Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Life insurer refuses to cover vaccine death
Free West Media ^ | Jan 14 2022 | Free West Media

Posted on 02/03/2022 6:16:52 PM PST by delta7

Although vaccination is recognized as the cause of death by doctors and the insurance company, it has refused to pay out. The reason is because the side effects of the Corona jabs are known and published. They argue that the deceased took part in an experiment at his own risk. Covid-19 in itself is not classed as a “critical illness”.

According to the company, an experimental vaccination resulting in death is like suicide

The insurance company justified the refusal of payment to the family by stating that the use of experimental medication or treatments, including Corona injections, is expressly excluded from the insurance contract. The family’s subsequent lawsuit against the insurance company has been unsuccessful.

The court allegedly justified its ruling as follows: “The side effects of the experimental vaccine are published and the deceased could not claim to have known nothing about it when he voluntarily took the vaccine. There is no law or mandate in France that compelled him to be vaccinated. Hence his death is essentially suicide.” Since suicide is not covered by the policy from the outset, the insurance refuses to budge.

Scandalous verdict: taking a fatal risk is legally suicide

“The court recognizes the classification of the insurer who, in view of the announced side effects, including death, legally regards participation in the phase three experiment, whose proven harmlessness is not given, as voluntarily taking a fatal risk that is not covered by the contract and legally recognized as suicide. The family has appealed. However, the insurer’s defense is recognized as well-founded and contractually justified, as this publicly known fatal risk is legally considered suicide, since the customer has been notified and has agreed to voluntarily take the risk of death without being obliged or compelled to do so.”

No surprise: Mainstream media is silent

This case has not yet been reported in France ‘s mainstream media. The case was published by the family’s lawyer, Carlo Alberto Brusa, on social media. Unfortunately, no sources or court records are given, which is why the authenticity of the report cannot currently be verified although there have been other warnings regarding the risk associated with the jabs recognized by insurers. In the US, the American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI) has denied reports of non-payment.

Censorship

In recent months, many French anti-vaccine groups of the social network Facebook have been victims of sudden, unjustified closures, especially support groups for Brusa and Professor Didier Raoult. The latter has often been criticized for his positions on vaccines, hydroxychloroquine and his criticism of the mismanagement of the epidemic by the Macron government.

At the end of last year, the main support group for Didier Raoult was deactivated before it was reactivated, thanks to a mobilization on social networks and a massive relay on alternative media. On November 27, a teacher support group for Brusa was suspended. With no less than 310 000 members to its credit, the group created in March 2020 was closed for having shared the complaint by Brusa concerning the wearing of masks for children. The Parisian lawyer and his association Réaction-19 was accused of spreading a “conspiracy”.

Global difficulties for insurers due to vaccines

Actuaries have been warning that rising claims will be eroding the capital which insurers set aside to avoid insolvency. Notably, older people do not take out life insurance, which means that the claims have been from younger clients. Insurers say that they expect a rise in excess deaths.

According to Alex Berenson, the risk of injury or death from the jab is exceptionally high judging from Canadian data.

The refusal to pay for a vaccine-related death may not be surprising since globally the life insurance industry has been hit with reported claims of $5,5 billion in the first nine months of 2021 versus $3,5 billion for the whole of 2020, according to insurance broker Howden.

Dutch insurer Aegon, with two-thirds of its business in the US, said its American claims in the third quarter were $111 million, up from $31 million a year earlier.

Vaccine deaths may force insurers to raise premiums and some have indicated that they intend to punish the unvaccinated for their financial woes.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antivaxxcult; antivaxxerlies; bidenvoters; covax; dumbingdownfr; fakewestmedia; gethelp; ifitsontheinternet; itmustbetrue; neverhappened; notanewsarticle; notanewssite; pleasegethelp; reallyoldnews; recycledfakenews; seekhelpnow; vaccines; whyisthisinnews; whypostthiscrap
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
Coming to an insurance company near you. It’s about time.
1 posted on 02/03/2022 6:16:52 PM PST by delta7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: delta7

All of us who were saying because it was experimental and voluntary, referred to the insurance people who warned this would occur.

We were told we were lying by the vaxholes here.


2 posted on 02/03/2022 6:20:00 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delta7

What’s about time?


3 posted on 02/03/2022 6:21:12 PM PST by GreyHoundSailor (LGBTQ - Let's Get Brandon To Quit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delta7

A French underwriter, oui?


4 posted on 02/03/2022 6:21:54 PM PST by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delta7

I’m a little suspicious that this article doesn’t give the name of the insurance company. Not to say it didn’t happen, but...


5 posted on 02/03/2022 6:23:07 PM PST by 21twelve (Ever Vigilant. Never Fearful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delta7

“Unfortunately, no sources or court records are given, which is why the authenticity of the report cannot currently be verified…”

Court cases are among the easiest things to verify. The fact that none is forthcoming is extraordinarily suspect.

If it is only being reported on social media, it should be deemed a lie until shown otherwise.


6 posted on 02/03/2022 6:24:56 PM PST by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Mandating employers are about to receive a big increase in lawsuits, I think. They have no government mandates to hide behind...


7 posted on 02/03/2022 6:25:06 PM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

They will claim they did, at the time. Before the various courts halted them.


8 posted on 02/03/2022 6:26:06 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: delta7

Yep. There you have it.


9 posted on 02/03/2022 6:27:17 PM PST by Delta 21 (It started as a virus, and mutated into an IQ test.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I’m sorry. This just didn’t happen.

One website quotes this as the “judge’s verdict:”

“The side effects of an experimental vaccine are being made public, and the deceased could not have professed ignorance when voluntarily taking the vaccine. There is no law or regulation in France requiring him to be vaccinated. Therefore, his death is, in fact, a suicide. The Court recognizes the qualification of an insurer who legally regards participation in the third phase experiment, the lack of evidence of which has not been proven, as the voluntary assumption of a fatal risk not covered by the contract, taking into account the declared side effects, including death is covered and legally recognized as suicide. The family filed an appeal. However, the insurer’s defense is recognized as reasonable and contractually justified, since this well-known risk of death is legally considered suicide, the client was notified and agreed to voluntarily risk his life without being forced to do so.“

———-

That’s a write up straight out of qtard land. Real judges don’t write like that.


10 posted on 02/03/2022 6:31:02 PM PST by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: delta7
Unfortunately, no sources or court records are given, which is why the authenticity of the report cannot currently be verified...

Let us know when you have something more than an anti-vax fever dream.

11 posted on 02/03/2022 6:31:28 PM PST by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: delta7

More $ for my kin. We remain “NON GMO”.


12 posted on 02/03/2022 6:31:32 PM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this? 😕)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

There are still going to be enough employers who did it after the USSC ruling and enough victims. I think this is what will break the vax mandates once the first big case win comes in.


13 posted on 02/03/2022 6:32:23 PM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

14 posted on 02/03/2022 6:34:57 PM PST by null and void (81 million votes ≠ 81 million voters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: null and void

15 posted on 02/03/2022 6:37:07 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24
Court cases are among the easiest things to verify. The fact that none is forthcoming is extraordinarily suspect.

Under the Admiralty law based US system, certainly. Can the same be said for Napoleonic law based French jurisprudence? Maybe not so much, no?

16 posted on 02/03/2022 6:38:35 PM PST by null and void (81 million votes ≠ 81 million voters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: null and void

The US court system isn’t based on Admiralty Law. It’s based on common law.

And yes, French court decisions are accessible, even though they don’t follow stare decisis.

https://libguides.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/law-french/cases


17 posted on 02/03/2022 6:42:56 PM PST by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Bkmk


18 posted on 02/03/2022 6:44:38 PM PST by ptsal (Vote R.E.D. >>>Remove Every Democrat ***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24
That’s a write up straight out of qtard land.

How do you figure?

19 posted on 02/03/2022 6:44:43 PM PST by TangoLimaSierra (⭐⭐Public hangings will wake 'em up.⭐⭐)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: delta7

My life insurance company sent me a letter detailing the exclusion of coverage for an experimental vaccination. My wife’s however did not send a letter. We as a family will never get that jab.


20 posted on 02/03/2022 6:45:28 PM PST by TermLimits4All (Biden will never be my President. There’s only 1 option left and it won’t be pretty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson