2016 and another says 2021.
This is pretty amazing. The FBI doesn’t offer $1 million to anyone, except in marked bills as part of a sting operation (and then not even that much).
The fact that the FBI went forward with warrants for Trump’s team even after Steele failed to provide any supporting evidence is disturbing.
The UK's Deep State just excreted a brick.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.