Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alex Jones’s businesses tap advisers, weigh possible bankruptcy
fortune ^ | April 17, 2022 | BY BLOOMBERG

Posted on 04/17/2022 7:08:30 PM PDT by RandFan

Edited on 04/17/2022 9:38:12 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: RandFan

By these rules, Trump should get control of NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN and others who destroyed his Presidency based on fabrications and lies.


61 posted on 04/17/2022 8:21:36 PM PDT by ground_fog ( My God this was from today!S)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: RandFan
He is a journalist and broadcaster and questioning events is not illegal

This isn’t about “illegality.” Journalists and broadcasters don’t have cart blanc authority to commit slander and libel. It’s pretty hard to get a judgment against one due to NY Times v. Sullivan. The fact the clown Jones wouldn’t comply with discovery is pretty telling.

You clearly don’t understand how the law works. Jones was never deposed on liability. Hence the default judgments. The deposition that he finally sat for, after accruing thousands in fines is solely about damages at this stage.

You can be angry about it if you want, but it won’t change the outcome. If he has all this evidence that he’s being persecuted without cause, the CT and TX Supreme Court would be glad to hear it on appeal.

Let me know how that works out for him. Lol.

62 posted on 04/17/2022 8:21:48 PM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

I noticed all of the interviews of grieving parents and crisis actors are nowhere to be found on you tube anymore. Wonder why.


63 posted on 04/17/2022 8:22:47 PM PDT by gawatchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RandFan
It’s ongoing litigation these things take time and there can be many appeals.

Then it will all be sorted out, so why are you whining?

64 posted on 04/17/2022 8:26:44 PM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

He says he has complied with discovery and has provided thousands and thousands of documents to the court.

This is a narrow legal argument and the judge could be acting inappropriately.


65 posted on 04/17/2022 8:27:14 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: RandFan
He says he has complied with discovery and has provided thousands and thousands of documents to the court.

Then he has nothing to worry about and he can prevail on appeal. Right? Lol.

The early deposition that Jones gave in one case was an absolute disaster for him. I can see why he tried the non-compliance route after that. But hey, if you and he think he did everything that he needed to, and two separate courts are just out to get him, then let’s see what the CT and TX Supreme Courts do.

I bet he still loses and it won’t be because of lizard men or conspiracy.

66 posted on 04/17/2022 8:32:23 PM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

I’m whining because there appears to be an agenda.

So you’re not allowed to question certain events like Smollett or the Syrian gas attack, WMDs, etc. These are all events Alex has questioned in his career (some he got right...)

Sad state of affairs especially for journalism


67 posted on 04/17/2022 8:32:43 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

This appears to be correct there is no way they will give him a win by dismissing the case.

And the longer it goes on the more his name is dragged through the mud.

Alex Jones becomes known as the Sandy Hook conspiracy theorist when it was only a very small part of the news he was covering at the time and even half the Internet were also speculating about it no matter how crass.


68 posted on 04/17/2022 8:41:48 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

You absolutely can “question certain events.” There is a difference between questioning an official narrative and defamation.


69 posted on 04/17/2022 8:43:17 PM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

Again he is disputing the defamation arguments he is never mentioned any of the parents by their names so it comes down to a narrow legal argument or definition.

This is going to be a very complicated case especially if they allow Alex to present his arguments.


70 posted on 04/17/2022 8:46:22 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: higgmeister

Yes, that’s what it amounts to, “feelings.” Sorry, but this country has never just dismissed every libel/slander lawsuit by just saying “boo hoo, they hurt your feelings, get over it.”


71 posted on 04/17/2022 9:06:04 PM PDT by Trump20162020
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

I never saw him say anything. He said it on his Infowars radio show

He refused to provide the court with asked for documents and information. Hence the default judgement

Your logic is skewed. No one has to prove Alex is psychotic. He admired it under oath during a deposition. No I won’t provide it to you. Use whatever search engine you want. Do your own research


72 posted on 04/17/2022 9:11:49 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Nifster; DesertRhino

Every single point you’ve made has been refuted or disputed by the man himself.

A lot of it is hearsay or media nonsense


73 posted on 04/17/2022 9:19:01 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

I saw the video the day of the “shooting” It was the strangest school shooting video I ever saw.


74 posted on 04/17/2022 9:26:19 PM PDT by roving
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: roving

I saw videos that implied that it was a government operation and I don’t question that there are individuals evil enough to kill innocents in order to push an agenda, but I wouldn’t go as far to claim that the families themselves were in on it.


75 posted on 04/17/2022 9:31:05 PM PDT by Jonty30 (Ask a liberal if they hav do they just collect them from lives they destroy. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Not in court. He lost by not responding


76 posted on 04/17/2022 9:31:09 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

For those of you with short memories, Alex Jones was the FIRST, numero uno, to be attacked, deplatformed, cancelled, dropped by every social media platform. They did everything to him except shoot him.

I don’t remember all the details, but I watched Infowars at that time and Alex brought up some very interesting oddities about Sandy Hook.

I don’t recall him saying the things people here are accusing him of. Maybe he did?

WHERE IS THE VIDEO? His program is broadcast “worldwide” on the Internet.

Instead of just attacking him, with no evidence, maybe y’all should look it up.


77 posted on 04/18/2022 12:23:04 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

The left will use this option to get rid of any conservative talk show host.. Sue Sue Sue till you’re out of business..


78 posted on 04/18/2022 12:27:45 AM PDT by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tallyhoe

This is my concern as well.

As another poster said they started with Alex Jones with all the cancel culture stuff years ago...


79 posted on 04/18/2022 4:33:01 AM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

and he also has influenced and done more in the way of exposing corruption than the rest of us could do in 10 lifetimes.


80 posted on 04/18/2022 7:25:56 AM PDT by Manuel OKelley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson