Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alex Jones’s businesses tap advisers, weigh possible bankruptcy
fortune ^ | April 17, 2022 | BY BLOOMBERG

Posted on 04/17/2022 7:08:30 PM PDT by RandFan

Edited on 04/17/2022 9:38:12 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: RandFan

It doesn’t matter what he disputes. He doesn’t get to decide what compliance with discovery is. The judge does.

Read Tex. R. Civ. P. 215.

Connecticut has a similar rule.

If he’s so sure he was wronged, he can appeal. I’m sure he’ll have just as much success there.


41 posted on 04/17/2022 8:03:07 PM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Roadrunner383

So a judge anywhere in the US can issue a judgement and bankrupt anyone they want.

What a system...

As for your claims you are aware he has been deposed?


42 posted on 04/17/2022 8:03:38 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Couldn’t happen to a nicer guy.


43 posted on 04/17/2022 8:04:25 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30
He went past the claim about Sandy Hook and went to slander, when he basically said that the families were in on the act of the murder of their children.

If he kept his position to questioning whether it was a false flag, he might not have been able to sue.

So, the theory is that the Sandy Hook families were slandered because, due to circumstances in the news at that time, Alex Jones believed Sandy Hook was a fraud, but Richard Jewell was wrongly convicted by the Lame stream Media and the FBI in the court of public opinion, being falsely accused and harassed to death for the Olympic Park bombing, yet the guilty media was exonerated in court after Richard Jewell's death.

Every time I see that "Sandy Hook Promise" lady's commercial, I have an urge to shut her mouth for her.   Every mother should profit from her child's death. /s

44 posted on 04/17/2022 8:05:45 PM PDT by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

https://www.ctpublic.org/news/2022-03-23/alex-jones-misses-deposition-again-hell-be-ordered-to-answer-questions-thursday


45 posted on 04/17/2022 8:06:05 PM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

He says he has complied with everything and these judgments are nefarious and counter to justice


46 posted on 04/17/2022 8:06:38 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

He made it and was deposed


47 posted on 04/17/2022 8:07:22 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

He did indeed provide it. They demand a financial breakdown on how much income resulted from the Sandy Hook discussion. They say no such accounting exists and isn’t possible. That would be like asking Fox to explain which unique news stories on Tucker got income for My Pillow. Not which program, which topics.


48 posted on 04/17/2022 8:08:10 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

He only sat for the deposition last week.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10722987/Alex-Jones-Sandy-Hook-Lawsuit-Hes-getting-75-000-paid-fines-Connecticut-court.html

This deposition has nothing to do with liability, it’s all about damages.


49 posted on 04/17/2022 8:08:44 PM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Roadrunner383

He showed for depositions. The democrat judge demanded records that do not and cannot exist without a bizarre accounting process.
Grab any newspaper. How much did a specific editorial or letter to the editor generate in income? And proof is required.


50 posted on 04/17/2022 8:11:38 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

The judges ruling took place in open court.

If Jones and his attorneys had video or audio of the depositions, and they definitely would if Jones had showed up, they would have have slapped the tapes down on the bench in front of the judge, in open court. They would have said the attorneys for the plaintiffs have committed perjury. They would have released the videos to the media to show the plaintiffs were lying. Jones would have broacast the depositions on his own show and provided dates and times. It would have been easy to prove he had cooperated.


51 posted on 04/17/2022 8:12:16 PM PDT by Roadrunner383 (;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

So?

He’s been deposed and provided thousands of documents what more do they want....

He is a journalist and broadcaster and questioning events is not illegal


52 posted on 04/17/2022 8:13:18 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

It doesn’t matter what he says.

The CT Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court already denied one of his appeals.

The Texas Supreme Court and the Texas Court of Appeals also rejected previous appeals in his cases.

But let me guess, all of these courts are part of the conspiracy right? Including the Texas Supreme Court, which is one of the most conservative in the country?


53 posted on 04/17/2022 8:15:11 PM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020
I mean, ask yourself how you would feel if your Kindergarten-aged child...

Good grief.   Feelings should not apply.   It's lunacy.

54 posted on 04/17/2022 8:15:32 PM PDT by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Roadrunner383

He’s been deposed in Connecticut but told them he does not want the video released (I believe)


55 posted on 04/17/2022 8:15:53 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

“Alex did more than question. What he said was outrageous. “

Then maybe you could post the video. We would all love to see it. Of his saying it was a false flag and the families were in on it. I saw him question a lot of odd things in the news, like a father laughing on video just before he gave a media statement.

You must be able to locate it? Right?


56 posted on 04/17/2022 8:16:14 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Alex Jones wouldn’t be in this position if he hadn’t made poor choices. Actions have consequences.


57 posted on 04/17/2022 8:16:15 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

It’s ongoing litigation these things take time and there can be many appeals.


58 posted on 04/17/2022 8:17:38 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

“Jim Robinson banned his content for years, and I can understand why.”

He allows his content now, and I understand why.


59 posted on 04/17/2022 8:19:10 PM PDT by DesertRhino (Dogs are called man's best friend. Moslems hate dogs. Add it up..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

To me it sounds like an agenda to shut him down even here on FR...


60 posted on 04/17/2022 8:19:39 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson