Peer reviewed study;
“our estimates show that we have to accept 4 fatal and 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations in order to save the lives of 2–11 individuals per 100,000 vaccinations, placing risks and benefits on the same order of magnitude.”
Simply put: As we prevent three deaths by vaccinating, we incur two deaths.
If the vaccine is taken by free consent, that's a statistic. If it's done by compulsion, it's human sacrifice.
We should never have to accept that.
WHOA!
“ Simply put: As we prevent three deaths by vaccinating, we incur two deaths”
A lot of choices were made about which data to use, to get to those numbers - all were in the same direction, of reducing the benefit to risk ratio of the vaccines.
In judging the benefits of the vaccines, they included the lower numbers measured during the process of vaccination (e.g. a week after a first shot) as well as once fully vaccinated. Most people reading the dramatic 2 for 3 headline will assume it was for fully vaccinated people.
Then they used a time window of only 4-6 weeks, to determine how many cases and deaths from COVID were avoided. Clearly vaccine protection extends far beyond that short window, and more cases and deaths would be avoided, beyond six weeks.
When it came to assessing the risks of the vaccine, they chose the extreme outlier among European data sources, the Dutch, which reflects a rate of adverse effects almost twenty times higher than the German.
Clearly, this was an agenda driven study.
Fauci is a deity. Trust the science....move along nothing to see here.
Still alive and kicking. Just saying.