Why is there no mention of computer tampering switching tens of thousands of votes from our President to Biteme?
I heard it explained (during a conversation by Vodka and Guiliani) that the equal protection argument is a surer bet given the time constraints. The inequity is manifest.
Computer fraud would require an extensive investigation (which ought to be done afterwards and guilty parties made to pay)
I think the strategy is that since PA sent B-man over the top in the EC count, and since the equal protection argument was successful in Bush v Gore that’s the most promising avenue to have late mail-in ballots removed from the count.
The people sending in their ballots by mail were not validated to the same degree as those who voted in person.
Also, I heard Mark Levin say that when mail-in ballots were received that were not filled-out correctly, they helped people who voted Dem to correct their ballots but did not do the same for Repubs.