Posted on 06/27/2021 5:54:44 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
I just don’t think that teaching my cells to produce a pathogenic SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is a good idea. I want my cells producing the proteins their DNA directs them to produce.
I got a bowl of 1000 M&Ms for you four will cause permanent nerve damage, one will kill you in days and one will kill you within hours.
Now, I want to make it mandatory for you to eat five. Odds are you won’t get sick or die.
...spread fear about these vaccines?
___________________________________________
Dr. Malone and others who are providing information have been inoculated. Perhaps they are justifiably concerned?
The figures are a small part of the actual results. The data covers the EU (1/2 of Europe), which makes it even more significant. The USA data is reportedly manipulated and MDs are discouraged from reporting, according to their own reportage.
If this was any other medical or food or chemical product, the world would be up in arms just on the small amount of data known to date.
There are no *anti-vaxxers*. That is a political term, like deplorable. We’ve all been vaxxed for many conditions. We have friends and family currently inoculated with this preparation. Many of the concerned are experiencing adverse reactions and are given no other cause or any reassurance of resolution. Transmission effects are widely reported. The global PTB are frantic to get a needle in every human arm across the globe by various deadlines and are proposing *boosters* in perpetuity for a disease with low rates of mortality/morbidity. Educated professionals are questioning this, since it appears unrelated to any health benefits for anyone. The inoculation confers no immunity, protects no one from transmission and mitigates symptoms, which allows the evolution of *variants*. All this was known and the inoculation pushers do not deny that, citing *superior benefits* over *rare adverse events*.
You may be sanguine and that’s fine. Don’t shut up the growing number of impacted and the growing number of studies by educated professionals just because you have no personal concerns.
These are significant data data points. There are threats to make the inoculation mandatory and, indeed, they are fast becoming so in a global coercive environment. If the un-inoculated cannot opt out and must shut up to preserve the equanimity of the inoculated while being marginalized from normal life for their personal medical decision, that is the definition of tyranny.
Why are the inoculated so concerned with the promulgation of actual, verified data?
I see your ‘agenda driven study’ and raise you an ‘agenda driven study’.
Ohhhh...wait: I forgot. YOUR studies are ‘scientific’, redefining ‘outlier’ to ‘inconvenient data’.
Got it. /s
Maybe your doctor can apply some leeches when you get sick if that’s really how you feel
________________
Medically grown sterile leeches have been used for over a decade to debride necrotic tissue. This is done in hospitals and clinics, routinely.
Again, it’s never mentioned that the
adverse reactions reported
may not be caused by the vaccine./
Well that settles it then
Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)
is worthless and should be shut down
( so glad the fraudici bots have enlightened me )
Ok, you never said to get rid of vaers,
but that’s the logical conclusion you posit.
” doesn’t prove it was the vax”
Then why have it ? ,
if there is no way to tell
if it was the vax that caused
an adverse reaction.
It makes vaers unreliable
and functionaly worthless.
The logical conclusion of your assertions
that vaers doesn’t
prove anything , useless,
is that we should get rid of
vaers cuz it doesn’t serve a
purpose.
No, you just want to denigrate anything
that contradicts your provax stance.
Like the vaers incriminating data.
Look forward to another of
your 10000
weasel word rebuttal
that won’t
touch my point with tony’s tellywacker.
I’m not sure if it’s your logical thinking I like better or your paragraph separation.
VAERS certainly serves a purpose. It allows a comparison of the prevalence of various conditions among those vaccinated with the prevalence of those same conditions among the general population. The second part of that is what the vaccine-scare people leave out. They say “Look, 15000 people who were vaccinated have died.” That’s true, but incomplete. The deaths reported in VAERS may or may not have been vaccine-related. Based on the currently available data, of which VAERS is a part, it appears that the death rate among vaccinated individuals is lower than that typically observed in the general population. If the vaccine is safe and effective, is this not what you’d expect? You certainly would not expect zero deaths among the 500 million or so people who have been vaccinated worldwide.
As of Jan 1,2020 the population estimate for the EU is just a bit under 448 million. You’d also have to consider vaccinated population, and I believe the vaccination rate in the EU is higher than in the US. The data I saw indicated about 330 million vaccinated in the EU.
"1.5 Million vaccine injuries & +15,000 DEATHS is a very small price
to pay for all the benefit to others who were not injured or killed!"
- FreeRepublic CDC Paid VaxSpokepersons
If the drug is so safe then remove all legal indemnifications for companies producing the drug to lawsuits and damage claims.
Thank you for being so prompt
in delivering your word salad
\\VAERS certainly serves a purpose. It allows a
comparison of the prevalence of various conditions
among those vaccinated with the
prevalence of those same conditions
among the general population. //
That’s not the purpose of vaers, to
compare conditions ,
whatever the hell that’s supposed to mean
( nice weasel euphemism though )
It’s purpose is to document adverse
reactions.
\\The second part of that //
Second part of what ? Your euphemism
unrelated to adverse effects ?
\\is what the vaccine-scare people leave out.
They say “Look, 15000 people who were vaccinated
have died.” That’s true, but incomplete.
The deaths reported in VAERS may
or
may not have been vaccine-related.//
Then you ,are , asserting vaers
is dysfunctional in its primary
purpose, thought so.
But you make the connection to avoid
admitting you view vaers
as useless in its
primary purpose
\\Based on the currently available data, //////
What other data fraudcibot ?
Got some citations or numbers ?.
You
assert with no proof.
Just weasel word salad.
\\\of which VAERS is a part, it.
appears ////
Appears ? Great use of another
weasel word to connect undefined and
uncredited assertations.
\\\that the death rate///
Death rate of what ? Murder, auto
accidents, conditions , what ?
\\\among ///
Among a·mong
surrounded by; in the company of.
If you had used the word of ,
instead of the weasel word among,
you would have scored lower on
the weasel word scale, just sayin’.
\\\vaccinated individuals is lower than that
typically. ////
Typically ?
typ·i·cal·ly
adverb
in most cases; usually.
So not definativly is,
not definativly isn’t ,
but a maybe.
Just full of weasel words aren’t you.
\\\\observed ///
Observed by who ?
Where’s the citation, you know ,
your data.
\\\\in the general population. If the vaccine
is safe and effective,
is this not what you’d expect? ///
Expect ?
You’ve provided a mish mash
of uncited weasel word assertations
strung together and haven’t actually
even provided any data to come
to a conclusion
much less an expectation.
\\\\You certainly would not
expect zero deaths among the 500 million or so
people who have been vaccinated worldwide.///
People died and that proves the vax
is safe. Now that is world class 1984
weasel wording there bud !
Glad to see you have access to
tony’s telly wacker .
..
Well you better get yourself appointed to the peer review!! They obviously needed your opinion!
Sis boom bah yea vaccine!! Cheerleading, Fauci talking points.
“Well you better get yourself appointed to the peer review!”
Read the article that you posted - not just the summary. They passed peer review by explicitly acknowledging those concerns about their choices in the body of the paper. Then, given those choices, they could publish the 2 for 3 tagline.
It must take a lot of effort to remain that ignorant.
In 2019, a total of 2,854,838 resident deaths were registered in the United States Source:https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db395.htm
In 2020, approximately 3,358,814 deaths† occurred
in the United States.
Source: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/pdfs/mm7014e1-H.pdf
Sounds like a half a million extra deaths during 2020 to me, Chief.
We have been had. COVID-19 0.03% 2021 (as of March 15)
See https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2021/05/the_incredible_vanishing_flu.html about virus and mask size and flu.
Visualized: the World’s Deadliest Pandemics by Population Impact
https://www.visualcapitalist.com/worlds-deadliest-pandemics-by-population-impact
Masks do not block viruses. 1,000 times smaller then the weave of face masks.
“In his private emails, Fauci repeatedly told friends and colleagues that surgical or cloth face masks were useless, as the COVID-19 particles were too small to be blocked by simple cloth.”
https://nationalfile.com/fauci-covid-19-is-small-enough-to-pass-through-the-material-of-face-masks-email
CDC Covid-19 Survival Rates as of 10/2020
Age 0-19 — 99.997%
Age 20-49 — 99.98%
Age 50-69 — 99.5%
Age 70+ — 94.6%
Pandemic Death Toll by % of Population Year of Population Estimate
Black Death 51.0% 1300
Plague of Justinian 19.1% 500
Smallpox 12.1% 1500
Antonine Plague 2.6% 200
Spanish Flu 2.5% 1919
The Third Plague 1.0% 1850
HIV/AIDS 0.7% 1981
COVID-19 0.03% 2021 (as of March 15)
CDC report that shows that only 6 percent of reported COVID deaths were people who died of COVID alone
I should point out that IF you get the chinese virus those are the survival rates. The mask does not stop any virus as the virus is so small.
95% of the flu “disappeared” First time in history too.... that is because states and hospitals make a lot more money if you are diagnosed with the chinese virus, so they lie about the flu and say it is the chinese virus.
Note that the news media, gov’ts, the communist chinese do not want you to called it the chinese or wuhan virus even though every other virus is named for the place it originates.
Also note that the news readers and ‘entertainment’ people do not wear a mask on tv news and shows and they are not dying. Not a sniffle.
Then keep fearing the fear and lock yourself in your basement. They have been lying and cooking the books since day one. It’s a bad flu, not the end of the world, Jeez.
Thanks, I’m perfectly content with my family’s chances during this epidemic.
If you’re too daft to see that providing wrong statistics completely undermines any point you might think you’re making, then have at it.
Seems pretty silly to use easily disproven phony numbers to argue that books are “cooked”, but you do you...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.