Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Blond

Actually, the previous numbers were 1%-2%. This is 2 times worse than those numbers.

Advise.?


22 posted on 02/24/2020 5:30:38 PM PST by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Black Agnes

Don’t be Asian.


28 posted on 02/24/2020 5:37:51 PM PST by Mr. Blond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: Black Agnes
Actually, the previous numbers were 1%-2%. This is 2 times worse than those numbers.

Advise.?


Actually, the previous numbers were 24% (when I started following this news), and slowly down to 9.5% as China pushed out more fake numbers.

This study supposedly comes from 50M patients, yet, according to the official Johns Hopkins numbers, there's only been 27M recoveries, and 2700 deaths? (Fatality rate of 8.9%, not 4.8%.) So that means this study looked at an additional 20M patients who are currently infected and haven't died nor recovered, so how does it include them in the mortality rate? They can't predict the future, so they just lumped them all in as recovered? Even though around 2000 of them will likely die?
93 posted on 02/24/2020 10:26:54 PM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson