Posted on 06/27/2021 5:54:44 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
The European database of suspected drug reaction reports is EudraVigilance, which also tracks reports of injuries and deaths following the experimental COVID-19 “vaccines.”
A subscriber from Europe recently emailed us and reminded us that this database maintained at EudraVigilance is only for countries in Europe who are part of the European Union (EU), which comprises 27 countries.
The total number of countries in Europe is much higher, almost twice as many, numbering around 50, although there are some differences of opinion as to which countries are technically part of Europe.
So as high as these numbers are, they do NOT reflect all of Europe. The actual number in Europe who are reported dead or injured due to COVID-19 shots would be much higher than what we are reporting here…
(Excerpt) Read more at technocracy.news ...
Peer reviewed study;
“our estimates show that we have to accept 4 fatal and 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations in order to save the lives of 2–11 individuals per 100,000 vaccinations, placing risks and benefits on the same order of magnitude.”
Simply put: As we prevent three deaths by vaccinating, we incur two deaths.
pong
If the vaccine is taken by free consent, that's a statistic. If it's done by compulsion, it's human sacrifice.
We should never have to accept that.
I imagine these numbers are only the short-term health effects from a shot.
It will be interesting to find out how many people are carrying around a time bomb in their bodies that has a six months to 20 year fuse.
Please pass the HCQ & Ivermectin.
Vaccinated people can hurt you if you are in close contact with them. My friend is a bartender and she is in close contact with her customers. A couple of which have recently been “vaccinated”. She is in her 50’s and has not had a period in over tens years. Until now that is, after “her people” got the jab. She blames it on protein(SARS-CoV-2 spike protein) shedding. She might be right, I can’t think of any other reason.
I listened to the inventor of the mRNA technology on the podcast Dark Horse. According to him, and I’m taking license here, but I’ll link to the podcast. We don’t know that the vaccine is safe. We don’t know for certain that it is unsafe. But we are vaccinating millions of people with little regard to the bad reactions, some of which would have resulted in another drug being withdrawn. The data simply isn’t there to justify the level of risk our society is taking.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9ZXBsSkYLE&t=0s
People have been conditioned such that covid and its vaccines saturates our thinking if we are not careful. There are other things going on in the biology of our bodies. As a layman I don’t know why her periods would start again, but my inability to know would not mean it has to be the latest thing everybody is conditioned to think about.
Thank goodness we don’t have any of those bad results here. /off sarc
Gee another vaccine scare article. What is left out is the number 331 million. That’s the number of people who have been vaccinated in the EU. If we take this article’s numbers at face value, that means the adverse reaction rate is around 0.4%, and the death rate is about 0.005%. These numbers aren’t really out of line with most other vaccines out there.
Further though, these adverse effects reporting systems do not make any attempt to establish causation. The simple fact is that out of 331 million people, it would be expected that all of these symptoms, including death, would be observed at some frequency. The real question is whether, for example, a 0.005% death rate over a given time exceeds the expected population death rate for that time (Here’s a hint: it does NOT).
If you personally don’t want to be vaccinated, fine, don’t get it. But why is it that people feel the need to spread fear about these vaccines?
WHOA!
“ Simply put: As we prevent three deaths by vaccinating, we incur two deaths”
A lot of choices were made about which data to use, to get to those numbers - all were in the same direction, of reducing the benefit to risk ratio of the vaccines.
In judging the benefits of the vaccines, they included the lower numbers measured during the process of vaccination (e.g. a week after a first shot) as well as once fully vaccinated. Most people reading the dramatic 2 for 3 headline will assume it was for fully vaccinated people.
Then they used a time window of only 4-6 weeks, to determine how many cases and deaths from COVID were avoided. Clearly vaccine protection extends far beyond that short window, and more cases and deaths would be avoided, beyond six weeks.
When it came to assessing the risks of the vaccine, they chose the extreme outlier among European data sources, the Dutch, which reflects a rate of adverse effects almost twenty times higher than the German.
Clearly, this was an agenda driven study.
Fauci is a deity. Trust the science....move along nothing to see here.
“But why is it that people feel the need to spread fear about these vaccines?”
What ever the gov’t reports regarding deaths from this UNapproved Vaccine you might as well double, triple or since WHO, the CDC and the rest of the scum out there wouldn’t tell the truth if their lives depended on it.
The same analysis applies to COVID itself. Nothing but fear and lies for a year and half. Cases, cases, cases and death by COVID even if COVID is only detected. Killed in a motorcycle accident? COVID present? DEATH BY COVID! CDC as of August of 2020 stated real death by COVID only: 9000 deaths, whereas, the public cooked number, at the time, was topping 300,000. 2.2 million Americas die each year on average, . . .has that number gone up during COVID? NO!
If people are wary of a "vaccine" that isn't a vaccine but a experimental, untested, gene therapy, it may have something to do with being incessantly lied to for over a year and a half.
You post lies every day. Your whole agenda is lying.
“Post hoc ergo prompter hoc” AND “argument ad ignoratum”: congratulations. You’ve managed to commit two logical fallacies in one post.
You’re in good company though. When it comes to vaccine-scare arguments, these fallacies are almost always the basis for the “argument”. “My brother’s, friend’s, uncle’s former roommate got the shot and then he had genitalia warts the next day!” That MUST have been from the shot — he didn’t have genital warts before the shot. I can’t think of ANY other cause for his genital warts, so it MUST have been the shot.
Read these vaccine-scare items critically and you’ll see that these are the two (fallacious) arguments at their core.
1. It happened after vaccination so it must have been caused by it. Sorry, but no. Worldwide over a half billion people have received a COVID vaccine. Do you really think NONE of those 500+ million would have died during the past 7 months since vaccinations began? No skin conditions? No blood clots? If you want to demonstrate that a safety issue is present, it’s not sufficient to simply count adverse reactions or deaths. You must compare that count to a count of similar effects among an unvaccinated population of the same size. That’s something NEVER meantioned in these scare articles.
2. I can’t think of any reason other than the vaccine why it happened, so the vaccine must have caused it. This one should be obvious; things happen to people all the time, and the cause is not always apparent. People who are vaccinated also do other things, are exposed to toxins or pathogens unrelated to the vaccine, and may have undetected health issues unrelated to the vaccine. Again, it’s never mentioned that the adverse reactions reported may not be caused by the vaccine.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.