Posted on 03/24/2022 3:34:46 AM PDT by where's_the_Outrage?
Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson fully disqualified herself from serving on the Supreme Court with one single, yet glaring claim she made during her hearing, radio host Dan Bongino said Wednesday.
On "The Dan Bongino Show", Bongino said that in terms of this claim, the Biden-nominated jurist is either "ignorant or a liar."
According to Bongino, Jackson disqualified herself when she claimed not to be able to define what a woman is.
During Tuesday's confirmation hearing, Sen. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., cited a decision from another liberal justice, the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who wrote in U.S. v. Virginia that "supposed inherent differences are no longer accepted as a ground for race or national origin classifications, physical differences between men and women, however, are enduring."
Turning to Jackson, the Tennessean asked if she agreed with Ginsburg that sexes are not "fungible" and asked her for a definition.
Jackson said she couldn't provide a definition for the word "woman" and argued it was because she was not a biologist.
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
We need to contact the Congress critters about this woman. Let’s remind them that it’s an election year and we will remember how they vote.
They DON’T CARE how we vote! That is the whole, entire problem!!
When it comes to Democrat Presidential nominees to the SC, why go through the kabuki theatre of Senate hearing? Just nominate a robot. The Dem appointees are a very cohesive political bunch that have never in the past 60 years gone astray and ruled against marquee Democrat legislative or policy issues. You will never find a Souter, Warren, Stevens, Kennedy, Roberts or O’Connor and a host of other Republican justices that went liberal or maintained a moderate strain among them. Law has little to do with Dem appointed SC justices. Just program the robot to follow Kagan or Sotomayer’s lead. And you don’t even have to pay it. Paint it black or brown if you want to play the diversity game.
ALL the Pstupid and evil Democrats WILL vote for her!
Oh that’s cute!
Anyone who can’t define a basic fact of life is not qualified to be a judge of our laws.
This indicates that she does not respect the truth, but is willing to follow the crowd and the ways of the liberal progressive world.
Wake Up America! They are trying to destroy reason and logic.
They’ll care when they see the election changes being made in many of the states. Dominion won’t save their silly arses this next go round, and that includes Rinos as well.
Not to worry, plenty of republicans will vote to confirm her,
I think the biological definition is “adult human organism, whose biology is built for producing large gametes”.
It might not be the best definition, but that’s what I can do without looking it up.
Where I am unsure is that I remember from school that girls are born already having all their egg-cells, but men constantly produce new sperm so even if they ruin their sperm by drinking then it takes 4 months of sobriety to have new sperm never touched by alcohol.
“Anyone who can’t define a basic fact of life is not qualified to be a judge of our laws.”
That was a trick question that she did not answer properly. A substantial political faction thinks someone is a woman if that person says she’s a woman. Other think it’s biological.
Ketanji couldn’t take political sides on this one, but her “I’m not a biologist” was ridiculous.
She just proved that science determines gender.
It’s not that simple in some cases. There are cases where genetics malfunction and result in bizarre situations..such as females who look like females..respond like females..but have a Y chromosome.
Although her answer might have been more geared to the woke crowd.
.....my predictionm, for what it is worth: Romney, Collins and Murkowski will also vote for her....sad to say... I do not see any Democrats NOT voting for her, including Manchin and Sinema..they will toe the party line......
After reading through the transcript of the oral arguments in the OSHA vaccine mandate case a few months ago, I determined that U.S. Supreme Court justices are some of the dumbest, most uninformed people on the planet.
This Kenny Michael Jackson nitwit might actually make the place smarter.
Then what are the people who can give birth naturally but are genetically male because they have a Y chromosome
https://novonordiskfonden.dk/en/news/more-women-than-expected-are-genetically-men/
IIRC, she has said that woman should have the right to abort their babies. But she doesn’t know what women are.
Guys. She’s getting in.
Betcha she doesn’t know what “fungible” means.
I think this is the reason why the definition that I tried to paraphrase refers to gametes and not chromosomes.
Like the article says “they have a womb, so with appropriate hormone treatment and fertilized egg implantation they can actually become pregnant and give birth”.
So they don’t actually have egg cells of their own, but it certainly is trickier because they do have a womb.
I think these people have had an accident at birth and are not at fault.
On the other hand the a-hole activists largely don’t have had such accident and are just bullshitting.
I don’t know what is right here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.