Posted on 02/24/2020 5:18:52 PM PST by BusterDog
I never heard of it but it comes with this warning:
Caution: Preprints are preliminary reports of work that have not been peer-reviewed. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Actually, the previous numbers were 1%-2%. This is 2 times worse than those numbers.
Advise.?
I have changed my prognosis on the world’s response to KungFlu to profoundly negative. Summed up by this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZuMe5RvxPQ
Italy can’t even find patient zero. Physical attacks on Asians there.
Passengers coming from China through Europe and lying about where they have been.
DHS won’t say it was/wasn’t man made.
CDC can’t even make viable test kits in a reasonable quantity.
The Chi-coms are clearly in total panic.
The economy will take a big hit on this that will be blamed on Trump.
I heard a comment that virtually everyone in China already has compromised lungs and leads to a higher death rate. Makes sense.
You missed:
Congress is getting a classified briefing tomorrow. They will hear from officials from a variety of agencies, including HHS, DHS, CDC, NIH and State...
“Consider this is mostly, almost all asian deaths.. They are more prone to have serious cases and die from this than those with european genetics.”
I keep seeing people post this, but where is the supporting study? Could it be simply a case of most of the infections to date have been in Asia - where mostly Asians live? I’ve seen one incomplete study that ranked susceptibility by race, but in no way said this was a predominantly Asian thing. Smoking was a bigger factor. Is there a better, more complete study that has the racial data and controls for environmental factors?
I suspect the high rates of smoking among Chinese men have a lot to do with the mortality rate of a primarily respiratory illness.
Don’t be Asian.
Or Italian.
Or Iranian.
Forgot that one, it is a bad omen. Which traitor will be the first to break the security of the briefing? Schiff and Nadless will be out blaming Trump before first break.
Was it the FR Virologist League that assured you? Aren't they all in the lab busy reverse engineering the virus molecule?
“ Nice crystal ball you have there.
When will this rising tide start happening?”
Since we’re talking crystal balls...My guess is a lower open followed by buying and a higher close. It will take a while to exceed previous highs, but most likely not too many months.
Thanks... good info.
.
I also think they aren’t necessarily factoring in the reinfection rates, which can be worse the second time around on the heart. These are the people keeling over from a heart attack.
yesthatjallen wrote:
“”What is Medrxiv.org?”
I never heard of it but it comes with this warning:
Caution: Preprints are preliminary reports of work that have not been peer-reviewed. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.”
Thank you for posting this info!!!
NOTE THESE:
-—preliminary report-—
-—should not be reported in news media as established information-—
-—PING-—
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3819214/posts?page=21#21
Caution: Preprints are preliminary reports of work that have not been peer-reviewed. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice or health-related behavior and should not be reported in news media as established information.
Read that right up front and left that site.
Italians might not agree with you right now.
“Although new details about the virus’s nature and its growth are still emerging, we know that it has a 2–14 day incubation period and the average #/transmissions by each person who has it is roughly 2.6. As of Feb 14, over 64,000 have been suspected/confirmed to be infected, with almost 1400 deaths.
Despite the seemingly endless media coverage of the virus, many questions remain unanswered. Are there truly only 60k+ confirmed cases, or is this figure deflated? Is the number of fatalities under-reported as well? How fast is the virus spreading every day? How dangerous is it? In order for us to accurately gauge the danger it poses, it’s necessary to calculate the mortality rate. Even if the virus is spreading quickly, it is not a large threat if people don’t die after contracting it.
Currently, the mortality rate calculations are incorrect and misleading. As of now, it is calculated by dividing the number of deaths by the number of infected. The figure below shows the “misleading” mortality rate for Hubei Province since Jan 22. Based on these calculations, the mortality rate is determined to be around 2.5% currently. However, it is incorrect because it does not take one hugely important factor into account: the lag effect.”
There seem to be some likely significant unknown unknowns lurking around out there.
“I keep seeing people post this, but where is the supporting study? Could it be simply a case of most of the infections to date have been in Asia - where mostly Asians live? I’ve seen one incomplete study that ranked susceptibility by race, but in no way said this was a predominantly Asian thing. Smoking was a bigger factor. Is there a better, more complete study that has the racial data and controls for environmental factors?”
Coronavirus risk for Asians, Africans, Caucasians revealed”:
https://www.eturbonews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/risk.jpeg
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
