Skip to comments.Human Organ Chips Shift Amodiaquine from Old Antimalarial to Promising COVID-19 Treatment
Posted on 05/04/2021 1:55:19 PM PDT by RC one
As the COVID-19 pandemic continues, the pace of vaccine development has surpassed anyone’s wildest expectations. Unfortunately, drug development for treatments has not kept the same pace. Indeed, there are still very few effective treatments for COVID-19. Now, a collaboration between four research institutes has identified the antimalarial drug amodiaquine as a potent inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2 infection in human lung cells and in living preclinical models. This breakthrough helped secure the inclusion of amodiaquine in a COVID-19 clinical trial that is currently underway in 13 different countries in Africa where this drug is inexpensive and widely available.
The research is published in Nature Biomedical Engineering in the paper, “A human-airway-on-a-chip for the rapid identification of candidate antiviral therapeutics and prophylactics.”
While many groups around the world have been testing existing drugs for efficacy against COVID-19 using cultured cells, cells grown in a dish do not behave like the cells in a living human body, and many drugs that appear effective in lab studies do not work in patients.
The collaboration established a human Organ Chip-based drug testing ecosystem that streamlines the process of evaluating the safety and efficacy of existing drugs for new medical applications, and provides a proof-of-concept for the use of Organ Chips to rapidly repurpose existing drugs for new medical applications, including future pandemics.
When a group of drugs that had been shown previously to have efficacy in cell culture models, were tested in the more sophisticated microfluidic Lung Airway Chip, most of these drugs (including hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine) were not effective. However, the antimalarial drug amodiaquine was highly effective at preventing viral entry. These results were then validated in cultured cells and in a small animal model of COVID-19 using infectious SARS-CoV-2 virus.
“The speed with which this team assembled, pivoted to COVID-19, and produced clinically significant results is astonishing,” said senior author and Wyss Institute Founding Director Don Ingber, MD, PhD. “We started testing these compounds in February 2020, had data by March, and published a preprint in April. Thanks to the openness and collaboration that the pandemic has sparked within the scientific community, our lead drug is now being tested in humans. It’s a powerful testament to Organ Chips’ ability to accelerate preclinical testing.”
Over three years ago the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) awarded funding to Ingber’s team to explore whether its human Organ Chip microfluidic culture technology, which faithfully mimics the function of human organs in vitro, could be used to confront potential biothreat challenges including pandemic respiratory viruses.
The human Airway Chip that the Wyss team developed for these studies is a microfluidic device about the size of a USB memory stick that contains two parallel channels separated by a porous membrane. Human lung airway cells are grown in one channel that is perfused with air, while human blood vessel cells are grown in the other channel, which is perfused with liquid culture medium to mimic blood flow. Cells grown in this device naturally differentiate into multiple airway-specific cell types in proportions that are similar to those in the human airway, and develop traits observed in living lungs such as cilia and the ability to produce and move mucus. Airway Chip cells also have higher levels of angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) receptor protein, which plays a central role in lung physiology and is used by SARS-CoV-2 to infect cells.
“Our biggest challenge in shifting our focus to SARS-CoV-2 was that we don’t have lab facilities with the necessary infrastructure to safely study dangerous pathogens. To get around that problem, we designed a SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus that expresses the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, so that we could identify drugs that interfere with the spike protein’s ability to bind to human lung cells’ ACE2 receptors,” said Haiqing Bai, PhD, a postdoctoral fellow at the Wyss Institute and co-lead author on the study. “A secondary goal was to demonstrate that these types of studies could be carried out by other Organ Chip researchers who similarly have this technology, but lack access to lab facilities required to study highly infectious viruses.”
Armed with the pseudovirus that allowed them to study SARS-CoV-2 infection, the team first perfused the Airway Chips’ blood vessel channel with several approved drugs, including amodiaquine, toremifene, clomiphene, chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine, arbidol, verapamil, and amiodarone, all of which have exhibited activity against other related viruses in previous studies. However, in contrast to static culture studies, they were able to perfuse the drug through the channels of the chip using a clinically relevant dose to mimic how the drug would be distributed to tissues in our bodies. After 24 hours they introduced SARS-CoV-2 pseudovirus into the Airway Chips’ air channel to mimic infection by airborne viruses, like that in a cough or sneeze.
Only three of these drugs—amodiaquine, toremifene, and clomiphene—significantly prevented viral entry without producing cell damage in the Airway Chips. The most potent drug, amodiaquine, reduced infection by about 60%. The team also performed spectrometry measurements to assess how the drugs impacted the airway cells. These studies revealed that amodiaquine produced distinct and broader protein changes than the other antimalarial drugs.
Despite the promise of amodiaquine, the team still needed to demonstrate that it worked against the real infectious SARS-CoV-2 virus. Ingber teamed up with Matthew Frieman, PhD, associate professor at the University of Maryland School of Medicine and Benjamin tenOever, PhD, professor at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, both of whom already had biosafety labs set up to study infectious pathogens.
The Frieman lab tested amodiaquine and its active metabolite, desethylamodiaquine, against native SARS-CoV-2 via high-throughput assays in cells in vitro, and confirmed that the drug inhibited viral infection.
In parallel, the tenOever lab tested amodiaquine and hydroxychloroquine against native SARS-CoV-2 in a head-to-head comparison in a small animal COVID-19 model, and saw that prophylactic treatment with amodiaquine resulted in ~70% reduction in viral load upon exposure, while hydroxychloroquine was ineffective. They also saw that amodiaquine prevented the transmission of the virus from sick to healthy animals more than 90% of the time, and that it was also effective in reducing viral load when administered after introduction of the virus. Thus, their results suggest that amodiaquine could work in both treatment and prevention modes.
“Seeing how beautifully amodiaquine inhibited infection in the Airway Chip was extremely exciting,” said Frieman. “And, the fact that it seems to work both before and after exposure to SARS-CoV-2 means that it could potentially be effective in a wide variety of settings.”
A preprint of the amodiaquine results was published online on April 15, 2020, which generated buzz in the scientific community. The results, along with studies from several other groups, contributed to amodiaquine’s inclusion in a clinical trial in collaboration with the University of Witwatersrand in South Africa and Shin Poong Pharmaceutical in South Korea last fall. A few months later, the Drugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative (DNDi) added amodiaquine to the ANTICOV clinical trial for COVID-19, which spans 19 sites in over 13 different countries in Africa.
While the identification of amodiaquine is a major boon in fighting COVID-19, the team already has their sights set on future pandemics. In addition to SARS-CoV-2, their recent publication details their success in finding drugs that could protect against or treat several strains of influenza virus.
“Thanks to our experience using this drug development pipeline to validate amodiaquine for COVID-19, we are now applying what we learned to influenza and other pandemic-causing pathogens,” said co-author Ken Carlson, PhD, a lead senior staff scientist who helps lead the Coronavirus Therapeutic Project Team at the Wyss Institute. “This process has given us confidence that Organ Chips are predictive of what we see in more complex living models of viral infections, and helped harness the creative cauldron of the Wyss Institute to consolidate and strengthen our therapeutic discovery engine.”
Which we already know is ineffective.
"Hey, loser - how come you can't drive your car after we let all the air out of the tires?"
Now, this is the part I like.
It sounds like its efficacy is right up there with the vaccines that have been developed. The reduction in viral load also sounds similar to Ivermectin which is strangely not discussed.
It’s interesting that another anti-malarial drug has promise.
I’m confounded as to why so many studies show zero efficacy with hydroxychloroquine yet the in-field practical results seem so promising.
They're failing to include the zinc ionophore.
"Wow! This flour makes really lousy bread! It doesn't rise at all!"
"You might want to try adding yeast..."
It has “quine” in its name.
I have no problem with meds that treat a disease but I still think a vaccine should be the front like drug of choice against viruses. I also think that Covid will ultimately adapt to any treatment we throw at it. I don’t see it going away.
“I’m confounded as to why so many studies show zero efficacy with hydroxychloroquine yet the in-field practical results seem so promising.”
Oh, yeah, the vaccine.
Been praying that the Lord has somebody come up with a low cost cure
Know that trade mags have agendas too.
It's because Trump mentioned it. Ivermectin is still unknown because it's cheap and would compete with meds that are $3-$4k per dose.
Hopefully the vaccine will work. But obviously on that graph, there was not enough people vaccinated to have any consequence when it was already clearly going down. I surmise we will find out in the fall. Viruses are seasonal. Praying the vaccines put an end to all this garbage.
I think Covid is a little bit seasonal but to start dropping in January like that? What kind of effed up seasonality is that? And it isn’t exactly cold and snowing in Mumbai right now. It’s 84 degrees at the moment. Brazil is pretty summery too. That’s not typically conducive to virus spread, not if you’re talking about Flu, RSV, Norovirus etc. I’m not sure seasonality is really a big factor for Covid, a small factor maybe. US cases and deaths both started dropping about the time or shortly after we were giving healthcare workers their second dose. I was at the front of the line for dose 1 and I got dose 2 on January 20th, a few hours before Biden was inaugurated. And, also, cases started dropping in April during wave 1-not mid January. Maybe it was the mitigation measures too?
>> there was not enough people vaccinated to have any consequence when it was already clearly going down
And the top vax graph doesn’t show the cumulative administration. It’s only showing the doses for the given day. In reality, the vax administration is an exponential curve that when projected onto the 2nd graph shows how little it affected the decline if having any effect at all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.