Posted on 02/03/2022 6:16:52 PM PST by delta7
Although vaccination is recognized as the cause of death by doctors and the insurance company, it has refused to pay out. The reason is because the side effects of the Corona jabs are known and published. They argue that the deceased took part in an experiment at his own risk. Covid-19 in itself is not classed as a “critical illness”.
According to the company, an experimental vaccination resulting in death is like suicide
The insurance company justified the refusal of payment to the family by stating that the use of experimental medication or treatments, including Corona injections, is expressly excluded from the insurance contract. The family’s subsequent lawsuit against the insurance company has been unsuccessful.
The court allegedly justified its ruling as follows: “The side effects of the experimental vaccine are published and the deceased could not claim to have known nothing about it when he voluntarily took the vaccine. There is no law or mandate in France that compelled him to be vaccinated. Hence his death is essentially suicide.” Since suicide is not covered by the policy from the outset, the insurance refuses to budge.
Scandalous verdict: taking a fatal risk is legally suicide
“The court recognizes the classification of the insurer who, in view of the announced side effects, including death, legally regards participation in the phase three experiment, whose proven harmlessness is not given, as voluntarily taking a fatal risk that is not covered by the contract and legally recognized as suicide. The family has appealed. However, the insurer’s defense is recognized as well-founded and contractually justified, as this publicly known fatal risk is legally considered suicide, since the customer has been notified and has agreed to voluntarily take the risk of death without being obliged or compelled to do so.”
No surprise: Mainstream media is silent
This case has not yet been reported in France ‘s mainstream media. The case was published by the family’s lawyer, Carlo Alberto Brusa, on social media. Unfortunately, no sources or court records are given, which is why the authenticity of the report cannot currently be verified although there have been other warnings regarding the risk associated with the jabs recognized by insurers. In the US, the American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI) has denied reports of non-payment.
Censorship
In recent months, many French anti-vaccine groups of the social network Facebook have been victims of sudden, unjustified closures, especially support groups for Brusa and Professor Didier Raoult. The latter has often been criticized for his positions on vaccines, hydroxychloroquine and his criticism of the mismanagement of the epidemic by the Macron government.
At the end of last year, the main support group for Didier Raoult was deactivated before it was reactivated, thanks to a mobilization on social networks and a massive relay on alternative media. On November 27, a teacher support group for Brusa was suspended. With no less than 310 000 members to its credit, the group created in March 2020 was closed for having shared the complaint by Brusa concerning the wearing of masks for children. The Parisian lawyer and his association Réaction-19 was accused of spreading a “conspiracy”.
Global difficulties for insurers due to vaccines
Actuaries have been warning that rising claims will be eroding the capital which insurers set aside to avoid insolvency. Notably, older people do not take out life insurance, which means that the claims have been from younger clients. Insurers say that they expect a rise in excess deaths.
According to Alex Berenson, the risk of injury or death from the jab is exceptionally high judging from Canadian data.
The refusal to pay for a vaccine-related death may not be surprising since globally the life insurance industry has been hit with reported claims of $5,5 billion in the first nine months of 2021 versus $3,5 billion for the whole of 2020, according to insurance broker Howden.
Dutch insurer Aegon, with two-thirds of its business in the US, said its American claims in the third quarter were $111 million, up from $31 million a year earlier.
Vaccine deaths may force insurers to raise premiums and some have indicated that they intend to punish the unvaccinated for their financial woes.
All of us who were saying because it was experimental and voluntary, referred to the insurance people who warned this would occur.
We were told we were lying by the vaxholes here.
What’s about time?
A French underwriter, oui?
I’m a little suspicious that this article doesn’t give the name of the insurance company. Not to say it didn’t happen, but...
“Unfortunately, no sources or court records are given, which is why the authenticity of the report cannot currently be verified…”
Court cases are among the easiest things to verify. The fact that none is forthcoming is extraordinarily suspect.
If it is only being reported on social media, it should be deemed a lie until shown otherwise.
Mandating employers are about to receive a big increase in lawsuits, I think. They have no government mandates to hide behind...
They will claim they did, at the time. Before the various courts halted them.
Yep. There you have it.
I’m sorry. This just didn’t happen.
One website quotes this as the “judge’s verdict:”
“The side effects of an experimental vaccine are being made public, and the deceased could not have professed ignorance when voluntarily taking the vaccine. There is no law or regulation in France requiring him to be vaccinated. Therefore, his death is, in fact, a suicide. The Court recognizes the qualification of an insurer who legally regards participation in the third phase experiment, the lack of evidence of which has not been proven, as the voluntary assumption of a fatal risk not covered by the contract, taking into account the declared side effects, including death is covered and legally recognized as suicide. The family filed an appeal. However, the insurer’s defense is recognized as reasonable and contractually justified, since this well-known risk of death is legally considered suicide, the client was notified and agreed to voluntarily risk his life without being forced to do so.“
———-
That’s a write up straight out of qtard land. Real judges don’t write like that.
Let us know when you have something more than an anti-vax fever dream.
More $ for my kin. We remain “NON GMO”.
There are still going to be enough employers who did it after the USSC ruling and enough victims. I think this is what will break the vax mandates once the first big case win comes in.
Under the Admiralty law based US system, certainly. Can the same be said for Napoleonic law based French jurisprudence? Maybe not so much, no?
The US court system isn’t based on Admiralty Law. It’s based on common law.
And yes, French court decisions are accessible, even though they don’t follow stare decisis.
https://libguides.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/law-french/cases
Bkmk
How do you figure?
My life insurance company sent me a letter detailing the exclusion of coverage for an experimental vaccination. My wife’s however did not send a letter. We as a family will never get that jab.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.