Posted on 11/17/2021 8:38:39 AM PST by Red Badger
SCOOP: @HumanEvents has obtained both versions of the Kyle Rittenhouse drone video
The low quality version provided to the defense
And the HD version withheld by prosecutors
Here is the low quality version: pic.twitter.com/FmkRWsgS2Y
— Jacek Posobiec 🇺🇸🇵🇱 (@JackPosobiec) November 17, 2021
HD Video withheld by Binger shows Kyle did not aim the rifle at Ziminskis.
And here is the HD version that was withheld from the defense team
The HD version clearly shows Kyle did not aim his rifle at the Ziminskis pic.twitter.com/DQRxfhrlE1
— Jacek Posobiec 🇺🇸🇵🇱 (@JackPosobiec) November 17, 2021
Motion filed…
Cont'd pic.twitter.com/JJf97z5VSI
— Jacek Posobiec 🇺🇸🇵🇱 (@JackPosobiec) November 17, 2021
Dismiss all charges with prejudice.
Sanction the prosecution.
Notify the Bar Association of the conduct and have them disbarred.
L
I’ve seen comments to the effect that the commenters can’t see a difference between the two versions. The difference is STARK! I suspect those commenters are leftists trying to minimize this prosecutorial misconduct.
At some point just get a rope...
The commenters are using CRT monitors on 386's in their mom's basement. Leftists are cheap bastards................
I didn’t click, but I will speak more to the technical reasons why this is important. When viewed at smaller resolutions, or on smaller screens, the difference wont be as apparent. But when viewed up close on a larger screen, the difference is going to be obvious.
MORE IMPORTANTLY, with high resolution video, you can crop and blow up a smaller area of the video with much much better visibility with a high resolution video. Low res wont tolerate this, and will appear very blocky, grainy, or blurry if pixel averaging is done.
There are many reasons why this case should never have gone to jury deliberations.
But this ... https://freerepublic.com/tag/jumpkickman/index
This is outrageous. The DA’s office withheld information from the defense. It just came to light AFTER closing arguments by both sides.
So why is the jury deliberating?
The judge should have dismissed with prejudice two days ago.
When the hell are we going to lock up these highly paid govt workers for their illegal actions.
Locking them up accomplishes nothing. They will be pardoned.
True.
It’s like the difference between 4k and 480 res on a flatscreen..................
I saw that, too. Unbelievable...and they never arrested this “career criminal”.
Kyle Rittenhouse: Claim: prosecutors hid HD video of confrontation
What I would like people to look at in the HD video is when Rittenhouse is running from Rosenbaum and Rosenbaum throws the white plastic bag.
The prosecution made a big deal there was nothing in the bag other than medical papers. However, you can see when Rosenbaum throws the bag the bag travels at a high rate of speed meaning there was something heavy in that bag. Also, when it hits Rittenhouse it hits him hard enough he reacts.
You can even see it in the low definition video. I don't know why the defense didn't mention it or see it.
Absolutely! No excuses, and throw the book at anyone who damages as much as a window in Kenosha when this happens!
Jumpkickman is black. So he gets a ‘Get out of Jail Free Card’.
Binger and the DA’s office however. They should be disbarred from their failure to disclose this as required by law.
But the case has been handed over to the jury. So they can still call a mistrial?
Maybe this is why it took the investigator 20 hours to work on the video? He had to make sure that it was blurry enough to fit the ADA’s case. I wonder how much cash was handed to him under the table.
No, you can use the ENHANCE feature when zooming in. I see it in movies and TV all the time. I saw an episode of CSI where grainy ATM camera video was used to zoom in on a car’s windshield registration sticker across the street and get the numbers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.