[PghBaldy]

Can't think of anything intelligent to say on this, though that never stops me usually.

[Recompennation]

Choose wisely grasshopper

[Fido969]

The fourth amendment is being chipped away to nothing.

[momincombatboots]

If you have a bumstock, it might be acceptable.

[Uncle Miltie]

Everyone knows where this is is going and the inevitable blowback.

[Bayard]

Can’t seize guns that are lost to a boating accident a few years ago.

[T.B. Yoits]

A warrant doesn’t just protect the occupants, it also protects the home invaders. They may not want to leave the precinct without it.

[knarf]

FAKE KILLING ? ?

[Jarhead9297]

It is times like this that I go back to this video clip and it’s perfect as it pertains to this thread.

https://youtu.be/DNDcd1Fe5lg

[Political Junkie Too]

However, there is a broader cousin to these amendments called the “community caretaking” exception. It originally derives from a case in which the police took a gun out of the trunk of an impounded vehicle without first obtaining a warrant. The Supreme Court held that there is a community caretaking exception to the 4th Amendment’s warrant requirement because police perform “community caretaking functions, totally divorced from the detection, investigation, or acquisition of evidence relating to the violation of a criminal statute." The Court held that police activity in furtherance of these functions does not violate the 4th Amendment as long as it is executed in a “reasonable” manner.

I would think that "community caretaking" stops at someone's front door.

Since Griswold, the Third Amendment prevents agents of the government from monitoring a person's activities inside their home. "Community caretaking" inside one's home would be unconstitutional under the Third Amendment.

-PJ

[Candor7]

Can’t think of anything intelligent to say on this, though that never stops me usually. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

How about:

“I don’t have any firearms.

I was taking them all out to a camp and the boat upset,

Danged if I didn’t lose the whole kit and caboodle in 2oo feet of water.”

Many hidden root cellars across this land, in rather obscure locations are about to be opened renovated and used.

Thanks for the warning Attorney Cosmoline.

[Antihero101607]

Well, this is fairly disturbing.

[rktman]

Hmmmm! With this SCOTUS? Approved. Next.

[motor_racer]

Isn’t this “settled law”?

[Carriage Hill]

“exigent circumstances” exception...
“emergency aid” exception,
“community caretaking” exception.

There’s always an “exception” to our Rights.

[RoseofTexas]

I can...WTH?!!!!

[Yogafist]

Prediction: Robert’s comes down in the side that guts the constitution. (Yeah, I know. That’s as easy as predicting the sunrise). With his comments undermining the first amendment in the recent California Church case, that the court should not second guess government experts, I don’t see how he stands against warrantless searches when a government “expert” orders them. This guy is writing the constitution as he goes.

[Cboldt]

There is also the “plain view” exception, which can be accomplisehd after the fact by swearing.

If that fails, the remedy for violation of the so-called requirement for a warrant is the case is closed. The police are free to repeat as often as they feel is appropriate.

[Diogenesis]

SCOTUS did not care about CCP seizing the USA
(they were paid off with Billions of $),

nor did they care the ObamaRomneyCARE was illegal
(Epstein Island’s and Malta’s Roberts lied),

nor would they protect either GEOTUS or the Am. People
(presumably their job description),

nor have they cared up the coverup of clean water
and curing medical technologies (except for themselves),

so Vegas will probably go for the
Maltese-,CCP-,Ukranian-,Vatican-run SCOTUS
to cut the necks of ALL Americans with their single
lying, seditious, treasonous, DS blade.

[SoFloFreeper]

There is no DECISION to make: all they can do is affirm or deny what the Constitution says....

[Pajamajan]

bttt