Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Doesn't this also apply to Michigan and Wisconsin?
1 posted on 11/10/2020 12:05:10 PM PST by PJ-Comix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
To: PJ-Comix

“Doesn’t this also apply to Michigan and Wisconsin?”

I think so.

Two ways to go.

Throw out the state as a whole - state doesn’t count in EC.

Throw out compromised counties. State still contributes to EC.


2 posted on 11/10/2020 12:10:18 PM PST by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

If the votes cannot be verified, they are invalid and must not be counted.


3 posted on 11/10/2020 12:11:08 PM PST by The_Media_never_lie (We have just witnessed a "mostly fair" election.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

i believe the choice for electors then falls to the state legislature, if the election is deemed invalid.


5 posted on 11/10/2020 12:14:04 PM PST by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world or something)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
Equal protection argument.

In-Person voters "were required to sign voter registrations, have those signatures checked against voter rolls, vote in a polling place monitored by statutorily-authorized poll observers, and have their votes counted in a transparent and verifiable open and observed manner."

Mail-In voters voted in a system that "refused to require adequate verification of the voter’s identity. Rather than require votes to be received on the day of election, the Secretary permitted ballots received up to three days after the election to be counted without any evidence of timely mailing, such as a postmark. Finally, contrary to the in-person voting that is open and transparent to the parties and the candidates, Defendants permitted the review and counting of mail-in ballots largely in secret with no monitoring.”

-PJ

7 posted on 11/10/2020 12:14:55 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

Why is there no mention of computer tampering switching tens of thousands of votes from our President to Biteme?


9 posted on 11/10/2020 12:16:40 PM PST by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

l8r


10 posted on 11/10/2020 12:17:47 PM PST by preacher ( Journalism no longer reports news, they use news to shape our society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
👏👏👏
13 posted on 11/10/2020 12:21:44 PM PST by Ciexyz (Prayers for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix
The suit was filed in Williamsport - that’s Obamajudge Matt Brann.

It will be fascinating to see how an Odiousbama "judge" rules.

Next stop: 3rd Circuit - chief judge a Dubya judge, and an 8-6 split of Trump/Dubya judges versus RapinBill/Clownbammy judges...

en banc is 11 judges.

16 posted on 11/10/2020 12:23:36 PM PST by kiryandil (Chris Wallace: Because someone has to drive the Clown Car)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams

Exchange the word Constitution with Election System.


17 posted on 11/10/2020 12:26:33 PM PST by xenia ("In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

Provisional ballots are likely to gain trump 30-35k votes when they are all counted.

If the supremes enforce the law and throw out all late absentee ballots. Trump will win PA.

However need more than that to get to 270


21 posted on 11/10/2020 12:47:50 PM PST by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

Montgomery and Delaware County PA numbers are so fraudy. Check out the difference between 2016 and 2020 in that county. Over 100,000 more. That is the difference in the election.


26 posted on 11/10/2020 1:02:46 PM PST by Phillyred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

On a Birmingham radio show this morning a person called in and said they received a PA mail-in ballot which they had not requested.

The person said they used to live in PA but moved away in 1989. Apparently they were still on their voter rolls. They didn’t send it in but wondered if it would have been counted if they had sent it in.


27 posted on 11/10/2020 1:15:48 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

This should be an interesting case. I know that courts are extremely reluctant to overturn or discard an election, but when the number of errors and the consequences of these errors are so drastic, I can’t see how they can simply ignore it. But, I wonder what other remedies there might be.


31 posted on 11/10/2020 1:30:09 PM PST by Repealthe17thAmendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

14th Amenment, laws changed arbitrarily outside the legislature to disadvantage a portion of the citizenry. Federal case, it is.


32 posted on 11/10/2020 1:31:44 PM PST by Chaguito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

New York State law could require Hillary Clinton write down the names of her chosen electors every four years.

State law doesn’t have to be fair.

State law can leave discretion such as signature verification to officials and judges, but officials and judges can’t fundamentally change election law, only function within it.


33 posted on 11/10/2020 1:47:50 PM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

PA is a special case. They won’t be able to sort out good from bad ballots are far as ballot harvesting, etc, but they can disallow the votes received after 8 o’clock, which the law clearly requires, and those have been segregated.

Disallowing those will give Trump the win, without having to sort out that mess. It get a fair and correct result easily.


34 posted on 11/10/2020 1:49:22 PM PST by Fido969 (,i.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

“In a rush to count mail ballots”

Election theft appears to be a rather slow process.

Mishandling of mail ballots is where problems arise.


36 posted on 11/10/2020 1:51:34 PM PST by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fatima; Fresh Wind; st.eqed; xsmommy; House Atreides; Nowhere Man; PaulZe; brityank; Physicist; ...

Pennsylvania Ping!

Please ping me with articles of interest.

FReepmail me to be added to the list.

43 posted on 11/10/2020 2:33:24 PM PST by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

it would apply everywhere, and its my hope that what will come of this is REAL nationwide election reform, like we SHOULD of had after the 2000 election.

Our mish-mash patchwork system is NUTS! and the whole process needs to be standardized across the entire US.


44 posted on 11/10/2020 3:07:51 PM PST by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: PJ-Comix

You have to get SCOTUS to invalidate one state and then there is precedent for disqualifying other precincts where poll watchers were NOT allowed to observe.

Trump should be beating the drum WHEN (I am confident it will happen) that there should be a run-off election in these precincts with observers present. How can Biden say no to this? The media will scream bloody murder, but if he really won the election and really got these votes what does he have to fear?

Outside of this, there can be no confidence in the election by Trump voters. In fact, the longer this drags out the more moderates are going to wonder what happened.

How can you shut down the count and take a lid (like Biden) and all of a sudden you dump over 100,000 votes into the tally WITH NO OBSERVERS? In fact, Philly almost single-handily erased a 600,000 vote lead like magic.

In a sane world they would interview the poll workers and have them sign a 1001 (lying) statement up front. If they lie they can be charged - if they don’t lie they will not be charged.

Get a full statement from each of them regarding the providence of these specific votes - where did they come from and from whom. What were their instructions from election supervisors?


45 posted on 11/10/2020 3:20:35 PM PST by volunbeer (Find the truth and accept it - anything else is delusional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson