Ginsburg eviscerates 9th Circuit’s handling of immigration consultant's case

Fox News ^ | 5/8/2020 | Ronn Blitzer

[Blood of Tyrants]

Authoring a unanimous Supreme Court opinion, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg tore into the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for "drastically" straying from judicial norms when hearing a case involving a California immigration consultant.

After Evelyn Sineneng-Smith had been convicted of violating a federal law related to encouraging illegal immigration, the Ninth Circuit reversed the decision, not based on arguments presented by Sineneng-Smith, but by third parties the court brought in to submit arguments that the panel of judges themselves had suggested.

[Blood of Tyrants]

Synopsis: Lawyer breaks the law by encouraging foreigners to enter the country illegally and helps them illegally obtain documentation. She is indicted and charged.

Case winds it way up to the 9th Circus where the court invites third parties who are known to be pro-illegal immigration to make arguments supporting the lib lawyer.

Eventually it gets to the SC where not even RBG can side with the liberals.

[GreyFriar]

Does this show that Ginsburg is really a racist, deep in her heart?

[NativeSon]

I’m thinking she tried to eviscerate them because she needs new organs

[Moonman62]

Eventually it gets to the SC where not even RBG can side with the liberals.

...

It’s hard to believe that anybody can be more to the left than her.

She can retire now.

[Rockingham]

In sum, the decision below was so putrid that even RBG and the other libs gagged on it.

[Eleutheria5]

The whole SCOTUS is racist, including black and Hispanic justices. Anyone who is against undocumented migrants is racist./s

[Professional]

Ginnie.... live long, but not in good health

[SmokingJoe]

, the Ninth Circuit reversed the decision, not based on arguments presented by Sineneng-Smith, but by third parties the court brought in to submit arguments that the panel of judges themselves had suggested.

You just can't make this sh*t up.

[Mr. K]

Wow... even Ginsberg couldn’t stomach this?

[Lurkinanloomin]

It has to be really egregious for a unanimous decision by this court.

[reed13k]

If it was that bad shouldn’t the 9th circuit judges be considered for impeachment and removal?

[Laslo Fripp]

I see what you did there. 😀

[Blood of Tyrants]

They should. But the Dems won’t allow it because it requires 2/3 of the Senate to remove a federal judge.

[Dr. Sivana]

Does this show that Ginsburg is really a racist, deep in her heart?

No, it shows that she is an intelligent lefty, who knows where this could go, and quickly, if not stopped.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Was this a decision by the Ninth Circus V1.0, or the Ninth Circus V2.0?

[Blood of Tyrants]

I’m thinking it was before Trump started appointing judges to the 9th.

[Rinnwald]

So, USSC comes down with a unanimous anti-leftist decision, and media spins it as some sort of rah-rah “RBG is vibrant” story? Figures.

[Dr. Sivana]

i>So, USSC comes down with a unanimous anti-leftist decision, and media spins it as some sort of rah-rah “RBG is vibrant” story? Figures.

Well, if she MUST get to write decisions, it may as well be those slam-dunk 9-0 votes.

[dsc]

“intelligent lefty”

Oxymoron. A person isn’t intelligent unless they can ponder reality and arrive at correct conclusions. No one who can do that is a lefty.

[karnage]

Silly friar, Dems can’t be racist.