Skip to comments.
Texas Sues Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin at Supreme Court over Election Rules
Breitbart ^
| Dec 7, 2020
| Joel B. Pollack
Posted on 12/08/2020 5:38:16 AM PST by demkicker
The State of Texas filed a lawsuit directly with the U.S. Supreme Court shortly before midnight on Monday challenging the election procedures in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin on the grounds that they violate the Constitution.
Texas argues that these states violated the Electors Clause of the Constitution because they made changes to voting rules and procedures through the courts or through executive actions, but not through the state legislatures. Additionally, Texas argues that there were differences in voting rules and procedures in different counties within the states, violating the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. Finally, Texas argues that there were “voting irregularities” in these states as a result of the above.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Georgia; US: Michigan; US: Pennsylvania; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: electionfraud; godblesstexas; scotustexas; texas; tx; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 161-177 next last
To: SmokingJoe
Why couldn’t Guiliani have done his November 5th?As chairman of the FR Rudy 2008 caucus (and somehow unbanned), nobody here loves Rudy more than I do.
But, he's lost a few mph off the fastball at age 76, and he was not the right man for this job.
61
posted on
12/08/2020 6:15:25 AM PST
by
Jim Noble
(Lo there do I see the line of my people, back to the beginning)
To: demkicker
Watch the idiot judge declare that Texas doesn’t have standing...
62
posted on
12/08/2020 6:17:53 AM PST
by
rockrr
( Everything is different now...)
To: Magnum44
You need to read the articles to answer your own question.
63
posted on
12/08/2020 6:18:09 AM PST
by
demkicker
(My passion for freedom is stronger than that of Democrats whose obsession is to enslave me.)
To: fatima; Fresh Wind; st.eqed; xsmommy; House Atreides; Nowhere Man; PaulZe; brityank; Physicist; ...
Pennsylvania Ping!
Please ping me with articles of interest.
FReepmail me to be added to the list.
64
posted on
12/08/2020 6:19:09 AM PST
by
lightman
(I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
To: gov_bean_ counter
A state has amble standing to claim that election fraud in other states dilutes their electoral votes. This is an awesome move, timely, and could foprce SCOTUS to act.
65
posted on
12/08/2020 6:19:17 AM PST
by
Freedom_Is_Not_Free
(Love your enemies. Turn the other cheek. )
To: Magnum44
I’m being a little lazy this morning, but if those states were thrown out, what does that do to the remaining electoral vote count?If on candidate gets a majority, then the new House of Representatives chooses the President, but with each state getting one vote...in which case very likely Trump wins.
To: Magnum44
I’m being a little lazy this morning, but if those states were thrown out, what does that do to the remaining electoral vote count? I'm even lazier, but if that happens 270 will be impossible for Joe and so either forces the GOP state legislatures to act or goes to congress.
We win either way.
67
posted on
12/08/2020 6:20:51 AM PST
by
AAABEST
(NY/DC/LA media/political/military industrial complex DELENDA EST)
To: rockrr
This goes straight to the SC - no judge can interfere.
68
posted on
12/08/2020 6:23:17 AM PST
by
demkicker
(My passion for freedom is stronger than that of Democrats whose obsession is to enslave me.)
To: AndyTheBear
It is a brilliant observation on your part, noting that all of the people kicked out of the room are crammed closely together. So much for safe distancing. You noted further proof of hypocrisy that suggests election fraud. They can’t claim
“safety” in forcing observers to stand 20 feet away from the tables they are supposed to be watching, and then say nothing about herding everyone close together outside the room.
Fabulous observation.
69
posted on
12/08/2020 6:25:00 AM PST
by
Freedom_Is_Not_Free
(Love your enemies. Turn the other cheek. )
To: demkicker
Read the article? I’ve been here long enough to know that’s only a desirement, not a requirement. 🤣
70
posted on
12/08/2020 6:25:53 AM PST
by
Magnum44
(My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them.)
To: marcusmaximus
John Cornyn is not happy about this.
___________________________________________________________
Getting nasty texts, calls, and emails from his masters.
71
posted on
12/08/2020 6:26:15 AM PST
by
JCL3
(As Richard Feynman might have said, this is reality taking precedence over public relations.)
To: Jane Long; luvie
72
posted on
12/08/2020 6:31:46 AM PST
by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: dp0622
73
posted on
12/08/2020 6:32:00 AM PST
by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: Army Air Corps
Saw that!!
God bless you, Texas! 🎶
74
posted on
12/08/2020 6:34:24 AM PST
by
Jane Long
(Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow,)
To: demkicker
I think more states should sue as well. Florida for one.
75
posted on
12/08/2020 6:36:24 AM PST
by
grimalkin
(Communism is the final logic of the dehumanization of man. -Fulton J. Sheen)
To: demkicker
Texas to Democrat Communist plotters trying to steal the election: “Surprise! Surprise! Surprise!”
To: gov_bean_ counter
Why don’t they have standing? Their legal votes in the Electoral College would be diluted by the illegal votes of Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan.
Ohio and Florida should join. Also every other state that has certified legal electors.
I’m moving to Texas. Their government and people have guts unlike the wusses in my state government.
To: demkicker
Justice Roberts will most likely say: “Texas has no legal standing!”
78
posted on
12/08/2020 6:38:42 AM PST
by
Safrguns
To: demkicker
This is the exact opposite of the PA Act 77 lawsuit.
This says that the state supreme court has no business overruling the state legislature. But the PA Act 77 lawsuit says that the legislature passed something opposed to the state constitution and it should be overruled by the state supreme court.
This isn't brilliant. It directly contradicts other lawsuits.
Also... Federalism. Texas has no business telling any other state how to conduct their elections (just as CA has no business telling TX how to conduct their elections). This is clearly unconstitutional.
To: Jim Noble
Well, I have to agree with you there. Giuliani is not as quick on his feet as he used to be. None of us old geezers is (and I am referring to myself here).
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 161-177 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson