Posted on 09/29/2022 6:33:36 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Andrew Weissmann, the lead prosecutor for former special counsel Robert Mueller, said Thursday on MSNBC’s “Deadline” that Ginni Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, was a “whack job” who could be in legal peril over her actions surrounding the 2020 presidential election.
Discussing Thomas testifying before the January 6 House Select Committee, Weissmann said, “There’s also sort of her as an exhibit, where I mean, just to put it in your vernacular, she comes off like a whack job. There’s no evidence of the election being stolen. We are a bunch of adults having this conversation, but there’s literally no evidence, and she’s married to a justice on the Supreme Court, where evidence and law is supposed to matter.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
weissmann is very good at cheating
he has been reprimanded several times for withholding disculpatory evidence
should have been disbarred
You don’t even have to believe it in good faith. You can believe it a ridiculous theory and rail against those who have complete faith that it happened. The fervency and sincerity of your statement is not necessary for your 1st Amendment rights to be protected. Unless what you say or write rises to a level of slander, libel, or defamation no laws have been broken.
To a Democrat like Weissmann, it is not that she is married to a Supreme Court justice. It is that she is a race mixer, which Democrats despise, despite their indignant denials. They were the ones passing anti-miscegenation laws, Jim Crow laws, segregation, and were fine with separate but equal facilities.
POS Weissmann should be sued for defamation by Mrs. Thomas.
Weissmann should have been locked up long ago.
Thank you!!
If there was any doubt, any at all, that justice Thomas might lean towards a liberal position, now it is gone.
How in the world is some one calling the wife of a Supreme Court Justice a whackjob?
Only a whackjob nutcase, a mentally challenged lost soul would do that.
I can just see justice Thomas fuming in his office because he can’t sue that person for libel..... at least not until justice Thomas writes the majority decision allowing news organizations to be sued, hehe
For not saying what the corrupt Weissmann wanted her to say?
Weissman ran the whole Meuller inquisition. He’s corrupt as hell, and has zero morals.
He teaches college classes somewhere. !aybe has office hours, or regular class instruction?
Someone, a good Patriot, needs to go pay Weissman a visit. Explain our general disapproval of his actions over the last 30 years.
“Why don’t these thug bastard Feds just admit that they believe that being a Trump voter is punishable by summary execution.”
These are communist tactics. And will expand and get worse until somebody stops them.
Rs are mostly worthless.
Note Rumble videos might take 10 secs to load
Biden extorts Ukraine to fire Hunter's prosecutor "Well, son of a bitch... They fired him."
Andrew Weissmann is not a perry TV hack, The words he uses to describe a AJ of the SC’s wife are a classic example of the Dems and liberals in general in debasing political discoursed by consciously using crude, dehumanizing,vindictive and deliberately malevelent language towards opponents. This has to be deliberate and a seminar driven process. I heard a clip of Rep Raskin trying to minimize the significance of Ray Epps. Not only was he brazenly lying Raskin was deliberately loudly rude and insulting in his language. Enough so that I know 25 years ago he would have been sanctioned by his own party senior members present. The constant use of deliberately dehumanizing and relentlessly insulting language is part of some sort woke narrative to try and silence or provoke a violent response from opponents. In many countries parliaments this sort of language would get the offender a severe beating ( South Korea or Taiwan for instance) or being shot at (Brazil). Is the desire to make the political square a real battlefield?
Lol… these are the same folks that were so concerned about her correspondence with Wisconsin around the election. Yet the Wisconsin SC says she was right to be concerned as the “emergency” voting laws that were implemented have been found to be unconstitutional and illegal. So….is it any wonder why she’d talk to these clowns.
They actually did not have any jurisdiction over the election. Its was and still is a states issue. Until someone sues the state, loses and it’s appealed , scotus was not in play. It’s
THANK GOD, the good people, meaning us among them, have FINALLY LOCATED, FOCUSED ON, AND ACCUSED THAT HORRIBLE HUMAN BEING KNOWN AS ...WEISSMAN.
He MUST BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE!!!
Supposing he was right, and Clarence Thomas’ wife is making an assertion contrary to evidence. So Clarence Thomas should divorce her? He can’t just say, “I’m sorry, dear, but you must give me evidence, not opinion, you little whack job”? Weissman = zealot whack job.
“Whack Job? Look in the mirror jag bag”
My first thought also. We have reached the point in this country where people like this idiot thinks, and usually thinks correctly, that any lie or stupid statement will be grabbed up by the MSM and heralded as profound truth.
According to the FBI there must have been fifteen enemies of democracy orchestrating Jan 6, all separately and coequally, when it was only one organization, the FBI.
:: Weissmann is projecting ::
I well worn type of gas lighting.
And Clarence Thomas will have the last laugh as the “bozo” is dragged in front of a Courts Martial and not SCOTUS.
Why, I do believe that is defamation, sir.
This gas bag needs to be put out, er, into a pasture. How many people did he put out of work with a made up law in the Enron matter? Next up was the Russia Russia Russia fiasco. Yet he is still around. He is a beyond the pale nut job.
I would even call it shopworn but it still seems to work.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.