Posted on 09/20/2020 7:19:07 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Just when you thought 2020 couldn't get any crazier, Supreme Court justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg suddenly departs this world for, hopefully, a better one.
You have to respect that anyone strong, smart, and principled enough to serve on the Supreme Court. Supreme Court justices carry a heavy burden and do so for decades longer than presidents. The Notorious RBG, as she was called, was a saint to all Democrats and a heroine to women around the world. Her colleagues called her brilliant. Can't beat that.
Still, many Americans, especially Catholics, had a problem with Justice Ginsburg's staunch support for abortion. Abortion became "legal" via a Supreme Court ruling, not by virtue of the Legislature. As such, abortion advocates have always had nightmares about the Court flipping so far right that it directs Congress to pass the appropriate laws regarding abortion, thereby giving the people a voice — the way it should have been done in the first place.
Let's cut to the chase.
With the passing of Justice Ginsburg, the Dems' worst nightmare has now occurred. Their dream of unfettered abortion is in peril. Pending the wildest, nastiest Senate confirmation fight in recent history — which, after Kavanaugh, is saying a lot — the Notorious RBG's going to be replaced by the Heavenly ACB.
Judge Amy Coney Barrett is a devout Catholic who believes that life begins at conception. She's the mother of seven children, one of them special needs, two of them adopted. Can't get more pro-life than that.
And for being pro-life, Judge Barrett's going to get accused, defamed, roasted, and slandered. There will be no line of attack too low for Democrats and their minions in the press. Count on multiple pretend scandals, racy tidbits from shady former friends, unsubstantiated wrongdoing according to multiple anonymous sources.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
RE: It wont be her they savage, it will be her family members I bet. Just watch
Id like to see them savage the 2 black Haitian kids she adopted and also her disabled child. Let’s see how this plays out in the country and among likely voters...
The SCOTUS will be an issue in any case. But it’s only an issue for people who have already decided their vote, so it matters very little to the outcome.
This isn’t much of an “issue” election, those choices are made in people’s minds.
This is a turnout election.
Yes it will be an issue either way but I am convinced if she hasn’t been replaced by election day it will bring the rats out of every hole and basement. If it is a done deal I think it being a moot point will be much smaller motivator.
If for no other reason than to watch the dried-out biddies who'll be storming the Senate chamber in those stupid "Handmaid's Tale" red costumes have a cardiac infarction when she's voted to the high court.
The dims nightmare is they may lose the ability to force their will upon us and destroy the nation using the supreme court.
Me neither.
As I recall, the rallying cry of the GOP was “hey, he’s the president. He’s entitled to his nominee”, before the aforementioned leftists were confirmed with anywhere from 80-97 votes, or thereabouts.
Now, compare that to every Republican nominee, dating back to Robert Bork, including the upcoming pick who will be publicly drawn and quartered by the Democrats.
Does she understand the words "Shall Not Be Infringed" ?
Picking a women sure looks like pandering and pandering should never enter into the decision of a lifetime appointment.
This does not look like a good pick and feel fairly certain we will be disappointed.
If she's does not understand the 2nd Amendment she is NOT a Constitutionalist. There can be no exceptions.
"two adopted BLACK children"Why do we need to know that?
I thought they were Haitian. Is Haitian considered black?
Weren't there any American children available for adoption?
That was the only good thing that she ever did.
RE: Why do we need to know that? Can’t they be just 2 adopted children?
Judge Barrett isn’t the one who is actively telling the world that, her supporters are.
Why you may ask? Because, whether we like it or not, Conservatives are always being tainted by the left as RACISTS who HATE black people simply because of the color of her skin. He supporters have to point this fact out to blunt their attacks.
RE: Weren’t there any American children available for adoption?
Maybe this adoption site can answer that question:
https://creatingafamily.org/adoption-category/adopt-kids/
I seriously wonder if this time the Left will go beyond smears and filthmongering. I worry they will graduate to actual physical attacks against Barrett and her family.
Thanks for posting that link. This is the kind of thing we need to look at. In the past I've found that it was dissents that told a lot more about the thinking of a given justice. Opinions are fine and everything, but is in an authored dissent that the rubber truly meets the road.
This case is an excellent illustration of that.
Look what they did to Sarah Palin. They just load her picture and resume into the Democrat slime machine and turn her into the creature of their choice.
Fixed that for you. You're welcome. :-)
You might want to read through the link at post 21. Better yet, read the dissent linked in that article. I have done the latter, and I find that I'd be happy with someone like her taking on 2nd Amendment cases. She seems to believe that non-violent 'felons' have an individual right to keep and bear arm, and that to say otherwise is in direct contravention of precedent and the Constitution itself. I'd go further and say that anyone who has completed their sentence and any probation should have their rights fully restored, but we can't always have everything we want.
Girls save their meanest for other girls. I’m curious to see what garbage they invent but I’m expecting it will be cringe worthy.
Trump should pick the Indian guy (can’t remember his name). He is a genuine conservative, and how could the Dems vote against the first Asian-American Supreme Court justice?
I wouldn’t put it past them.. remember what they did to Sarah Palin’s kid :(
Didn’t Pres. Trump already say he would make his decision/announcement tomorrow (Monday)?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.