Posted on 02/03/2022 6:16:52 PM PST by delta7
Although vaccination is recognized as the cause of death by doctors and the insurance company, it has refused to pay out. The reason is because the side effects of the Corona jabs are known and published. They argue that the deceased took part in an experiment at his own risk. Covid-19 in itself is not classed as a “critical illness”.
According to the company, an experimental vaccination resulting in death is like suicide
The insurance company justified the refusal of payment to the family by stating that the use of experimental medication or treatments, including Corona injections, is expressly excluded from the insurance contract. The family’s subsequent lawsuit against the insurance company has been unsuccessful.
The court allegedly justified its ruling as follows: “The side effects of the experimental vaccine are published and the deceased could not claim to have known nothing about it when he voluntarily took the vaccine. There is no law or mandate in France that compelled him to be vaccinated. Hence his death is essentially suicide.” Since suicide is not covered by the policy from the outset, the insurance refuses to budge.
Scandalous verdict: taking a fatal risk is legally suicide
“The court recognizes the classification of the insurer who, in view of the announced side effects, including death, legally regards participation in the phase three experiment, whose proven harmlessness is not given, as voluntarily taking a fatal risk that is not covered by the contract and legally recognized as suicide. The family has appealed. However, the insurer’s defense is recognized as well-founded and contractually justified, as this publicly known fatal risk is legally considered suicide, since the customer has been notified and has agreed to voluntarily take the risk of death without being obliged or compelled to do so.”
No surprise: Mainstream media is silent
This case has not yet been reported in France ‘s mainstream media. The case was published by the family’s lawyer, Carlo Alberto Brusa, on social media. Unfortunately, no sources or court records are given, which is why the authenticity of the report cannot currently be verified although there have been other warnings regarding the risk associated with the jabs recognized by insurers. In the US, the American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI) has denied reports of non-payment.
Censorship
In recent months, many French anti-vaccine groups of the social network Facebook have been victims of sudden, unjustified closures, especially support groups for Brusa and Professor Didier Raoult. The latter has often been criticized for his positions on vaccines, hydroxychloroquine and his criticism of the mismanagement of the epidemic by the Macron government.
At the end of last year, the main support group for Didier Raoult was deactivated before it was reactivated, thanks to a mobilization on social networks and a massive relay on alternative media. On November 27, a teacher support group for Brusa was suspended. With no less than 310 000 members to its credit, the group created in March 2020 was closed for having shared the complaint by Brusa concerning the wearing of masks for children. The Parisian lawyer and his association Réaction-19 was accused of spreading a “conspiracy”.
Global difficulties for insurers due to vaccines
Actuaries have been warning that rising claims will be eroding the capital which insurers set aside to avoid insolvency. Notably, older people do not take out life insurance, which means that the claims have been from younger clients. Insurers say that they expect a rise in excess deaths.
According to Alex Berenson, the risk of injury or death from the jab is exceptionally high judging from Canadian data.
The refusal to pay for a vaccine-related death may not be surprising since globally the life insurance industry has been hit with reported claims of $5,5 billion in the first nine months of 2021 versus $3,5 billion for the whole of 2020, according to insurance broker Howden.
Dutch insurer Aegon, with two-thirds of its business in the US, said its American claims in the third quarter were $111 million, up from $31 million a year earlier.
Vaccine deaths may force insurers to raise premiums and some have indicated that they intend to punish the unvaccinated for their financial woes.
“My Facebook group has a whistleblower’s sister who said this whole thing is going to finally blow up”……..
so you’re saying we need new conspiracy theories because our old ones came true?
Of course it doesn't!!! Get you policies out and read the suicide clause which will tell you once the policy has been inforce for two years (24 months) it is incontestable for ANY REASON, INCLUDING SUICIDE!!!
Incontestable means the claim will be paid as long as all premiums are paid in full for two full years and NO LEGAL CHALLENGE CAN BE MADE BY THE INSURER!
I am surprised and disappointed that any FReeper would post or promote such an absurd notion on this site. I'm sure most FReepers have a lot more sense than to succumb to such a temptation for sensationalism and nothing else!!!
Ping!!!
Who is your carrier? Seems your post verifies, at least in part the thread
Fake news
Yes, it is a fake story. We can know it’s 100% fake because the lawyer
mentioned in this story, who is a prominent vaccine choice advocate in France, has said that he and his firm are not involved in any such case, he doesn’t know about it, and it’s not real. That and there was no such case before the courts.
There are other clues to it being fake. In France, life insurers have to pay out even if the vaccine is experimental (same in Belgium, this story has many forms so sometimes it’s in France, sometimes Belgium). There are no vaccine exclusions in life insurance contracts in France.
The supposed court judgement, which does not read like an actual court judgement, also equates taking a (experimental) vaccine to suicide and since suicide isn’t covered the claim is denied. Except suicide is covered after one year. If it had been a recent contract, the supposed judgement would have said it was a timing issue. It couldn’t have been a recent contract, though, because most of the stories say he was an old man long retired who would not have been issued a multimillion euro insurance contract within a year of his death.
CNN? NYT?
The decision that the vaccines were safe was a political one, not one based on evidence or on medicine. Insurance is based on reality. Insurance companies work very hard to understand the real risk and, because profit is involved, politics is not a factor.
Boy - that is sure prophetic.
I’m a consultant. I have had to turn down work for working on state and county projects. I’ll need to look into Federal projects when the time comes.
But - yeah, so far I have been able to turn down those jobs and still feed my family.
The other option is to move to another state. (Which my wife wants to do.)
But I read it on the interweb.
It’s almost certainly fake news — or at least has nothing to do with experimental COVID vaccines.
————
Often today, what is now branded fake news often becomes reality. As the vax injuries sky rocket, insurance companies will soon ( are) rewriting their policy disclaimers. It is all about money.
An insurance company can rewrite and update its policy disclaimers, but that would only affect new policies. They can’t turn around and deny a claim based on a disclaimer that was established after the policy was in force and the premium paid.
I found your post at two removes from a link on another thread.
I realize it's six weeks later; and the whole world is taken up with the Ukraine and everything... but would you happen to have a link showing what you just said?
Your later arguments are powerful but lack the "punch in the gut" factor of this first one; it'd be nice to have something concrete to point to.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.