Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alex Jones’s businesses tap advisers, weigh possible bankruptcy
fortune ^ | April 17, 2022 | BY BLOOMBERG

Posted on 04/17/2022 7:08:30 PM PDT by RandFan

Edited on 04/17/2022 9:38:12 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]


(Excerpt) Read more at fortune.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2minutehate; alexjones; alexjonesfan; bloomberg; cantpostbloimberg; cantpostbloomberg; carryingtheleftsh20; censorship; corporatemedia; corruptmedia; cowardlyrinobackstab; drivebymedia; enemedia; fakenews; fallingforpropaganda; freespeech; infowars; judicialtyranny; lamestreammedia; lawfare; learnhowtopost; leftwingmedia; leftwingmediabias; letsgoalexjones; loserinocirclejerk; mainstreammedia; marxism; mediabias; nazis; onesidedreport; republicanwildcat; rinosbetrayamerica; rinosuckupthread; sandyhook; texas; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
So you're not allowed to question certain events like Jussie Smollett or WMDs etc?

What happened to the First Amendment?

Also no jury either... What happened to that?

1 posted on 04/17/2022 7:08:30 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Welcome to Post-Constitutional America.


2 posted on 04/17/2022 7:13:57 PM PDT by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

He went past the claim about Sandy Hook and went to slander, when he basically said that the families were in on the act of the murder of their children.

If he kept his position to questioning whether it was a false flag, he might not have been able to sue.


3 posted on 04/17/2022 7:16:29 PM PDT by Jonty30 (Ask a liberal if they hav do they just collect them from lives they destroy. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

Have you got video or evidence of that?


4 posted on 04/17/2022 7:17:49 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

It’s one thing to question. It’s quite another to slander.


5 posted on 04/17/2022 7:18:27 PM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

What about a conviction by a jury of your peers I thought that was in the U.S. constitution


6 posted on 04/17/2022 7:21:34 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

It was a civil case not criminal.

Alex did more than question. What he said was outrageous. He did it to himself. Stupid should hurt


7 posted on 04/17/2022 7:22:05 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Are you delusional?


8 posted on 04/17/2022 7:22:59 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

He eventually admitted in a deposition that the event was real. Two courts found him guilty.

https://www.the-sun.com/news/3774184/what-did-alex-jones-say-sandy-hook-shooting/


9 posted on 04/17/2022 7:24:54 PM PDT by Jonty30 (Ask a liberal if they hav do they just collect them from lives they destroy. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

So judges in the US are allowed to bankrupt anyone with default judgments and no jury ?

Why is this allowed?


10 posted on 04/17/2022 7:26:03 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

He should have kept his position to it being a real event, because children did die, and question whether or not the assailants may have been agents of the government.


11 posted on 04/17/2022 7:26:13 PM PDT by Jonty30 (Ask a liberal if they hav do they just collect them from lives they destroy. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Because your system allows $100 million settlements.


12 posted on 04/17/2022 7:26:40 PM PDT by Jonty30 (Ask a liberal if they hav do they just collect them from lives they destroy. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Very sad, but it is a risk one runs in his niche.

Being strategic matters. Taking the wrong strategy…


13 posted on 04/17/2022 7:27:24 PM PDT by EBH (Hold My Beer. 1776-2021 May God Save Us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan
So you're not allowed to question certain events like Jussie Smollett or WMDs etc? What happened to the First Amendment? Also no jury either... What happened to that?

Seriously? That's your attempt to defend what he did?

14 posted on 04/17/2022 7:28:41 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

How many episodes did he talk about this?


15 posted on 04/17/2022 7:31:13 PM PDT by TakebackGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

In the US there are things like jury trials and free speech


16 posted on 04/17/2022 7:31:37 PM PDT by RandFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

A default judgement comes from not responding. Alex lost because he had no defense.

Use he way back machine if you need to. Infowars carried pictures of people he claimed were crisis actors and that the Sandy Hook killings were a fals flag and that the parents grieving were phonies. He ranted about it often. It was disgusting. It’s when I quit listening to him


17 posted on 04/17/2022 7:33:36 PM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Yes, but this wasn’t an issue of free speech. And I think you probably know that.

Nor was it an issue of a jury trial. When you refuse to comply with discovery you risk default judgment. And I think you probably know that as well.


18 posted on 04/17/2022 7:34:54 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Alex Jones’ problems are due to Alex Jones.

He’s an arrogant conspiracy theorist and precisely the sort of belligerent weirdo conservatives don’t need. He provides little to no original content other than hosing and commentary on other people’s reporting. In this particular case he went off on his own tangent, causing real harm (a tort) to the families, and is now paying the price as adjudicated in a court of law. He’s not cutting edge or avant garde, he’s schlocky and manic.

Jim Robinson banned his content for years, and I can understand why.


19 posted on 04/17/2022 7:36:12 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandFan

Now do bankrupt New York Times, the Washington Post, CBS, NBC, PBS, ABC, CNN, AP.

They are causing their readers and listeners to burn down cities and do terrorist attacks.

Alex Jones caused his readers to do some prank phone calls.


20 posted on 04/17/2022 7:36:17 PM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson