Posted on 11/25/2020 7:30:05 AM PST by SJackson
Every challenge needs to be in court by December 8. Then it needs to be settled by the 14th before noon.
The clock is ticking. This is especially true in states with a democratic court system. They will not speed the process along, leaving little time to run through the Federal System.
I am not passing judgement either way, but ....tick tock.
A federal special prosecutor could be appointed after the first case of mail fraud is proved.
The special prosecutor would be as hard to ditch as Robert Mueller.
If they do not get to the bottom of this vote fraud now every election from here on will be moot. sad but true we will learn the true benefit and meaning of the black market because everything will be taxed or regulated beyond our ability to purchase them. guns, ammo, fuel, food, medicine.
While it is true that the clock is ticking, a technicality should not be an obstacle to justice.
The letter of the Constitution should not be a shield against the subversion of the spirit of the Constitution.
If the fraud is as broad and pervasive as it seems to be, it amounts to a wholesale subversion of the spirit of the Constitution, and SCOTUS must allow justice to prevail, even allowing for changes in the Constitutionally mandated timelines for Presidential succession.
Otherwise all future fraud attempts will succeed if they can use the tight timelines as a "built-in guarantee" against any remedy.
The letter of the Constitution should not be a shield against the subversion of the spirit of the Constitution.
I STILL cannot comprehend HOW Hunter (and by association, Joe) are even occupying a place in US politics on a level with and “equivalent” TO men and women in office, against whom there is NO such hard evidence, fraud, corruption, malfeasance, dereliction of duty, abuse of power....etc.
There are people in slam NOW doing hard time for crimes NO WHERE near as serious as have been proved against Joe and his creatures!
The most minute particle of such direct, personal, long-standing and proved acts and associations MUST exclude Joe altogether. HE ought to have been removed from office LONG AGO!! HE is completely unfit to get anywhere NEAR the WH or US taxpayer revenue!!!
I am not sure that international criminal conspiracy to subvert an election in the United States has a date deadline.
There is a report due on Dec. 18th by Homeland security on the issue. I certainly will reserve my judgement on events until that report is released. Most Americans I am sure would agree that if accusations approve true, then we must proceed to the 12th Amendment.
“The special prosecutor would be as hard to ditch as Robert Mueller.”
If Trump had fired Mueller there would have been a 24/7 media firestorm and outrage of moderate Republicans in the Senate. He would have been impeached in the Democrat House for obstruction of justice and enough weak RINO Republicans would have voted to convict and remove in the Senate.
If Trump appoints a special prosecutor on his way out, Biden will fire the special prosecutor during his first month and tell the public the best way to deal with the accusation of fraud is to have the states look into it. He might even appoint an official in the DOJ to “coordinate” with the states. The press will applaud. No way Pelosi’s House will impeach Biden even if photos are discovered of him on Epstein’s island. Democrats vote as a block on critical issues. Conservative talk radio will whine for a month. By March/April the firing will be forgotten. GOP politicians will be back to business doing deals for the donor base and enjoying their minority status.
Six months later the DOJ coordinator will issue a report to Congress stating there were a few instances of unintentional minor tabulating errors but no widespread fraud. The press will applaud. A few GOP politicians will whine, telling their constituents they are helpless to do anything due to Pelosi controlling the house. Your email will be deluged with appeals to give the RNC money to defeat Pelosi. Business as usual inside the beltway.
“Smoking guns” and “evidence” are not the problem.
The problem is that there is no one body that can produce the desired result. It must be produced by at least four (possibly five) state legislatures, who would have to (in Arizona’s case) ignore their OWN statutory law, and at least the USSC, which has not yet been given a case, let alone ruled on anything.
It’s not like Team Trump can go to a “court” and there is one result that “overturns” the election.
And everything must be done by De. 8, which I think is just 8 business days away.
I wonder if their “evidence” will also turn any House and Senate seats that may have been won fraudulently.
Trump is NOT GOING TO WIN. This is BS.
bttt
There will be a huge lawsuit filed tomorrow
I would urge the President to use the USAF to commandeer all major television stations and present the truth about China, Biden and the stolen elections to the public between now and Inauguration Day.
Its not just the elections they are stealing. I think they have been gaming the census too.
First of all, I am not an attorney. However, after 20 years as an Army intelligence officer specializing in counterterrorism and counterinsurgency operations, I went to work for the FBI, DOJ and the White House in a similar capacity and had the opportunity to assist US Attorneys and AUSAs in understanding complex evidence and preparing major cases for trial. There are a lot of misperceptions and misunderstanding about how the progression of cases from state to federal courts really works.
While time is short, there is plenty of time for Team Trump’s attorneys to pursue their efforts under Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2, which relegates responsibility for election law to state legislatures - there is no constitutional role for state executives or state judiciaries, and the 14th Amendment (equal protection). Sydney Powell’s pursuits clearly focus on felonious behavior, which will clearly take a great deal more time and involve multiple state and federal jurisdictions.
With respect to what she has stated, Sydney Powell, one of the most respected attorneys in the country, would not have said what she has without very solid evidence. Her comments and more have been echoed by Atlanta attorney Lin Wood, who is probably the most highly-regarded libel attorney in the country. Lin has stated openly that Georgia Governor Brian Kemp and Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger are corrupt and he can prove it. Strong statements for a highly-experienced libel attorney.
I have no idea to what extent Powell and Wood are working together, but it’s abundantly clear that they communicate. I fully expect that their efforts, Powell’s being nationwide and Wood’s focusing on Georgia, involve a broad range of felonies, from official corruption and kickbacks to outright manipulation of election results and related fraud of various types.
While I’m not normally a prognosticator of events without a complete understanding of relevant evidence, I strongly suspect that the Supreme Court will ultimately toss this election to the House of Representatives.
I don’t think the Founders could foresee a day in which the majority of elected officials and judges are immoral party hacks.
Yes, those are problems. You could do it with the right three, but I don’t see any states even mentioning the possibility. I doubt the USCC would overturn elections in three states, I doubt they’d overturn any, but there is a state legislative solution if they should. But that remote possibility also presumes three states voting for Trump electors, and every elector turning out to be loyal. Can’t say I wouldn’t like to see it, but I think pursuing criminal activities is the most important thing to come out of this, and I don’t any states stepping up there either.
Particularly the Court most responsible for upholding the Constitution. Naysayers predict the Supreme Court would never meddle in an election that would change the outcome. They have before so why wouldn’t they now? They are in the business of upholding the law, considering evidence, making findings of fact, listening to legal arguments, determining whether or not Constitutional violations have occurred, if harm was done and to whom and granting a prayer for relief.
If they found that there were massive voting irregularities and outright violations of the law and that these things interfered with the outcome of the election or gave unfair advantage to one candidate over another, they would have a legal and moral imperative to provide relief. That is their job.
They need to put up or shut up. This is just like the people are going to jail for the russia collusion hoax. Click bate sites putting out things that never happen.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.